Page 278 - IJB-10-2
P. 278

International Journal of Bioprinting                                  Microfluidic spinning for neural models
















































            Figure 2. Manufacturing and characterization of composite hollow microfibers. (A) Histogram of the cross-sectional area of composite microfiber under
            different sample flow rates (n = 6). Data are expressed as mean ± SD. (B) Histogram of the cross-sectional area of composite microfiber under different
            sheath flow rates (n = 6). Data are expressed as mean ± SD. (C) FTIR Spectrum of GelMA, the mixture of CaA and GelMA (CaA+GelMA), and the
            prepared microfiber. (D) Fluorescence images of composite hollow microfibers with different core flow solutions. Scale bar = 100 µm. (E) 3D views of
            composite hollow microfibers with different core flow rates. Blue fluorescent PS microspheres were added to the sample flow for fluorescence photography.


            worth noting that when the sample and sheath flow rates   I2959 prepolymer solution for preparing the sample flow
            were too high or low, the formation of microfibers was   solution or 4% w/v CaCl  solution for preparing the sheath
                                                                                  2
            difficult to maintain. When the flow rate is too low, the   flow solution.
            fluid will fluctuate owing to the limitation of the perfusion   In addition, the compositions of the composite
            equipment; the microfibers cannot flow out of the channel   microfibers were characterized using FTIR spectroscopy,
            quickly after formation and can easily accumulate at the   as shown in Figure 2C. Pure GelMA (GelMA), a mixture
            outlet, leading to channel blockage and fiber deformation.   of GelMA and CaA (CaA+GelMA), and the prepared
            When the flow rate is high, the sample flow and sheath   composite microfibers (fibers) were analyzed. The
            laminar flow instability led to an uneven fiber morphology,   characteristic peak related to N-H bending vibration and
            and fast flow rate increased the sample flow consumption   C-N stretching vibration in GelMA occurred at about
            and waste. Therefore, after comparing the morphology   1550 cm  wave number, and due to the stretching of
                                                                      -1
            of  the  microfibers at  different  flow  rates,  the  optimal   C-O-C, the characteristic peak of CaA occurred at about
            conditions  for  the  rate  of  sample  and  sheath  flows  were   1030 cm  wave number, while the characteristic peaks
                                                                      -1
            determined to be 80 μL/min for the sample flow and 160   of fibers containing CaA and GelMA occurred at 1030
            μL/min for the sheath flow. The optimal compositions for   cm  and 1550 cm , respectively, a finding consistent with
                                                                 -1
                                                                             -1
            preparing the sample and sheath flows of the composite   previous reports. 26,47  This confirmed that the microfibers
            microfibers are 0.8% w/v NaA, 5% w/v GelMA, and 0.5%   contained GelMA.

            Volume 10 Issue 2 (2024)                       270                                doi: 10.36922/ijb.1797
   273   274   275   276   277   278   279   280   281   282   283