Page 85 - IJB-10-2

International Journal of Bioprinting Advancements in 3D printing

86. Kim DI, Song S, Jang S, et al. Untethered gripper-type 97. Rieu J, Goeuriot P. Ceramic composites for biomedical
hydrogel millirobot actuated by electric field and magnetic applications. Clin Mater. 1993;12(4):211-217.
field. Smart Mater Struct. 2020;29(8):085024. doi: 10.1016/0267-6605(93)90075-I
doi: 10.1088/1361-665x/ab8ea4
98. Swarte JC, Li YN, Hu SX, et al. Gut microbiome dysbiosis
87. Peng XW, Peng Q, Wu M, et al. A pH and temperature is associated with increased mortality after solid organ
dual-responsive microgel-embedded, adhesive, and tough transplantation. Sci Transl Med. 2022;14(660):eabn7566.
hydrogel for drug delivery and wound healing. ACS Appl doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.abn7566
Mater Interfaces. 2023;15(15):19560-19573. 99. Duneton C, Winterberg PD, Ford ML. Activation and
doi: 10.1021/acsami.2c21255
regulation of alloreactive T cell immunity in solid organ
88. Youness RA, Tag El-deen DM, Taha MA . A review on transplantation. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2022;18(10):663-676.
calcium silicate ceramics: properties, limitations, and doi: 10.1038/s41581-022-00600-0
solutions for their use in biomedical applications. Silicon. 100. Xu KL, Han Y, Huang YY, Wei P, Yin J, Jiang JY. The
2023;15(6):2493-2505. application of 3D bioprinting in urological diseases. Mater
doi: 10.1007/s12633-022-02207-3
Today Bio. 2022;100388.
89. Shu CQ, Qin C, Chen L, et al. Metal‐organic framework doi: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2022.100388
functionalized bioceramic scaffolds with antioxidative 101. Zennifer A, Manivannan S, Sethuraman S, Kumbar SG,
activity for enhanced osteochondral regeneration. Adv Sci.
2023;10(13):6875-6888. Sundaramurthi D. 3D bioprinting and photocrosslinking:
doi: 10.1002/advs.202206875 emerging strategies & future perspectives. Biomater Adv.
2022;134:112576-112599.
90. Kost J, Huwyler J, Puchkov M. Calcium phosphate doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2021.112576
microcapsules as multifunctional drug delivery devices. Adv
Funct Mater. 2023;202303333. 102. Bose S, Roy M, Bandyopadhyay A. Recent advances in
doi: 10.1002/adfm.202303333 bone tissue engineering scaffolds. Trends Biotechnol.
2012;30(10):546-554.
91. Li M, Jiang JW, Liu WB, et al. Bioadaptable bioactive glass-β- doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2012.07.005
tricalcium phosphate scaffolds with TPMS-gyroid structure
by stereolithography for bone regeneration. J Mater Sci 103. Bose S, Vahabzadeh S, Bandyopadhyay A. Bone
Technol. 2023;155:54-65. tissue engineering using 3D printing. Mater Today.
doi: 10.1016/j.jmst.2023.01.025 2013;16(12):496-504.
doi: 10.1016/j.mattod.2013.11.017
92. Feng YHZ, Wu D, Knaus J, et al. A bioinspired gelatin–
amorphous calcium phosphate coating on titanium 104. Ma ZC, Zhang YL, Han B, et al. Femtosecond laser
implant for bone regeneration. Adv Healthc Mater. 2023; programmed artificial musculoskeletal systems. Nat
3411-3423. Commun. 2020;11(1):4536-4545.
doi: 10.1002/adhm.202203411 doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-18117-0
105. Huang HJ, Xing WR, Zeng CJ, Huang WH. Pararectus approach
93. Yuan G, Xu YN, Bai XP, et al. Autophagy-targeted
calcium phosphate nanoparticles enable transarterial combined with three-dimensional printing for anterior plate
chemoembolization for enhanced cancer therapy. ACS Appl fixation of sacral fractures. Injury. 2021;52(10):2719-2724.
Mater Interfaces. 2023;15(9):11431-11443. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2020.03.049
doi: 10.1021/acsami.2c18267 106. Strehin I, Nahas Z, Arora K, Nguyen T, Elisseeff J. A versatile
pH sensitive chondroitin sulfate-PEG tissue adhesive and
94. Zhang YG, Li JP, Soleimani M, et al. Biodegradable elastic
sponge from nanofibrous biphasic calcium phosphate hydrogel. Biomaterials. 2010;31(10):2788-2797.
ceramic as an advanced material for regenerative medicine. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.12.033
Adv Funct Mater. 2021;31(40):2911-2923. 107. Decarli MC, Seijas-Gamardo A, Morgan FLC, et al.
doi: 10.1002/adfm.202102911 Bioprinting of stem cell spheroids followed by post-printing
chondrogenic differentiation for cartilage tissue engineering.
95. Bartmański M, Rościszewska M, Wekwejt M, Ronowska A,
Nadolska-Dawidowska M, Mielewczyk-Gryń A. Properties Adv Healthc Mater. 2023;2203021.
of new composite materials based on hydroxyapatite ceramic doi: 10.1002/adhm.202203021
and cross-linked gelatin for biomedical applications. Int J 108. Liu DH, Nie W, Li DJ, et al. 3D printed PCL/SrHA scaffold for
Mol Sci. 2022;23(16):9083-9097. enhanced bone regeneration. Chem Eng J. 2019;362:269-279.
doi: 10.3390/ijms23169083 doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2019.01.015
96. Vaiani L, Boccaccio A, Uva AE, et al. Ceramic materials 109. Yan YF, Chen H, Zhang HB, et al. Vascularized 3D printed
for biomedical applications: an overview on properties and scaffolds for promoting bone regeneration. Biomaterials.
fabrication processes. J Funct Biomater. 2023;14(3):146-167. 2019;190:97-110.
doi: 10.3390/jfb14030146 doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.10.033

Volume 10 Issue 2 (2024) 77 doi: 10.36922/ijb.1752