Page 86 - IJB-2-2

Structural, mechanical and in vitro studies on pulsed laser deposition of hydroxyapatite on additive manufactured polyamide substrate

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9290(06)83793-0
6. Asri R I, Harun W S, Hassan M A, et al., 2016, A review
of hydroxyapatite-based coating techniques: sol–gel and
electrochemical depositions on biocompatible metals.
Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Ma-
terials, vol.57: 95–108.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2015.11.031
7. Nishikawa H, Hasegawa T, Miyake A, et al., 2016, Re-
lationship between the Ca/P ratio of hydroxyapatite thin
films and the spatial energy distribution of the ablation
laser in pulsed laser deposition. Materials Letters, vol.165:
95–98.

Figure 8. Cell viability of live and dead cells. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2015.11.115
8. Bourne R B, Chesworth B M, Davis A M, et al., 2010,
studies reveal that the layer was composed of spheri- Patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty: who is
cal shaped particles of different sizes. Due to scatter- satisfied and who is not? Clinical Orthopaedics and
ing or spurious melting of the target, most of the par- Related Research, vol.468(1): 57–63.
ticles are deposited as droplets and an agglomeration http://dx.doi.org/10.1007%2Fs11999-009-1119-9
of nanocrystalline HA was seen. This heterogeneity in- 9. Mahoney O M and Kinsey T, 2010, Overhang of the
creases the surface roughness. The agglomerated ro- femoral component in total knee arthroplasty: risk fac-
ugh particles favour the better bone tissue integration. tors and clinical consequences. The Journal of Bone &
A higher percentage of crystalline HA was also ob- Joint Surgery, vol.92(5): 1115–1121.
served along with the substrate peak. Ca/P ratio of the http://dx.doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.H.00434
deposited HA was reasonably close to that of standard 10. D’Urso P S, Effeney D J, Earwaker W J, et al., 2000,
HA. Phosphate and carbonate content were induced Custom cranioplasty using stereolithography and acrylic.
during the deposition process along with some organic British Journal of Plastic Surgery, vol.53(3): 200–204.
groups. The layer shows considerably higher hardness http://dx.doi.org/10.1054/bjps.1999.3268
and modulus value with good adhesion property. In 11. Nair L S and Laurencin C T, 2007, Biodegradable po-
vitro results reveal that the HA coated layer shows a lymers as biomaterials. Progress in Polymer Science,
better cell viability. These coated implants are safe, vol.32(8): 762–798.
efficacious and cost effective and they can be used in http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2007.05.017
orthopaedic and dental application for fixing fractures, 12. Nagase Y and Horiguchi K, 2011, Biocompatible poly-
spinal reconstruction and soft tissue anchorage. amides and polyurethanes containing phospholipid moiety,
in Fazel R (ed), Biomedical Engineering — Frontiers
References and Challenges, InTech.
http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/22473
1. William D F, 1999, The Williams Dictionary of Bioma- 13. Cerardi A, Caneri M, Meneghello R, et al., 2013, Me-
terials, Liverpool University Press, Liverpool. chanical characterization of polyamide cellular struc-
2. Ramakrishna S, Mayer J, Wintermantel E, et al., 2001, tures fabricated using selective laser sintering technolo-
Biomedical applications of polymer-composite materials: gies. Materials & Design, vol.46: 910–915.
A review. Composites Science and Technology, vol.61(9): http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2012.11.042
1189–1224. 14. Rashia Begum S and Arumaikkannu G, 2013, Design,
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0266-3538(00)00241-4 analysis and fabrication of customised bone scaffold
3. Black J, 2005, Biological Performance of Materials: using RP technology. International Journal of Computer
Fundamentals of Biocompatibility, CRC Press, New Applications in Technology, vol.47(4): 364–369.
York. http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJCAT.2013.055329
4. Narayan R (ed), 2012, ASM Handbook, Volume 23: Ma- 15. Shtilman M I, 2003, New Concepts in Polymer Science.
terials for Medical Devices, ASM International, Ohio. Polymeric Biomaterials Part 1: Polymer Implants. CRC
5. Tyndyk M, Lohfeld S, Barron V, et al., 2006, Assess- Press, Boca Raton, FL, 52.
ment of SLS fabricated scaffolds for skeletal reconstruc- 16. Chandra R and Rustgi R, 1998, Biodegradable polymers.
tion in the spine. Journal of Biomechanics, vol.39(Suppl Progress in Polymer Science, vol.23(7): 1273–1335.
1): S216. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0079-6700(97)00039-7

92 International Journal of Bioprinting (2016)–Volume 2, Issue 2