Page 286 - EJMO-9-3
P. 286

Eurasian Journal of
            Medicine and Oncology                                  Preperitoneal infiltration after laparoscopic cholecystectomy




                                        required fewer opioids, had delayed onset of rescue analgesia, and reported lower
                                        pain scores at critical post-operative intervals.


                                        Keywords: Transversus abdominis plane block; Preperitoneal space; Cholecystectomy;
                                        Analgesia




            1. Introduction                                    analgesia. In addition, the potential risk of inadvertent
                                                               intraperitoneal injection or inconsistent drug spread may
            Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a commonly performed   limit its effectiveness. 6,7
            procedure, typically associated with a short post-operative
            hospital stay.  Although laparoscopic cholecystectomy   Both TAP block and preperitoneal infiltration are
                       1
            operations result in less post-operative pain than open   associated with minimal complications. TAP block has been
            cholecystectomy operations, severe and moderate pain   reported to have a favorable safety profile, with rare but
            are  the  most  common  concerns,  particularly  during  the   potential risks including inadvertent needle injury to adjacent
            first 24 h. A critical objective for early hospital discharge   structures such as the liver or bowel. In addition, improper
            is implementing appropriate pain management.  In   administration may result in incomplete analgesia or block
                                                      2
            general,  multimodal  analgesic  techniques,  such  as   failure. Preperitoneal infiltration, a simpler technique,
            intravenous  patient-controlled analgesia and thoracic   carries a lower risk of technical complications but may be less
            epidural analgesia, are implemented to mitigate pain.  A   effective in managing pain at later post-operative stages. 8
                                                        3
            regional nerve blockade method known as the transversus   This  study compares the analgesic  efficacy  of
            abdominis plane (TAP) block, which has recently acquired   preperitoneal  infiltration  with  bupivacaine  and
            popularity, is now a frequently used multimodal approach   dexamethasone and the TAP block in patients undergoing
            element in post-operative pain management. 4
                                                               laparoscopic cholecystectomy. This comparison is based
              The TAP block is a regional anesthesia technique that   primarily on post-operative pain scores (Visual Analog
            involves injecting local anesthetics into the TAP, located   Scale  [VAS])  and  the  time  for  first  request  for  rescue
            between the transversus abdominis and internal oblique   analgesia, which are critical metrics for evaluating pain
            muscles. This technique has gained popularity due to its   management strategies.
            effectiveness in reducing post-operative pain and opioid
            consumption, particularly when ultrasound guidance is   2. Methodology
            used to enhance precision. Studies have demonstrated   This randomized, prospective, double-blinded study was
            that TAP block significantly prolongs the duration of   performed at the Department of Anesthesia and General
            analgesia, delaying the first request for rescue analgesia and   Surgery  of  Al-Zahraa  University Hospital and  Minia
            improving overall patient comfort. However, its primary   University Hospital, Egypt. This study was approved by
            limitation is its inability to provide visceral pain relief,   the Institutional Review Board and the Ethical Committee
            as it primarily targets somatic pain from the abdominal   of the Faculty of Medicine for Girls, Al-Azhar University
            wall. In addition, its efficacy is highly operator-dependent,   (Approval Number 1784/2023), and additionally by the
            requiring technical expertise and ultrasound guidance for   Institutional Review Board of Minia University Hospital,
            optimal results. 5
                                                               according to the WMA Declaration of Helsinki. It was
              Preperitoneal infiltration involves the administration   approved by the Ethical Committee of Al-Azhar Faculty
            of local anesthetics into the preperitoneal space, effectively   of Medicine. The study was conducted for 6 months from
            targeting nociceptive pathways to reduce post-operative   February 2023 to August 2023. The trial was filed at the
            pain. This technique offers several advantages, including   Pan African Clinical Trial Registry (pactr.samrc.ac.za)
            ease  of  administration  under  direct  laparoscopic   database (PACTR202504865598437).
            visualization and reduced dependence on specialized
            equipment like ultrasound. Furthermore, preperitoneal   The participants were informed of the study’s objectives
            infiltration can minimize opioid requirements, thereby   and instruments. This investigation was conducted with
                                                               the approval of the institutional review board of the Faculty
            reducing the incidence of opioid-related side effects   of Medicine for Girls Al-Azhar University (1784/2023).
            such as post-operative nausea and vomiting (PONV)
            and sedation. However, its analgesic duration is shorter   The study was voluntary, and each participant had to
            than the TAP block, often necessitating earlier rescue   provide informed written consent before enrollment. Each


            Volume 9 Issue 3 (2025)                        278                         doi: 10.36922/EJMO025180164
   281   282   283   284   285   286   287   288   289   290   291