Page 91 - IJB-2-2
P. 91

Weiguang Wang, Guilherme Ferreira Caetano, Wei-Hung Chiang, et al.

            temperature [29,30] . Its relevant properties are indicated   following  process parameters:  melting temperature
                                                                 o
            in Table 1.                                        (90 C); slice thickness (220 μm); screw rotation veloc-
                                                               ity (22 rpm) and deposition velocity (20 mm/s). PCL
                      Table 1. Material properties of PCL
                                                               and PCL/pristine  graphene  scaffolds containing diff-
                      Density             1.146 g/mL at 25°C   erent concentrations of graphene (0.25% wt, 0.50% wt
                                               o
               Melting point               58–60 C             and 0.75% wt) were produced using a screw-assisted
                                               o
               Glass transition temperature   ≈ –60 C          additive manufacturing system from RegenHU (3DD-
               Molecular weight (Mw)       50000 g/mol         iscovery, Switzerland). In this process, the material is
               Specific heat of vaporisation   1 kJ/g          molten in  the  liquefier tank,  pressed to the  barrier
                                                    3
               Solubility parameter (δ)    –9.43 (cal/cm )     screw  tank by  compressed  air, and extruded out thr-
                                                               ough a 330 μm nozzle. PCL/pristine graphene pellets
            Pristine Graphene                                  were initially prepared  by  melt blending.  Produced
            Pristine graphene was prepared via water-assisted liq-  scaffolds presented well dispersed pristine  graphene,
            uid  phase exfoliation  of graphite. Briefly,  50  mg   as previously reported using Raman spectroscopy and
                                                                                  [4]
            microcrystalline graphite powder (325 mesh, 99.995%   micro Raman mapping .
            pure,  purchased from Alfa Aesar)  was immersed in   2.3 Thermogravimetric Analysis
            N-methyl-2-pyrrolidone  (NMP)  mixture with a  0.2
            mass fraction of water.  The  initial concentration  of   The onset of thermal degradation  and  pristine gra-
                                      −1
            graphite was fixed at 5 mg mL  for exfoliation. NMP,   phene content in the scaffolds was assessed using a TA
            99% extra pure,  was  purchased from  ACROS OR-    Instruments Q500 TGA equipped with an evolved gas
            GANICS.  The  materials were batch sonicated for 6   analysis furnace. Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA)
                                                               was performed on neat PCL scaffolds as controls, and
            hours in a bath sonicator (Elma sonic P60H, Switzer-  pristine graphene loaded PCL scaffolds. Scans were
            land) at a fixed nominal power and frequency of 100   performed in an air atmosphere (flow at 60 mL/min)
            W and 37 kHz, respectively. Sample dispersions were   with a temperature range from room temperature to
            hanged on for overnight in between sonication and   560°C at a rate  of 10°C/min. Measurements were
            centrifugation, and were centrifuged at 3000 rpm for   taken using sample mass of 6 ± 1 mg in platinum pans.
            30 minutes using a Hettich, EBA20. The upper 75%   The weight losses of the PCL/pristine graphene com-
            of the colloidal supernatant were collected and dried   posite structures were monitored and used to calculate
            in an oven to yield the graphene nano-sheets.      the final pristine graphene contents.

            Melt-Blending Process                              2.4 Morphological Characterisation
            PCL/pristine  graphene blends were prepared accord-  Scanning electron  microscopy  (SEM)  was  used to
            ing to the following steps:                        investigate the morphology of produced scaffolds and
               PCL pellets were melted up to 70ºC;             to measure pore size (PS) and filament width (FW),
               Pristine graphene flakes were added to the polymer   by comparing obtained values with the initial design
            melt  at desired concentrations  (0.25% wt,  0.50% wt   parameters (Figure 1). SEM was conducted with a
            and 0.75% wt);                                     Quanta 200 SEM system, using an accelerating volt-
               The blend was physically mixed for 15 minutes to   age of 10 kV. All relevant dimensions were measured
            ensure good pristine graphene dispersion;          using the software Image J. The average and standard
               After mixing, the blended material was cool down   deviation obtained from 6 measurements are reported
            and cut into small pellets.                        for each scaffold.

            2.2 Scaffold Fabrication                           2.5 Apparent Water-in-air Contact Angle
            A three-dimensional block model was initially desig-  The contact angle indicates the wettability of the ma-
            ned in a computer-aided design (CAD) software (Sol-  terial surface, being an important parameter in order to
                                             o
                                         o
            idWorks, Dassault Systems). A 0 /90   lay-down pat-  understand the biological interaction between  the
            tern was adopted to obtain pores with a regular square   scaffolds and cells. The balance of forces regarding
            geometry while maintaining a  constant  filament dis-  the surface tension between liquid-vapour (γ ) for a
                                                                                                      lv
            tance of 680 μm. Scaffolds were produced using the   liquid drop and the interfacial tension between the solid
                                        International Journal of Bioprinting (2016)–Volume 2, Issue 2      97
   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96