Page 86 - GPD-3-4
P. 86

Gene & Protein in Disease                                  A prediction on how Epimedii herba treat periodontitis



            Cytoscape3.7.0. Nodes represented the ingredients and   module was used to connect the key active ingredients of EH
            targets in the network, and the interactions between them   to the processed protein to perform molecular docking. The
            were represented by edges. Then, the key ingredients were   higher the negative CDocker interaction energy (−CIE) value
            selected in the network based on the “degree” value.  of the docking, the more stable the docking system between
                                                               the chemical ingredients and protein receptors.
            2.5. Construction of a protein–protein interaction
            (PPI) network                                      2.8. Molecular dynamics
            The intersection targets of EH and periodontitis were   Gromacs-2022.04GPU was used to perform molecular
            input  into  the  STRING  platform  (https://string-db.org),   dynamics simulations between the active ingredient
            after which the tab control of “Multiple Proteins” was   and target protein with the best bonding ability in the
            selected, and “Homo Sapiens” was chosen as the organism   molecular docking results. The ATB website (http://atb.
            to construct the PPI network. Next, the obtained network   uq.edu.au/) was used to convert the active ingredient files
            was imported into Cytoscape 3.7.0 for further analysis.   into the molecular structure and topology files; the built-in
            The top 10 core targets were calculated using “CytoHubba”   commands in Gromacs-2022.04GPU were used to convert
            with the highest maximal clique centrality score.  the protein files into the molecular structure files. Then,
                                                               using the TIP3P model as water molecules, chloride, and
            2.6. Gene functional pathway enrichment analysis   sodium ions were added to the system to leave the system

            When the intersection targets were imported into the   at a normal saline concentration. The topology files of the
            Metascape database (http://metascape.org/), the species   chemical components were prepared using the PDB-2gmx
            was selected as “H. Sapiens” for GO and KEGG enrichment   module, and the receptor proteins were subjected to the
            analyses. GO is an internationally standardized system for   latest charmm36-jul2022 force field. After optimizing the
            the classification of gene functions, which can be divided   energy of the system, the temperature should be maintained
            into cellular components (CC), molecular functions (MF),   at 36.85°C, and the pressure should be maintained at 1 atm
            and biological  processes (BP).  KEGG  analysis provides   within a simulation period of 50 ns.
            more insights into the biological functions of genes. We   3. Results
            next selected the top 20 items of BP, MF, and CC and the
            top 20 results of KEGG enrichment analysis to construct   3.1. Collection of the active compounds and targets
            a histogram and bubble diagram using the Weishengxin   of EH
            website (http://www.bioinformatics.com.cn/).       Based on TCMSP, 23 effective active ingredients of EH
                                                               were obtained, as shown in Table 1. A total of 199 targets
            2.7. Molecular docking
                                                               related to the active ingredients of EH were obtained.
            The  3D  structure  files  of  the  key  active  ingredients  and
            targets were input into Discovery Studio 2019 for molecular   3.2. Acquisition of periodontitis-related targets
            docking. The PDB IDs of related proteins were 4EJN(AKT1),   Two periodontitis-related datasets were obtained from the
            7KP9(TNF), 1ALU(IL6), 6BFT(VEGFA), 1RHM(CASP3),    GEO database, namely, GSE10334 and GSE16134, which
            2OW1(MMP9), and 3OS8(ESR1). Protein preparation    contained 183 and 241 samples, respectively. Both datasets
            was performed, wherein the “Clean Protein” and “Prepare   covered the gingival tissues of patients with periodontitis
            Protein” modules were used to delete redundant protein   and healthy people.  Figure  1 shows the volcano map
            conformation and water molecules, and target proteins were   and heatmap of differential genes in periodontitis. After
            hydrogenated simultaneously. Then, the protein’s ligand   deleting duplicate gene targets, 3291 periodontitis-related
            position was selected as the active binding site. After deleting   targets were obtained from GeneCards, DrugBank, TTD,
            the original ligand and exposing the active binding pocket,   CTD, and GEO databases.
            the active site was defined as a receptor in the docking
            system. Next, hydrogenation and energy optimization were   3.3. Screening of the intersection targets of EH and
            also performed on the key effective ingredient. Then, the   periodontitis
            CDocker module was used to connect the original ligand to   By constructing a Venn diagram, 137 intersection targets
            the active pocket and calculate the root mean square deviation   were obtained, as depicted in Figure 2.
            (RMSD) of the molecular conformations. RMSD values of
            <2.0 Å indicate that the molecular conformation obtained by   3.4. Construction of the EH ingredient–target
            docking can reduce the ligand and receptor binding affinity,   interaction network
            thereby confirming the rationality of the selected docking   The EH ingredient–target interaction network (Figure 3)
            methods and parameter settings. Finally, the CDocker   consisted of 219 nodes and 439 edges. Each pathway


            Volume 3 Issue 4 (2024)                         3                               doi: 10.36922/gpd.4427
   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91