Page 91 - ESAM-1-4
P. 91
Engineering Science in
Additive Manufacturing TwinPrint: Dual-arm robotic bioprinting
36. Montalti A, Ferretti P, Santi GM. From CAD to G-code: Lett. 2017;14(6):6999-7010.
Strategies to minimizing errors in 3D printing process. CIRP
J Manuf Sci Technol. 2024;55:62-70. doi: 10.3892/ol.2017.7134
40. Heinrich MA, Bansal R, Lammers T, Zhang YS, Michel
doi: 10.1016/j.cirpj.2024.09.005
Schiffelers R, Prakash J. 3D‐bioprinted mini-brain:
37. Bikas H, Stavropoulos P, Chryssolouris G. Additive A glioblastoma model to study cellular interactions and
manufacturing methods and modelling approaches: A critical therapeutics. Adv Mater. 2019;31(14):e1806590.
review. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2016;83(1-4):389-405.
doi: 10.1002/adma.201806590
doi: 10.1007/s00170-015-7576-2
41. Kokkaliaris KD, Scadden DT. Cell interactions in the bone
38. Hammad NS, Khan ZN, Valle-Pérez AU, Hauser C. marrow microenvironment affecting myeloid malignancies.
A predictive machine learning model to optimize flow rates Blood Adv. 2020;4(15):3795-3803.
on an integrated microfluidic pumping system for peptide-
based 3D bioprinting. In: Gray BL, Rapp BE, editors. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2020002127
Microfluidics, BioMEMS, and Medical Microsystems XXI. 42. Ladikou EE, Sivaloganathan H, Pepper A, Chevassut T.
Washington, DC: SPIE; 2023. p. 3. Acute myeloid leukaemia in its niche: The bone marrow
doi: 10.1117/12.2650440 microenvironment in acute myeloid leukaemia. Curr Oncol
Rep. 2020;22(3):27.
39. Lv D, Hu Z, Lu L, Lu H, Xu X. Three-dimensional cell culture:
A powerful tool in tumor research and drug discovery. Oncol doi: 10.1007/s11912-020-0885-0
Volume 1 Issue 4 (2025) 14 doi: 10.36922/ESAM025410025

