Page 333 - IJB-10-2

International Journal of Bioprinting Continuous gradient TPMS bone scaffold

Table 2. Model parameters. underwent three tests. The stress–strain curve obtained
n Y min Y max from these experiments is depicted in Figure 15.
G_2x10 3 2 10 Based on Figure 15, it is apparent that, at a constant
G_2x12 3 2 12 relative density, the three optimized models exhibit similar
G_4x12 3 4 12 ultimate strength to G_II. These models are therefore more

Figure 15. (a) G_2x10 stress–strain curve; (b) G_2x12 stress–strain curve; (c) G_4x12 stress–strain curve; and (d) optimized structural simulation curve.

Figure 16. Comparison of experimental and simulated values of optimized structure: (a) elastic modulus and (b) yield stress.

Volume 10 Issue 2 (2024) 325 doi: 10.36922/ijb.2306