Page 38 - IJAMD-2-2
P. 38

International Journal of AI for
            Materials and Design                                           ML-driven optimization in additive manufacturing


            reliance on traditional empirical trial-and-error methods.    of ML models, numerous studies have attempted to
                                                         54
            These ML-driven strategies significantly enhance process   monitor and control defects that emerge during FDM
            control, reduce production time and material waste, and   printing. In parallel, experimental approaches based on
            improve overall manufacturing reliability.         physical sensing techniques have been used to measure
                                                               process-induced deformation. For example, Kantaros
            3. ML-based 3D printing optimizations              and Karalekas utilized fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensors
            3.1. Polymers                                      to measure residual strains in ABS parts fabricated
                                                               via FDM, offering a physics-based understanding of
            Polymers are macromolecules composed of covalently   internal stresses through thermo-optic and strain-optic
            bonded repeating units, forming long chains that exhibit   coefficients. 78
            diverse rheological properties. Such chain structures endow
            polymers with low density, flexibility, and–in certain cases–  A common approach involves  in situ monitoring of
            viscoelastic behavior.  Their physicochemical properties   image data. 51,77-82  For instance, capturing the top view of an
                             34
            can also be tuned during synthesis and processing to   FDM part printed with ABS or PLA at certain build stages
            meet specific requirements. Owing to these adaptable   and then applying image-processing techniques combined
            characteristics, polymers are widely employed as elastomer   with  SVM  to  detect  the  presence  or  absence  of  defects
            matrices in soft robotics, 55-57  soft actuators, 58,59  and soft   has been reported.  Similarly, CNN have been employed
                                                                              79
            sensors. 8,60,61                                   to classify defects from top-view images of partially
                                                                             80
              Because of their tunability and ease of processing,   completed prints.  Moreover, FDM processes are highly
            polymers are well-suited for various 3D printing   sensitive to environmental conditions, which may drift
                                                                                                        81
            techniques.  Material  extrusion techniques like FDM   over time (so-called “drift” in process parameters).  Such
                     62
            typically use thermoplastic filaments such as ABS and   domain shifts can degrade the performance of previously
            PLA,  while DIW prints polymer-based materials,    trained diagnostic models. To mitigate this, a deep
                63
            including  hydrogels and elastomers.   Recent studies   learning-based defect detection system has been developed
                                           37
                                                                                                            54
            have leveraged ML-based approaches to optimize DIW   that utilizes  top-view images of PLA-printed samples.
            parameters, especially for bioinks and hydrogels used in   The training data were balanced using a conditional
            biomedical applications.  Key rheological behaviors–such   GAN (CGAN), and domain adversarial neural networks
                               37
            as apparent viscosity, shear-yielding, and shear-thinning–  (DANN) were employed to adapt to parameter drift. This
            are  typically  considered  for  DIW  formulations. 8,34,64,65   A   system achieved a classification accuracy of 91.01% in
            summary of recent ML applications and model types used   detecting various FDM defects. Nevertheless, relying solely
            for polymer-based 3D printing is presented in Table 1.  on top-view images can pose challenges in detecting flaws
                                                               on vertical surfaces. Complementing purely data-driven
              In addition, vat photopolymerization techniques such   approaches, hybrid models that incorporate physics-based
            as SLA and DLP enable high-resolution printing for   knowledge into ML frameworks have also been proposed.
            biomedical 66,67  and electronics 68,69  applications. During the   Kapusuzoglu and Mahadevan  demonstrated a physics-
                                                                                       46
            printing process, photosensitive resins must maintain a   informed ML model for fused filament fabrication, which
            low  viscosity  to  accommodate  continuous  layer-by-layer   integrates thermal and mechanical principles to improve
            fabrication and be formulated to exhibit optimal reactivity   prediction accuracy and reduce the data dependency often
            within the targeted wavelength range of the photoinitiation   seen in conventional ML models.
            system. While acrylate-  and epoxy-based monomers
            are commonly employed, 68-71  other  photosensitive   Beyond   defect  detection,  real-time  process
            formulations may be used for specialized applications. For   compensation offers a more proactive strategy. One study
            example, photocurable hydrogels are frequently considered   used a CNN-based classifier to analyze nozzle-near images
            for bioprinting. 67,71,72                          in real-time, detecting under-extrusion or over-extrusion
                                                               and automatically adjusting extrusion flow rates.  By
                                                                                                         82
            3.1.1. Process optimization                        incorporating a feedback loop, the system reduced
            Despite the advantages of polymer-based 3D printing,   corrective action times to 8.6 s for under-extrusion and
            process parameters can significantly influence printing   9.8 s for over-extrusion–faster than human intervention.
            quality and yield. In FDM, parameters such as nozzle   Another  work further  automated  process  correction by
                                                                                                51
            temperature, layer height, printing speed, build   modifying G-code based on defect types.  Using a YOLO
            orientation, and infill settings often affect part integrity,   object detection model, under- and over-extrusions were
            potentially  causing  interlayer  delamination  and  uneven   identified in real-time, and flow rates or recent G-code
            stress distributions. 73-77  With the rapid development   commands were updated accordingly. A  streamlined


            Volume 2 Issue 2 (2025)                         32                        doi: 10.36922/IJAMD025130010
   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43