Page 207 - GHES-3-2
P. 207

Global Health Economics and
            Sustainability
                                                                                      Gender inequality and healthcare


            Through visualization and descriptive analysis, our study   research and investigate other trends, such as linearity and/
            offers insight into the various indicators and areas where   or causality.
            stakeholders should focus their resources to reduce gender
            disparities and their impact on healthcare. The overall   Acknowledgments
            objective is to improve public health for all, particularly in   None.
            areas such as immunization, fertility rate, HIV, and other
            diseases, access to anti-retroviral drugs, mortality rate, and   Funding
            life expectancy, among more. Both gender inequality and
            health are central to individual and societal well-being   None.
            and quality of life. The framing and analysis of these issues   Conflict of interest
            should consider the macro-level factors (e.g., culture,
            ethnicity, race, religious beliefs, and social dynamics)   The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
            and the hierarchy within which the gender-health
            connection is shaped. This holistic approach requires the   Author contributions
            integration  of  diverse disciplines, innovative models,   Conceptualization: Wullianallur Raghupathi
            and comprehensive data sources. As health disparities   Formal analysis: Viju Raghupathi
            continue to widen globally and gender inequalities   Investigation: All authors
            persist, it is crucial to explore alternative perspectives   Methodology: Wullianallur Raghupathi, Sarah Jinhui Wu
            in research and strategy regarding gender equity and   Writing–original draft: Wullianallur Raghupathi
            healthcare delivery, as well as the prevailing inequities.   Writing – review & editing: Sarah Jinhui Wu, Viju
            When shaping action research and developing strategies,   Raghupathi
            stakeholders, including governments, must recognize the
            paradox of gender equality – both as a catalyst for equal   Ethics approval and consent to participate
            opportunity and, in some cases, a trigger for inequality.
            Addressing these macro-level disparities requires targeted   Not applicable.
            interventions at the highest levels of government and   Consent for publication
            society.  Researchers  play  a  critical  role  in  empirically
            examining the phenomenon and publishing their findings.   Not applicable.
            Similarly, policymakers can develop innovative policies
            and collaborate with governments and other stakeholders   Availability of data
            for effective implementation. The government plays   Data are available from the corresponding author on
            an active role in advocating for actionable policies and   reasonable request.
            implementing them. All stakeholders must effectively
            communicate the benefits and risks to the public at   References
            large. Gender equality and equitable access to healthcare   Anderson, M., Pitchforth, E., Asaria, M., Brayne, C., Casadei, B.,
            are  fundamental human rights, and education is key to   Charlesworth, A.,  et al. (2021). LSE-Lancet Commission
            advancing these goals.                                on the future of the NHS: Re-laying the foundations for
              The present study paves the way for future research   an equitable and efficient health and care service after
            endeavors. Future studies should explore the impact   COVID-19. The Lancet, 397(10288):1915-1978.
            of climate change on gender inequality and healthcare,      https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00232-4
            particularly whether climate change disproportionately   Annandale, E., & Hunt, K. (2000). Gender Inequalities in Health:
            affects women. Additional research through focus groups,   Research at the Crossroads. Buckingham: Open University
            case studies, field studies, and the analysis of other data   Press.
            categories (e.g., economic data and poverty) may provide
            deeper insights into the relationship. Beyond macro-level   Arber, S., & Khlat, M. (2002). Social and economic patterning
            factors, future research could examine country governance   of women’s health in a changing world. Social Science and
                                                                  Medicine, 54: 643-647.
            systems, healthcare delivery models (e.g., national systems,
            insurance-based, hybrid systems, and single vs. multi-payer      https://doi.org/10.1016/s0277-9536(01)00114-9
            systems), and the role of digital technologies in enabling   Artazcoz, L., Benach, J., Borrell, C., & Cortes, I. (2007). Health
            healthcare  (e.g.,  e-health,  m-health,  and  telemedicine).   inequalities in a combined framework of work, gender and
            In addition, future research can build on the preliminary   social class. In: Work and Social Inequalities in Health in
            associations between variables highlighted in the current   Europe. Switzerland: Peter Lang, p.479.


            Volume 3 Issue 2 (2025)                        199                       https://doi.org/10.36922/ghes.5776
   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212