Page 243 - EJMO-9-3
P. 243

Eurasian Journal of
            Medicine and Oncology                                                 ICU pharmacists and clinical outcomes



            the magnitude of benefit demonstrated. Policymakers   demographic groups. Ultimately, integrating CCPs represents
            and healthcare leaders should advocate for expanding   not only a pharmacological intervention but also a structural
            pharmacist roles in the ICU beyond the traditional scope.   advancement in ICU team-based care, contributing to safer,
            Furthermore, educational and professional development   more efficient, and outcome-driven patient management.
            programs must be tailored to produce pharmacists with the
            advanced competencies required for critical care practice.   Acknowledgments
            This integration may also be cost-effective. Although our   None.
            analysis did not focus on economic outcomes, prior studies
            have shown that pharmacist interventions lead to reduced   Funding
            length of stay, MRPs, and lower hospital readmissions, all   None.
            contributing to healthcare cost savings. 48,49

            5. Limitations                                     Conflict of interest
            Despite the compelling results, several limitations should   The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
            be acknowledged:                                   Author contributions
            (i)  Heterogeneity: There  was significant heterogeneity
               among the included studies in terms of design, sample   Conceptualization: Mohamed S. Imam, Fawaz Saad Yahya
               size, CCP roles, and outcome definitions. While    Thabit
               random-effects modeling mitigates this statistically,   Data curation: All authors
               clinical heterogeneity remains a consideration.  Writing – original draft: All authors
            (ii)  Study  design:  Only  a  few  of  the  included  studies   Writing – review & editing: All authors
               were randomized trials; most were observational,
               potentially introducing bias.                   Ethics approval and consent to participate
            (iii) Inadequate subgroup data: The inability to perform   Not applicable.
               subgroup analyses based on variables such as age,
               gender, severity scores, ICU type (e.g., medical vs.   Consent for publication
               surgical), and comorbidities limits the granularity of   Not applicable.
               the findings.
            (iv)  Lack of long-term outcomes: Most studies reported   Availability of data
               only in-hospital outcomes. The long-term impact of
               CCPs on quality of life, post-ICU syndrome, or 90-day   The data analyzed in this meta-analysis were extracted
               mortality remains to be clarified.              from publicly available publications, with full citations and
            (v)  Economic evaluation: While improved clinical   article links provided in the references section.
               outcomes often translate to cost savings, this analysis   References
               did not explore cost-effectiveness, which is an essential
               consideration for implementation.               1.   Pronovost  PJ,  Angus  DC,  Dorman  T,  Robinson  KA,
                                                                  Dremsizov TT, Young TL. Physician staffing  patterns and
            6. Conclusion                                         clinical outcomes in critically ill patients: A  systematic
                                                                  review. JAMA. 2002;288(17):2151-2162.
            This systematic review and meta-analysis provide
            compelling evidence that the incorporation of CCPs      doi: 10.1001/jama.288.17.2151
            into ICU teams is associated with significantly lower   2.   Arredondo E, Udeani G, Horseman M, Hintze TD, Surani S.
            mortality  and  fewer  ADEs  among  critically  ill  patients.   Role of clinical pharmacists in intensive care units. Cureus.
            The  findings  reinforce  the  importance  of  pharmacist-led   2021;13(9):e17929.
            pharmacotherapy optimization, antimicrobial stewardship,      doi: 10.7759/cureus.17929
            and  interdisciplinary  collaboration  in  intensive  care
            settings. Given the clinical relevance of these outcomes   3.   Lee H, Ryu K, Sohn Y, Kim J, Suh GY, Kim E. Impact
            and the increasing complexity of ICU pharmacotherapy,   on patient outcomes of pharmacist participation in
                                                                  multidisciplinary critical care teams: A  systematic review
            healthcare institutions and policymakers should consider the   and meta-analysis. Crit Care Med. 2019;47(9):1243-1250.
            routine deployment of CCPs as a strategic priority. Future
            studies should aim to address remaining gaps, including      doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003830
            the cost-effectiveness of CCP services, long-term patient   4.   Jacobi J, Kane‐Gill S, Boucher B. Critical care pharmacists
            outcomes, and their impact across various ICU subtypes and   have a rich history and evolving roles. J Am Coll Clin Pharm.


            Volume 9 Issue 3 (2025)                        235                         doi: 10.36922/EJMO025150116
   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248