Page 452 - IJB-10-2

International Journal of Bioprinting 3D-printed silicon nitride-PEEK implants

22. ASTM International. Standard Test Methods for Intervertebral doi: 10.1002/app.52886
Body Fusion Devices. PA, USA: ASTM; 2022. 33. Ill Yong K, Sugino A, Kikuta K, Ohtsuki C, Cho SB. Bioactive
doi: 10.1520/F2077-22
composites consisting of PEEK and calcium silicate powders.
23. Knott S, Curry D, Zhao N, et al. Staphylococcus aureus J Biomater Appl. 2008;24(2):105-118.
floating biofilm formation and phenotype in synovial fluid doi: 10.1177/0885328208094557
depends on albumin, fibrinogen, and hyaluronic acid. Front 34. Petrovic L, Pohle D, Münstedt H, Rechtenwald T, Schlegel
Microbiol. 2021;12:655873. KA, Rupprecht S. Effect of βTCP filled polyetheretherketone
doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.655873
on osteoblast cell proliferationin vitro. J Biomed Sci.
24. Wu S-H, Li Y, Zhang Y-Q, et al. Porous titanium-6 2006;13(1):41-46.
aluminum-4 vanadium cage has better osseointegration and doi: 10.1007/s11373-005-9032-z
less micromotion than a poly-ether-ether-ketone cage in 35. Fogel G, Martin N, Williams GM, et al. Choice of spinal
sheep vertebral fusion. Artif Organs. 2013;37(12):E191-E201. interbody fusion cage material and design influences
doi: 10.1111/aor.12153
subsidence and osseointegration performance. World
25. Quarles LD, Yohay DA, Lever LW, Caton R, Wenstrup RJ. Neurosurg. 2022;162:e626-e634.
Distinct proliferative and differentiated stages of murine doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2022.03.087
MC3T3-E1 cells in culture: an in vitro model of osteoblast 36. Bock RM, Jones EN, Ray DA, Bal BS, Pezzotti G, McEntire
development. J Bone Miner Res. 1992;7(6):683-692. BJ. Bacteriostatic behavior of surface modulated silicon
doi: 10.1002/jbmr.5650070613
nitride in comparison to polyetheretherketone and titanium.
26. Chen YH, Connelly JP, Florian C, Cui X, Pruett-Miller SM. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2017;105(5):1521-1534.
Short tandem repeat profiling via next-generation sequencing doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.35987
for cell line authentication. Dis Model Mech. 2023;16(10). 37. Pezzotti G, Marin E, Adachi T, et al. Incorporating Si3N4
doi: 10.1242/dmm.050150
into PEEK to produce antibacterial, osteocondutive, and
27. Wilkesmann S, Westhauser F, Fellenberg J. Combined radiolucent spinal implants. Macromolecular Bioscience.
fluorescence-based in vitro assay for the simultaneous 2018;18(6):1800033.
detection of cell viability and alkaline phosphatase activity doi: 10.1002/mabi.201800033
during osteogenic differentiation of osteoblast precursor 38. Marin E, Boschetto F, Zanocco M, et al. KUSA-A1
cells. Methods Protoc. 2020;3(2). mesenchymal stem cells response to PEEK-Si3N4
doi: 10.3390/mps3020030
composites. Mater Today Chem. 2020;17:100316.
28. Peck JH, Sing DC, Nagaraja S, Peck DG, Lotz JC, Dmitriev doi: 10.1016/j.mtchem.2020.100316
AE. Mechanical performance of cervical intervertebral body 39. Hu G, Zhu Y, Xu F, et al. Comparison of surface properties,
fusion devices: a systematic analysis of data submitted to the cell behaviors, bone regeneration and osseointegration
Food and Drug Administration. J Biomech. 2017;54:26-32. between nano tantalum/PEEK composite and nano
doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2017.01.032
silicon nitride/PEEK composite. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed.
29. Monich PR, Henriques B, Novaes de Oliveira AP, Souza 2022;33(1):35-56.
JCM, Fredel MC. Mechanical and biological behavior of doi: 10.1080/09205063.2021.1974812
biomedical PEEK matrix composites: A focused review. 40. Breijyeh Z, Jubeh B, Karaman R. Resistance of gram-negative
Mater Lett. 2016;185:593-597. bacteria to current antibacterial agents and approaches to
doi: 10.1016/j.matlet.2016.09.005
resolve it. Molecules. 2020;25(6).
30. Luo C, Liu Y, Peng B, et al. PEEK for oral applications: recent doi: 10.3390/molecules25061340
advances in mechanical and adhesive properties. Polymers. 41. Dai Y, Guo H, Chu L, et al. Promoting osteoblasts
2023;15(2):386. responses in vitro and improving osteointegration in
doi: 10.3390/polym15020386
vivo through bioactive coating of nanosilicon nitride
31. Manzoor F, Golbang A, Jindal S, et al. 3D printed PEEK/HA on polyetheretherketone. J Orthop Translat. 2020;24:
composites for bone tissue engineering applications: effect of 198-208.
material formulation on mechanical performance and bioactive doi: 10.1016/j.jot.2019.10.011
potential. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2021;121:104601. 42. Xu Z, Wu H, Wang F, et al. A hierarchical nanostructural
doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2021.104601
coating of amorphous silicon nitride on polyetheretherketone
32. Javaid S, Dey M, Matzke C, Gupta S. Synthesis and with antibacterial activity and promoting responses of
characterization of engineered PEEK‐based composites for rBMSCs for orthopedic applications. J Mater Chem B.
enhanced tribological and mechanical performance. J Appl 2019;7(39):6035-6047.
Polym Sci. 2022;139(39):e52886. doi: 10.1039/C9TB01565E

Volume 10 Issue 2 (2024) 444 doi: 10.36922/ijb.2124