Page 265 - GHES-3-3
P. 265

Global Health Economics and
            Sustainability
                                                                  Sustainability of Rwanda’s UHC: 2011–2021 and vision 2050


            to shift the supply side from non-profit to mixed-profit   which is applicable to both wealthier Rwandans and the
            status, fostering industry self-reliance through enhanced   Rwandans in the diaspora.
            internal revenue. It also modernizes the cost-recovery   Category B members can visit any public or agreed-
            model (Bamako Initiative), originally reinstated by the   upon health-care facility nationwide without the
            government of national unity from a resilience perspective.  compulsory referral process, except for King Faisal

              Equity in financial access is demonstrated by the DRG   Hospital (KFH). For KFH, a transfer note from the medical
            unit price for CBHI category A, with a base rate of 3.2% of   committee at each university teaching tertiary hospital is
            costs recovered (USD 2.56 out of USD 81.17), following   required. The referral process has shifted from the RSSB
            the removal of co-payments at P/A service points. The   medical commission to a new committee at university
            USD 2.56 represents the individual annual premium,   teaching tertiary hospitals. This committee, consisting of
            whereas the USD 81.17 reflects Rwanda’s per capita health   three specialist doctors, aims to speed up decision-making
            expenditure.                                       in emergencies, avoiding delays by administrative staff
                                                               without clinical expertise. Rwandans in the diaspora who
            3.3.2. Basic tariff rates                          wish to join CBHI Category A will pay USD 15 annually,
            For  CBHI  category  A,  the  minimum  tariff  rate  is  3.2%,   which is more than approximately 5 times the premium
            and the basic rate has been reduced to 3%, as shown in   for ordinary Category A members. This fee grants access
            Table 2. This results in an annual individual premium of   to the CBHI system with the compulsory referral process
            USD 2.56, down from USD 81.17 (previously USD 57.5   from the district hospital level and treatment at no extra
            in 2020 with a 9% AGR) for Rwanda’s per capita health   charge while vacationing in Rwanda. However, uninsured
            expenditure in 2024/2025. The rates in  Table 2 also   diaspora members will be treated as uninsured Rwandans
            reflect the updated co-payment structure and benefits   and will pay the same subsidized rate (91%) as that paid by
            from CBHI modernization, including food and dietetic   uninsured Rwandan citizens (9/3) (Table 2).
            services for both Rwandan and foreign patients. Luxury
            accommodation is excluded from these rates.        3.3.4. Medical tourism in the public/agree (faith-
                                                               based) health care delivery system
              The authors demonstrate that ordinary members of
            Rwanda’s CBHI contribute only 3% (USD 2.56 of the   The concept of medical tourism has been introduced in
            projected USD 81.17 per capita health expenditure for   Rwanda’s public health sector to promote and export the
            2024/25), with the remaining 97% covered by government   country’s “equitable and dignified health-care provision,”
                                                               offering comprehensive quality care from self-reliance and
            subsidies. Other Rwandan population groups contribute   self-esteem (kwihesha agaciro) perspective. This concept,
            between 6% (with 94% subsidized) and 9% (with 91%   part of a 2014 study by the Rwanda Development Board,
            subsidized). Although foreigners pay higher fees, their   primarily targeted the private sector, and its implementation
            contributions remain substantially subsidized – on average,   is highly anticipated in P/A health-care sectors. Researchers
            between 70% and 85% for individuals from neighboring   have also proposed the following recommendations and
            countries, 75% for most African nationals, and 65% for   advice, which extend beyond the scope of medical tourism
            individuals from other regions.
                                                               and are applicable to the broader health-care system:
              Rwanda’s pricing system, as shown in  Table  2, is   (i)   Rare or expensive medical procedures will be billed
            designed to promote self-reliance (kwigira/ubwihaze) and   separately from the DRG unit price
            sovereignty (ubusugire) while ensuring dignified, equitable   (ii)   CBHI beneficiaries who opt for Income-Generating
            health care for both Rwandan citizens and the global    Activity-Health  Service  Related  (IGA-HSR)
            community. This acknowledges the significant contribution   treatment shall be responsible for covering the cost
            of  the international  community to  Rwanda’s healthc-are   difference between DRG Category B and Category
            resilience  since  the  1994  genocide.  With  the  health-care   A. The CBHI scheme will reimburse up to the
            system now restored, Rwanda aims to provide affordable,   standard cost of Category A only
            high-quality health care to the global community.  (iii)  Rwandan citizens abroad who are not enrolled in
                                                                    CBHI will be required to pay 3  times the CBHI
            3.3.3. Comfortable benefit package of the CBHI system
                                                                    Category A (ordinary) beneficiary rate, similar to
            The study introduced a CBHI beneficiary Category B, with   the cost for uninsured residents
            a premium set at twice the DRGs unit price of Category A.   (iv)   Internal professional dualism is permitted; however,
            The annual individual premium for Category B is USD 35,   the regular workload remains the priority
            which is more than approximately five times higher than   (v)   Standard honorary fees will be set by the MoH and
            the premium for ordinary, wealthier Category A members,   professional councils


            Volume 3 Issue 3 (2025)                        257                       https://doi.org/10.36922/ghes.5842
   260   261   262   263   264   265   266   267   268   269   270