Page 74 - GTM-2-1
P. 74

Global Translational Medicine                                                          Mass balance




                           A                                       B


















            Figure 3. Dietary management of type 1 diabetes: MBM versus EBT simulation. (A) MBM predicts that the reduction in body mass caused by beta-cell
            death (i.e., onset of diabetes) is highly dependent on the macronutrient distribution of diet, a result that is consistent with the results of dietary treatments
            in the pre-insulin era . From the source , we can see how the model parameters have been modified in these diabetes simulations (i.e., xC = 0). (B) The
                         [51]
                                      [3]
            EBT-based model by Hall et al.  predicts that macronutrient distribution has a significantly lesser effect on body mass reduction.
                                [22]
            C: Carbohydrate; BW: Body weight; EBT: Energy balance theory; F: Fat; MBM: Mass balance model; P: Protein.
            (carbohydrate 44.0 ± 7.6%, protein 15.4 ± 3.3%, and fat   it  is worth mentioning  that the universal  assumption  of
            39.6 ± 5.8%) to a very-low-carbohydrate/high-fat diet   metabolism being synonymous with energy expenditure
            (carbohydrate 9.2 ± 4.8%, protein 21.9 ± 3.4%, and fat   is misleading, as metabolism is actually mass expenditure.
            69.0 ± 5.4%) can significantly reduce leptin levels. This is   Ludwig et al. have also claimed that their meta-analysis
                                                                                                           [34]
            consistent with the mass balance approach. The lower the   supports this assumption, but the conclusions do not stand
            body fat level, the lower the leptin level.        up to critical scrutiny .
                                                                                [35]
            16.2. Insulin (with special reference to the         Although, at a cursory glance, it might appear that
            carbohydrate-insulin model)                        the CIM is in agreement with the insulin response data,
                                                               in reality, it is a free passenger traveling on the wing of
            Insulin, a peptide hormone that is produced by pancreatic   mass change. The decrease in insulin level and the intake
            beta cells, is considered the main anabolic hormone of   of nutrient mass occurs simultaneously, but only mass
            the body. This is probably the reason why this hormone   can be a causal factor in mass change. In the MBM, it is
            has become a favorite of diet writers. The carbohydrate-  assumed that the changes in body mass and composition
            insulin model (CIM), an obesity-related model, proposes a   are  independent  of  the  physiological  effects  of a  diet.
            reversal of causal direction . According to proponents of   Rather, the differences are due to different amounts of
                                 [14]
            the CIM, “increasing fat deposition in the body – resulting   nutrient mass intake. MBM-based simulations provide
            from the hormonal responses to a high-glycemic-load   very convincing evidence for this assumption [1,3,7,8] .
            diet – drives positive energy balance” .
                                         [14]
                                                                 As  already  discussed,  however,  insulin  levels  are
              It is worth emphasizing that the CIM operates within   considered important in terms of where body fat
            the EBT; that is, it assumes that a positive energy balance   is reduced. In addition, there are other reasons for
            is the cause of obesity. It is, therefore, not a competing   maintaining low insulin levels. For instance, individuals
            paradigm. The direction of causality in this matter does not   with hyperinsulinemia are at higher risk of developing
            affect the laws of physics in any way. The physical basis of   obesity, type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease, cancer, and
            both the EBT and the CIM operating within it is flawed, as   premature mortality . It may seem paradoxical at first
                                                                               [36]
            has already been demonstrated.                     glance that the statement “insulin cannot create mass” is
              One of the central claims of the CIM is that high insulin   made, and then an article  that lists hyperinsulinemia as a
                                                                                   [36]
            levels  promote  weight  gain,  but  as  already  mentioned,   risk factor for obesity is referred to. To clarify the seemingly
            insulin cannot create mass from nothing. Although insulin   contradictory matter, it is important to understand
            levels decrease with low-carbohydrate diets, it is not a   that hyperinsulinemia is often caused by the regular
            causal factor in body mass and fat mass loss. It just happens   consumption of sugar and other refined carbohydrates,
            simultaneously with decreased nutrient mass intake.   while the individual also gains weight. In this situation,
            Proponents  of  the  CIM  suggest  that  high  insulin  levels   insulin does not cause obesity; rather, obesity is caused
            slow down metabolism, thus promoting weight gain ;   by a chronic positive mass balance. Here, it is referring to
                                                        [14]

            Volume 2 Issue 1 (2023)                         10                        https://doi.org/10.36922/gtm.222
   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79