Page 315 - IJB-10-2
P. 315

International Journal of Bioprinting                                             3D-printed diabetic diet




            printing of Ink-M1-1 and Ink-M2-1, which are printability-  conditions such as type 2 diabetes and CKD.  CKD affects
                                                                                                  58
            optimized food ink formulation in their respective group,   30% of patients with type 1 diabetes and 40% of those with
            using a dual-nozzle direct ink writing (DIW) printer. All   type 2 diabetes.  A low-protein diet reduces intraglomerular
                                                                           7
            items were plated and served as they were printed (Figure   pressure by decreasing afferent arteriolar vasoconstriction,
            6E). Each item could be arbitrarily divided into different   thereby mitigating glomerular hyperfiltration and delaying
                                                                                                    59
            portions as desired in order to personalize nutritional   the progression of CKD toward kidney failure.  This study
            compositions according to the dietary requirements of   demonstrated that the  protein  content of  food  can  be
            diabetic patients with complications.              tailored to meet the specific DPI needs of patients afflicted
                                                               with diabetes-induced CKD. For instance, a typical 80 kg
               The focus of 3D food printing has undergone a significant   adult requires a DPI ranging from 0.8 to 1.3 g/kg of body
            transformation from merely enhancing the visual appeal to   weight, which translates to 64 to 104 g of protein per day.
            controlling and personalizing the nutritional composition   In contrast, diabetic patients with stage 3–5 CKD are
            of food.  Through multi-component collaborative 3D food   advised  to  adjust  their  DPI  to  0.6–0.8  g/kg  of  the  body
                  57
            printing, macro- and micro-nutrients in food items can be   weight per day,  amounting to 48 to 64 g of protein for
                                                                           60
            tuned to suit individual dietary needs. By slicing the same   an 80 kg CKD patient. For illustration, individuals without
            3D model into different proportions, the nutrient content   CKD would require approximately 470–760 g of the food
            can be varied, thereby enabling digital manufacturing of   item Ink-M1-1-49.0 per day, while CKD patients would
            3D-printed food for achieving personalized nutrition. As   have to reduce their food intake to 350–470 g to comply
            shown in Figure 6E, the dragon boat was 3D-printed with   by the DPI requirements if they choose the same food
            Ink-M1-1 and Ink-M2-1 at various ratios. The last figure   item. Alternatively, CKD patients may opt for 500–670 g
            in the name of each type of dragon boat represents the   of the food item, i.e., Ink-M1-1-100, which offers a lower
            percentage of Ink-M1-1 in the food item. For instance,   protein content per unit weight. Among these two food
            the dragon boat labeled as Ink-M1-1-49.0 comprises 49%   inks, which have similar protein content, Ink-M1-1-100
            Ink-M1-1 and 51% Ink-M2-1 by weight. The macronutrient   contains higher carbohydrate and caloric content than
            and calorie content of 100 g of the 3D-printed food with   Ink-M1-1-49.0, but its fat content is significantly lower.
            various percentage of Ink-M1-1 are shown in Table 3. The   Thus, patients are free to select the food ink that aligns with
            macronutrient content of each dragon boat was calculated   their unique nutritional and health requirements.
            and  listed  in  Table S4  (Supplementary  File)  based  on  a
            total weight of 8.2–9.1 g. The difference in weight primarily   Meanwhile, diabetic patients are at a higher risk
            resulted from the density difference between the two food   of developing oral ulcers compared with the general
            inks. Notably, the protein content almost doubled as   population. Patients suffering from oral ulcers often opt
            the proportion of Ink-M1-1 changed from 100% to 0%.   for liquid or soft foods to avoid the discomfort caused by
                                                               chewing and swallowing. However, such foods may lack
            Meanwhile, the fat content increased by almost 6-folds.   appeal in terms of appearance and texture, which can lead
            However, the content of total carbohydrates showed a   to food refusal and malnutrition. 61,62  Currently, texture-
            declining trend as the proportion of Ink-M1-1 reduced.
                                                               modified food is mainly aimed at elderly patients with
               Whole milk powder is a significant protein source in   dysphagia. Based on international data, the prevalence of
            daily diets and a major contributor to the production of   oropharyngeal dysphagia in the general population ranges
            endogenous advanced glycosylation end-products (AGEs).   from 2.3% to 16.0%.  In contrast, oral ulcers affect up to
                                                                               63
            Excessive  endogenous  AGEs  can  increase  the  risk  of   25% of the global population.  In spite of the high demand
                                                                                      64
            Table 3. Macronutrient and calorie content of 100 g of food 3D-printed with various proportions of Ink-M1-1

                                   Carbohydrate (g)    Protein (g)       Fat (g)         Energy (kJ)
             Ink-M1-1-100          25.88               9.59              1.55            659.93
             Ink-M1-1-90.2         25.33               10.37             2.24            689.43
             Ink-M1-1-75.2         24.49               11.55             3.29            734.31
             Ink-M1-1-49.0         23.01               13.63             5.15            813.09
             Ink-M1-1-30.6         21.97               15.09             6.44            868.30
             Ink-M1-1-9.8          20.79               16.74             7.91            930.80
             Ink-M1-1-0            20.24               17.52             8.61            960.30


            Volume 10 Issue 2 (2024)                       307                                doi: 10.36922/ijb.1862
   310   311   312   313   314   315   316   317   318   319   320