Page 107 - EJMO-9-3
P. 107

Eurasian Journal of
            Medicine and Oncology                                           Novel senescence-based melanoma risk model



            28.  Newman AM, Liu CL, Green MR, et al. Robust enumeration   Commun. 2020;11(1):1839.
               of cell subsets from tissue expression profiles. Nat Methods.      doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-15538-9
               2015;12(5):453-457.
                                                               35.  Bogunovic D, O’Neill DW, Belitskaya-Levy I, et al. Immune
               doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3337                            profile and mitotic index of metastatic melanoma lesions
            29.  Jacquelot N,  Duong  CPM,  Belz  GT, Zitvogel  L. Targeting   enhance clinical staging in predicting patient survival. Proc
               chemokine and chemokine receptors in melanoma and   Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106(48):20429-20434.
               other cancers. Front Immunol. 2018;9:2480.         doi: 10.1073/pnas.0905139106
               doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.02480                   36.  Homann L, Rentschler M, Brenner E, Bohm K, Rocken M,
            30.  Cesati M, Scatozza F, D’Arcangelo D,  et al. Investigating   Wieder T. IFN-γ gamma and TNF induce senescence and
               serum and  tissue expression  identified  a  cytokine/  a distinct senescence-associated secretory phenotype in
               chemokine signature as a highly effective melanoma marker.   melanoma. Cells. 2022;11(9):1514.
               Cancers (Basel). 2020;12(12):3680.                 doi: 10.3390/cells11091514
               doi: 10.3390/cancers12123680                    37.  Safi M, Jin C, Aldanakh A, et al. Immune checkpoint inhibitor
            31.  Ziogas DC, Theocharopoulos C, Koutouratsas T, Haanen J,   (ICI)  genes  and  aging  in  malignant  melanoma  patients:
               Gogas H. Mechanisms of resistance to immune checkpoint   A clinicogenomic TCGA study. BMC Cancer. 2022;22(1):978.
               inhibitors in melanoma: What we have to overcome? Cancer      doi: 10.1186/s12885-022-09860-2
               Treat Rev. 2023;113:102499.
                                                               38.  Fukuda K. Networks of CD8  T cell response activation in
                                                                                       +
               doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2022.102499                    melanoma and vitiligo. Front Immunol. 2022;13:866703.
            32.  Nirmal AJ, Maliga Z, Vallius T, et al. The spatial landscape      doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.866703
               of progression and immune editing in primary melanoma at
               single-cell resolution. Cancer Discov. 2022;12(6):1518-1541.  39.  Zeng N, Guo C, Wang Y, et al. Characterization of aging-
                                                                  related genes to predict prognosis and evaluate the tumor
               doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-21-1357                  immune  microenvironment in  malignant  melanoma.
            33.  Gaydosik AM, Tabib T, Geskin LJ, et al. Single-cell lymphocyte   J Oncol. 2022;2022:1271378.
               heterogeneity in advanced cutaneous t-cell lymphoma skin      doi: 10.1155/2022/1271378
               tumors. Clin Cancer Res. 2019;25(14):4443-4454.
                                                               40.  Liang X, Lin X, Lin Z, Lin W, Peng Z, Wei S. Genes associated
               doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-19-0148                 with cellular senescence favor melanoma prognosis by
                                                                  stimulating immune responses in tumor microenvironment.
            34.  Mitra  A,  Andrews  MC,  Roh  W,  et  al.  Spatially  resolved
               analyses link genomic and immune diversity and reveal   Comput Biol Med. 2023;158:106850.
               unfavorable  neutrophil  activation  in  melanoma.  Nat      doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2023.106850

































            Volume 9 Issue 3 (2025)                         99                              doi: 10.36922/ejmo.8574
   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112