Page 263 - GHES-3-3
P. 263

Global Health Economics and
            Sustainability
                                                                  Sustainability of Rwanda’s UHC: 2011–2021 and vision 2050


            3.2. Identification of the challenges and its solutions   22.63  billion  granted  in  FY  2020/2021,  (iv)  preserving
            during the implementation of CBHI system (Specific   existing financial resources instead of requesting additional
            Objective 2)                                       funds, (v) reforming the purchasing and claims payment
                                                               policy from FFS PPM to FASP PPM, (vi) implementing
            The assessment of the 2011/2012  – 2020/2021 income
            statements revealed gaps and deficiencies in the   a Diagnosis-Related Groups (DRG)-based billing system,
            implementation of the 2010 CBHI policy and the FFS PPM.  (vii) integrating clinical and community performance-
                                                               based financing into routine CHFP management, (viii)
            3.2.1. Institutional capacity-building gaps of the CBHI   utilizing Health Management Information System (HMIS)-
            system (2010 CBHI policy Objective 1)              reported data for billing, (ix) improving access to HMIS
                                                               for CBHI staffs, (x) fostering a culture of cost control, and
            Deficits in management, financial, and actuarial risk   (xi) automating the billing system to facilitate financial
            analysis skills hindered the achievement of this goal.
                                                               management and strengthen financial sustainability.
              The recommended solutions for objective 1
            include  (i)  providing  institutional  support  through   3.2.3. Equitable quality health-care access for all
            technical assistance and capacity-building services and   (2010 CBHI policy Objective 3)
            (ii)  integrating relevant budget lines into the CBHI   Regarding equitable health-care access, the goal of
            expenditure component.                             providing equal domestic health-care access for all CBHI
                                                               beneficiaries (approximately 94% of the population)
            3.2.2. Financial sustainability gaps of the CBHI system   has largely been met. However, challenges remain with
            (2010 CBHI policy Objective 2)
                                                               specialized care access.
            The 2010 CBHI policy highlights incomplete legal revenue   Suggested  solutions  to  promote  equitable  quality
            mobilization and recovery. A shortfall of RWF 62.13 billion   health care and universal access include: (i) improving
            was identified, including RWF 25.43 billion from 1% of   the  AGR  of community  health  workers  from a  negative
            domestic resources (FY 2022/2023) and RWF 36.70 billion   growth rate of −5% to 206%, (ii) reducing fraud at health
            from 13% of the Ministry of Health (MOH) budget. In   posts and providing performance-based incentives for
            addition, over-billing of health services led to an overpayment   community health workers,  (iii)  opening  new health
            of RWF 39.25 billion, exacerbated by inefficiencies in the   centers that meet new-generation facility standards and
            FFS PPM, causing cost escalation. This resulted in a total   strengthening existing ones, (iv) formalizing specialist
            gap of RWF 101.38 billion, which represented 131.95% of   outreach nationwide – especially in district hospitals,
            the CBHI total expenditure in 2020/2021. If the two basic   (v) expanding  provincial hospitals from four to eight,
            policies are effectively implemented, CBHI could achieve   increasing their clinical capacity by raising AGR from 10%
            self-sufficiency, enhance operational efficiency, and offer   to 40%, and (vi) increasing contracted private specialty
            specialized care to all, as outlined in HRV 2050.  health establishments to improve access. The AGR of the
              The study also identified other deficiencies  on the   related budget line increases from 10% to 20%.
            CBHI demand side, including: (i) replacing the 13% MOH
            budget with indigent enrolment subsidies, (ii) CBHI’s   3.2.4. Protection against financial hardship (2010
            2020 – 2023 strategic budget, which included excessive   CBHI Policy Objective 4)
            common expenses of RWF 5,595,598,987 (omitted from   While the goal of protecting against financial hardship has
            the FY 2020/2021 revised budget), (iii) RWF 500 million   largely been met, issues remain with specialized care access
            incorrectly budgeted for returns on investment alongside   and the 10% co-payment. According to Nyandekwe et al.
            investment expenses, (iv) the “interest on current accounts”   (2014), only 2.17% of the 94% CBHI target population can
            budget line was removed in FY 2020/2021, (v) excessive   afford the co-payment for specialized treatments, such as
            time was spent on claims verification and reconciliation,   kidney transplants, costing RWF 2.0 – 2.5 million. Without
            (vi) an AGR of 48 – 50% in staff costs was observed, and   abolishing the co-payment, 91.83% of the CBHI members
            (vii) the lack of a cost-control culture led to ongoing   will be excluded.
            financial distress.                                  Suggested solutions to protect against financial hardship
              Suggested solutions to address CBHI’s implementation   include: abolishing co-payments at all public health-care
            gaps in financial sustainability include: (i) granting   facilities and implementing free health care at the point
            administrative and financial autonomy to CBHIs, (ii)   of service, with CBHI reimbursing the co-payment to
            establishing technical assistance and capacity-building   P/A health-care providers through a third-party payment
            services, (iii) effectively managing the additional RWF   mechanism. Failure to abolish the co-payment may result


            Volume 3 Issue 3 (2025)                        255                       https://doi.org/10.36922/ghes.5842
   258   259   260   261   262   263   264   265   266   267   268