Page 133 - IJB-10-2
P. 133

International Journal of Bioprinting                                  3D bioprinting for corneal regeneration




            and Technology of Hungary through the National     6.   Isaacson A, Swioklo S, Connon CJ. 3D bioprinting of a
            Research, Development and Innovation Fund, financed   corneal stroma equivalent. Exp Eye Res. 2018;173:188-193.
            under the TKP2021-EGA funding scheme. The funders      doi: 10.1016/j.exer.2018.05.010
            played no role in study design, data collection, analysis,   7.   Zhang B, Xue Q, Li J,  et al. 3D bioprinting for artificial
            publishing decisions, or manuscript preparation.      cornea: challenges and perspectives. Med Eng Phys. 2019;71:
                                                                  68-78.
            Conflict of interest                                  doi: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2019.05.002

            The authors declare no conflicts of interest.      8.   Sridhar MS,. Anatomy of cornea and ocular surface. Indian J
                                                                  Ophthalmol. 2018;66(2):190-194.
            Author contributions                                  doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_646_17
                                                               9.   Meek KM, Knupp C. Corneal structure and transparency.
            Conceptualization: Tamás Monostori, Zoltán Veréb      Prog Retin Eye Res. 2015;49:1-16.
            Funding acquisition: Zoltán Veréb                     doi: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2015.07.001
            Supervision: Zoltán Veréb
            Writing – original draft: Tamás Monostori          10.  Mobaraki M, Soltani M, Zare Harofte S, et al. Biodegradable
            Writing – review & editing: Diána Szűcs, Borbála Lovászi,   nanoparticle for cornea drug delivery: focus review.
                                                                  Pharmaceutics. 2020;12(12).
               Lajos Kemény, Zoltán Veréb
                                                                  doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics12121232
            Ethics approval and consent to participate         11.  Dua HS, Faraj LA, Branch MJ, et al. The collagen matrix
                                                                  of the human trabecular meshwork is an extension of the
            Not applicable.                                       novel pre-Descemet’s layer (Dua’s layer). Br J Ophthalmol.
                                                                  2014;98(5):691-697.
            Consent for publication                               doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2013-304593
            Not applicable.                                    12.  Ruan Y, Jiang SB, Musayeva A,  Pfeiffer N, Gericke A.
                                                                  Corneal epithelial stem cells-physiology, pathophysiology
            Availability of data                                  and therapeutic options. Cells. 2021;10(9).
                                                                  doi: 10.3390/cells10092302
            Not applicable.
                                                               13.  Secker GA, Daniels JT. Limbal epithelial stem cells of the
            References                                            cornea. In: Melton D, Cowan CA, eds. StemBook. Cambridge
                                                                  (MA): Harvard Stem Cell Institute; 2008.
                                                                  doi: 10.3824/stembook.1.48.1
            1.   Zare M, Javadi MA, Einollahi B, et al. Changing indications
               and surgical techniques for corneal transplantation between   14.  Collin HB, Ratcliffe J, Collin SP. The functional anatomy
               2004 and 2009 at a tertiary referral center. Middle East Afr J   of the cornea and anterior chamber in lampreys: insights
               Ophthalmol. 2012;19(3):323-329.                    from the pouched lamprey, Geotria australis (Geotriidae,
               doi: 10.4103/0974-9233.97941                       Agnatha). Front Neuroanat. 2021;15:786729.
                                                                  doi: 10.3389/fnana.2021.786729
            2.   Pandey AK, Mudgil N, Wadgave Y,  Mishra SS. Corneal
               transplantation during COVID-19 pandemic: need for   15.  West-Mays JA, Dwivedi DJ. The keratocyte: corneal stromal
               special considerations-A live review.  AIMS  Public  Health.   cell with variable repair phenotypes. Int J Biochem Cell Biol.
               2021;8(2):186-195.                                 2006;38(10):1625-1631.
               doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2021014                  doi: 10.1016/j.biocel.2006.03.010
            3.   Gaum L, Reynolds I, Jones MN,  Clarkson AJ, Gillan HL,   16.  Massoudi D,  Malecaze  F, Galiacy  SD. Collagens  and
               Kaye SB. Tissue and corneal donation and transplantation in   proteoglycans of the cornea: importance in transparency
               the UK. Br J Anaesth. 2012;108(Suppl 1): i43-47.   and visual disorders. Cell Tissue Res. 2016;363(2):337-349.
               doi: 10.1093/bja/aer398                            doi: 10.1007/s00441-015-2233-5
            4.   Hatou S, Shimmura  S. Review: corneal endothelial cell   17.  Zavala J, Lopez Jaime GR, Rodriguez Barrientos CA, Valdez-
               derivation methods from ES/iPS cells.  Inflamm Regen.   Garcia J. Corneal endothelium: developmental strategies for
               2019;39:19.                                        regeneration. Eye (Lond). 2013;27(5):579-588.
               doi: 10.1186/s41232-019-0108-y                     doi: 10.1038/eye.2013.15
            5.   Orash Mahmoud Salehi A, Heidari-Keshel S, Poursamar SA,   18.  Sie NM, Yam GH, Soh YQ, et al. Regenerative capacity of
               et al. Bioprinted membranes for corneal tissue engineering:   the corneal transition zone for endothelial cell therapy. Stem
               a review. Pharmaceutics. 2022;14(12):2797.         Cell Res Ther. 2020;11(1):523.
               doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics14122797                 doi: 10.1186/s13287-020-02046-2


            Volume 10 Issue 2 (2024)                       125                                doi: 10.36922/ijb.1669
   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138