Page 198 - IJB-10-2
P. 198

International Journal of Bioprinting                                          Optimizing inkjet bioprinting































































            Figure 4. Droplet impact regimes on dry solid surfaces. (a) In the deposition regime, the droplet deforms and remains on the surface. This is the desirable
            regime for bioprinting applications. (b) The prompt splash regime is characterized by formation of small droplets at the contact line as the droplet spreads.
            (c) The corona splash regime is characterized by formation of a bowl-shaped thin liquid film, later forming a corona with small droplets detaching from
            its rim. Similar morphology is observed for impacts on liquid films. (d) In the receding breakup regime, droplets break up and are left behind the receding
            lamella during the retraction phase of the droplet impact. (e) In the partial rebound regime, part of the droplet remains on the surface. (f) In complete
            rebound regime, the entire droplet rebounds during the retraction phase of the droplet impact with the entire droplet leaving the substrate. Adapted with
                         68
            permission from ref.

            for droplet impact onto solid surfaces.  This flared film   appearance of a crown. This large increase in surface-
            contains primarily the liquid from the impacting drop   to-volume ratio (relative to the original drop) promotes
            as well as some of the target liquid. A capillary wave   rapid evaporation. Meanwhile, a cavity begins to develop
            train often propagates through the film and is always   below the original free liquid surface. The cavity enlarges
            perpendicular to the target surface. The top of the film   until it quickly takes the shape of a hemisphere, and
            also breaks up into jets and small droplets, forming an   the crown wall simultaneously begins to subside and


            Volume 10 Issue 2 (2024)                       190                                doi: 10.36922/ijb.2135
   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203