Page 227 - IJB-10-2
P. 227

International Journal of Bioprinting                                Property of scaffolds with different lattices










































            Figure 8. Results of cell experiments. (A) Quantitative analysis of cell adhesion density; (B) quantitative analysis of cell proliferation; (C) quantitative
            analysis of ALP activity; (d) quantitative analysis of calcium deposition. *P < 0.05.


            of adhered cells in diamond and CPL scaffolds was greater   period (14 days), the ALP activity of diamond scaffolds
            than that in cuboctahedron scaffold (P < 0.05, Figure 8A).   dramatically increased, which was significantly higher than
            Mice MC3T3-E1 cells adhered well to the three Ti6Al4V   that of CPL and cuboctahedron scaffolds (P < 0.05). At 7
            scaffolds after 3 days of culture, as determined by SEM. A   and 14 days, there was no significant change in ALP activity
            significant number of pseudopodia expanded while the   between CPL and cuboctahedron scaffolds (P > 0.05). In
            cells linked into sheets. Phalloidin/DAPI staining revealed   addition, calcium deposit increased considerably in the
            that the oval nucleus (blue fluorescence) and reticular   diamond scaffold, as compared with the other two scaffolds
            actin skeleton (red fluorescence) of MC3T3-E1 cells on the   (P < 0.05). Although the amount of calcium salt deposited
            three Ti6Al4V scaffolds were clearly visible, demonstrating   on the cuboctahedron scaffold was more than that on the
            excellent cell adhesion capabilities. Cell proliferation assay   CPL scaffold, there was no discernible difference between
            demonstrated  that  there  was  a  significant  difference  in   the two (P > 0.05). The expression of osteogenesis-related
            the number of MC3T3-E1 cells among the three scaffolds   genes was analyzed to further assess the benefits and
            after 3 days of culture (P  < 0.05). The highest number   drawbacks of various unit cell scaffolds in promoting the
            of MC3T3-E1 cells was seen on the diamond scaffold,   osteogenic differentiation of MC3T3-E1 cells (Figure 9).
            followed by the CPL scaffold (Figure 8B).          There were substantial changes in  ALP and  OCN gene
                                                               expression of MC3T3-E1 cells on the three scaffolds after
            3.5. Cell differentiation                          7 days of culture (P < 0.05), according to the results. The
            ALP  activity  and  calcium  deposit  levels  are  significant   cuboctahedron  scaffold  demonstrated  the  highest  ALP
            indications  of  osteogenic  differentiation  (Figure  8C   expression, while the diamond scaffold demonstrated
            and  D). At 7 days after induction, the ALP activity of   the highest  OCN expression. Although there was no
            diamond scaffolds was slightly higher than that of CPL   significant difference in  Runx2 gene expression between
            and cuboctahedron scaffolds, but there was no statistically   cuboctahedron and diamond scaffolds (P  > 0.05), their
            significant difference between the three scaffolds (P > 0.05).   expression levels still dwarfed the expression level in CPL
            Nevertheless, with the extension  of the differentiation   scaffold (P < 0.05). The expression of ALP and Runx2 genes

            Volume 10 Issue 2 (2024)                       219                                doi: 10.36922/ijb.1698
   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232