Page 226 - IJB-10-2
P. 226

International Journal of Bioprinting                                Property of scaffolds with different lattices




            Table 5. Calculated specific surface area and permeability values
                                                                                                    -10
                                                                                                       2
                                                    -1
                                          3
                                2
             Lattice      S (mm )   V  (mm )     (mm )       V max  (mm/s)  V mean  (mm/s)  (Pa)  K (10 m )
                                     S
             CPL          287.8366  75.0299      17.16       3.789       0.7499       5.2229    0.1755
             Diamond      867.1071  86.6514      10.01       4.694       0.8782       2.5574    0.7197
             Cuboctahedron  1125.7823  81.1718   13.87       4.989       0.8730       4.4625    0.2391
            Note: δ represents the specific surface area; S represents the internal surface area and refers to the interface between solid and pore in the porous structure; V  depicts the
                                                                                                   S
            volume of the porous structure; V max  represents the maximum flow velocity; V mean  is the average flow velocity; Δp is the pressure gradient when the fluid passes through the
            scaffold; and K is the permeability.
            although the distribution range of shear stress of CPL and   of porous scaffolds using CFD, Omar et al. and Li et al.
                                                                                                            52
                                                                                                 38
            cuboctahedron  scaffolds  was  relatively  broad  (0  to  >200   found that the value is in the tens of millipascals (MPa),
            MPa), the recorded shear stress of the scaffolds mostly   consistent with our experimental results, indicating that
            falls within the range of 0–20 MPa, whereas the shear   the simulation analysis has a good authenticity.
            stress  distribution  range  of  the  diamond  scaffold  was
            more concentrated (0–180 MPa), with the majority of the   3.4. Cell adhesion and proliferation
            recorded values falling within the range of 120–140 MPa.   After 3 h of co-culture with mouse MC3T3-E1 cells,
            It is evident that the variation of unit cells has a significant   acridine orange staining revealed a substantial level of cell
            impact on the value and distribution of shear stress in   attachment in Ti6Al4V scaffolds with various unit cells
            scaffolds. Through their shear stress distribution analysis   (Figure 7A). CCK8 assay results revealed that the number















































            Figure 7. Cell adhesion assay. (A) Acridine orange staining was performed qualitative determination of the number of cell adhesions. (B) SEM. (C) DAPI/
            phalloidin staining was performed to determine the level of adherence of MC3T3-E1 cells.


            Volume 10 Issue 2 (2024)                       218                                doi: 10.36922/ijb.1698
   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231