Page 513 - IJB-10-1
P. 513

International Journal of Bioprinting                          Macro and micro structure of a 3D-printed implant




            5. Conclusion                                      Availability of data
            This study demonstrated that medical implants can be   Not applicable.
            designed by integrating macrotopology optimization and
            microlattice design to provide adequate mechanical strength   References
            and an environment for bone ingrowth after surgery. By
            employing this approach, the OWS for HTO can be designed   1.   Sutradhar A, Park J, Carrau D, Miller MJ. Experimental
            to incorporate fixation screws while featuring a crescent-  validation of 3D printed patient-specific implants using
            shaped cross-section. Additionally, a lattice structure can be   digital image correlation and finite element analysis. Comput
            introduced to the OWS posterior region to facilitate a more      Biol Med. 2014;52:8-17.
                                                                  doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2014.06.002
            favorable environment for bone ingrowth after surgery. Both
            FE analysis and biomechanical fatigue tests confirmed that   2.   Guoqing Z, Junxin L, Chengguang Z, Juanjuan X, Xiaoyu Z,
            mechanical performance, including displacement difference   Anmin W. Design optimization and manufacturing of bio-
            between the tibia medial and lateral sides, maximum   fixed tibial implants using 3D printing technology. J Mech
            implant stress, and maximum OWS bone stress with lattice      Behav Biomed Mater. 2021;117:104415.
                                                                  doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2021.104415
            design, was more stable than the TP fixations in the HTO.
            This result indicated that further in vivo animal or clinical   3.   Guoqing Z, Junxin L, Xiaoyu Z, Yongsheng Z, Yuchao B. The
            trials can be planned and conducted to validate the practical   design and processing of a 3D-printed high-performance
            feasibility of metal 3D-printed OWS in HTO, so as to hasten   biological fixation plate. Int J Bioprint. 2023;9:658.
            the translation into clinical application.            doi: 10.18063/ijb.v9i2.658
                                                               4.   Noroozi R, Tatar F, Zolfagharian A, et al. Additively
            Acknowledgments                                       manufactured  multi-morphology  bone-like  porous
                                                                  scaffolds: Experiments and micro-computed tomography-
            None.                                                 based finite element modeling approaches.  Int J Biopring.
                                                                  2022;8(3):556.
            Funding                                               doi: 10.18063/ijb.v8i3.556

            This study was supported in part by NSTC project   5.   Wang Z, Zhang M, Liu Z, et al. Biomimetic design strategy
            112-2221-E-A49-009-MY3 and 111-2327-B-A49-006,        of complex porous structure based on 3D printing Ti-6Al-
            Taiwan.                                               4V scaffolds for enhanced osseointegration.  Mater Des.
                                                                  2022;218:110721.
            Conflict of interest                                  doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2022.110721
                                                               6.   Wang YT, Chang CM, Liu PH, Lin CL. Feasibility evaluation
            The authors declare no conflicts of interest.         of a new lattice for porous surface design in additive
                                                                  manufacturing medical implants under interfacial tensile
            Author contributions                                  bonded testing. Addit Manuf. 2023;66:103455.
            Conceptualization: Chih-Hwa Chen, Chun-Li Lin         doi: 10.1016/j.addma.2023.103455
            Formal analysis:  Hsuan-Wen Wang, Kuan-Hao Chen,    7.   Frosch  S,  Nüsse  V,  Frosch  KH,  Lehmann  W,  Buchhorn
               Yu-Hui Zeng                                        G. Osseointegration of 3D porous and solid Ti-6Al-4V
            Investigation:  Hsuan-Wen Wang, Kuan-Hao Chen,        implants-narrow gap push-out testing and experimental
               Yu-Hui Zeng                                        setup  considerations.  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater.
            Methodology: Hsuan-Wen Wang, Yu-Hui Zeng              2021;115:104282.
            Writing – original draft:  Hsuan-Wen Wang, Chih-Hwa      doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2020.104282
               Chen, Chun-Li Lin                               8.   Chang B, Song W, Han T, et al. Influence of pore size of
            Writing – review & editing: Chih-Hwa Chen, Chun-Li Lin  porous  titanium  fabricated  by  vacuum  diffusion bonding
                                                                  of titanium meshes on cell penetration and bone ingrowth.
            Ethics approval and consent to participate            Acta Biomater. 2016;33:311-321.
                                                                  doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2016.01.022
            The medical image processing was conducted in accordance   9.   Liu X, Chen Z, Gao Y, zhang J, Jin Z. High tibial osteotomy:
            with a protocol approved by the Taipei Medical University   review  of  techniques  and  biomechanics.  J Healthc Eng.
            Joint Institutional Review Board (TMU-JIRB) (Approval   2019;2019:8363128.
            No.: N202006034).                                     doi: 10.1155/2019/8363128

            Consent for publication                            10.  Jang YW, Lim D, Seo H, Lee MC, Lee OS, Lee YS. Role of an
                                                                  anatomically contoured plate and metal block for balanced
            Not applicable.                                       stability between the implant and lateral hinge in open-

            Volume 10 Issue 1 (2024)                       505                          https://doi.org/10.36922/ijb.1584
   508   509   510   511   512   513   514   515   516   517   518