Page 138 - IJB-10-2
P. 138

International Journal of Bioprinting                                  3D bioprinting for corneal regeneration




               collagen film-based corneal stroma equivalent. Tissue Eng.      doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0050993
               2006;12(6):1565-1575.                           127. Fuest M, Yam GHF, Mehta JS, Duarte Campos DF. Prospects
               doi: 10.1089/ten.2006.12.1565
                                                                  and challenges of translational corneal bioprinting.
            120. Mimura T, Amano S, Yokoo S, et al. Tissue engineering of   Bioengineering. 2020;7(3):71.
               corneal stroma with rabbit fibroblast precursors and gelatin      doi: 10.3390/bioengineering7030071
               hydrogels. Mol Vis. 2008;14:1819-1828.
                                                               128. Zhang B, Xue Q, Hu HY, et al. Integrated 3D bioprinting-
            121.  Wu J, Rnjak-Kovacina J, Du Y, Funderburgh ML, Kaplan DL,   based geometry-control strategy for fabricating corneal
               Funderburgh JL. Corneal stromal bioequivalents secreted on   substitutes. J Zhejiang Univ Sci B. 2019;20(12):945-959.
               patterned silk substrates. Biomaterials. 2014;35(12):3744-3755.      doi: 10.1631/jzus.B1900190
               doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.12.078
                                                               129. Bektas CK, Hasirci V. Cell loaded 3D bioprinted GelMA
            122. Gil ES, Mandal BB, Park SH,  Marchant JK, Omenetto   hydrogels for corneal stroma engineering.  Biomater Sci.
               FG, Kaplan DL. Helicoidal multi-lamellar features of   2020;8(1):438-449.
               RGD-functionalized silk biomaterials for corneal tissue      doi: 10.1039/c9bm01236b
               engineering. Biomaterials. 2010;31(34):8953-8963.   130. Kong B, Chen Y, Liu R,  et al. Fiber reinforced GelMA
               doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.08.017
                                                                  hydrogel to induce the regeneration of corneal stroma. Nat
            123. Fan  T,  Ma  X,  Zhao  J,  et  al.  Transplantation  of  tissue-  Commun. 2020;11(1):1435.
               engineered human corneal endothelium in cat models. Mol      doi: 10.1038/S41467-020-14887-9
               Vis. 2013;19:400-407.
                                                               131. Kim H, Park MN, Kim J,  Jang J, Kim H-K, Cho D-W.
            124. Honda N, Mimura T, Usui T, Amano S. Descemet stripping   Characterization  of  cornea-specific  bioink:  high
               automated endothelial keratoplasty using cultured corneal   transparency, improved in vivo safety. J Tissue Eng. 2019;10.
               endothelial cells in a rabbit model.  Arch Ophthalmol.      doi: 10.1177/2041731418823382
               2009;127(10):1321-1326.                         132. Kim  H, Jang  J,  Park J,  et  al. Shear-induced  alignment of
               doi: 10.1001/archophthalmol.2009.253
                                                                  collagen fibrils using 3D cell printing for corneal stroma
            125. Watanabe  R,  Hayashi  R,  Kimura  Y,  et  al.  A  novel  gelatin   tissue engineering. Biofabrication. 2019;11(3).
               hydrogel carrier sheet for corneal endothelial transplantation.      doi: 10.1088/1758-5090/Ab1a8b
               Tissue Eng Part A. 2011;17(17-18):2213-2219.    133. Kim KW, Lee SJ, Park SH, Kim JC. Ex vivo functionality
               doi: 10.1089/ten.TEA.2010.0568
                                                                  of 3D bioprinted corneal endothelium engineered with
            126. Levis HJ, Peh GSL, Toh KP, et al. Plastic compressed collagen   ribonuclease 5-overexpressing human corneal endothelial
               as a novel carrier for expanded human corneal endothelial   cells. Adv Healthc Mater. 2018;7(18):e1800398.
               cells for transplantation. PLoS One. 2012;7(11):e50993.      doi: 10.1002/adhm.201800398



































            Volume 10 Issue 2 (2024)                       130                                doi: 10.36922/ijb.1669
   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143