Page 257 - IJB-10-3
P. 257

International Journal of Bioprinting                                 Bioprinting organoids for toxicity testing




            in 4% formaldehyde for 30 min, washed, and stained with   The following antibodies and dilution ratios were
            red neutral lipid dye (Invitrogen, H34476) according to   employed: HNF4α (1:200, Abcam, ab92378), FOXA2 (1:200,
            the manufacturer’s instructions. The nucleus was stained   Abcam, ab256493), ALB (1:100, Abcam, ab83465), CD31
            with DAPI. The DOs were visualized by means of confocal   (1:100,  Cell Signaling Technology, 89C2),  MRP2  (1:100,
            microscopy. The fluorescence intensity of neutral lipids was   Abcam, ab3373), αSMA (1:100), COL1A1 (1:100, Cell
            analyzed using Nikon NIS-Elements AR. The fluorescence   Signaling Technology, 72026), F-actin (Invitrogen, A12379),
            intensity of neutral lipid dye in each slide was normalized   Alexa Fluor® 594-conjugated secondary antibody (1:1000,
            to the DAPI area. Then, the fluorescence intensity of   Abcam, ab150080), and Alexa Fluor® 488-conjugated
            neutral lipid staining was counted by finding the average of   secondary antibody (1:1000, Abcam, ab150113). The nuclei
            all the slides in three independent experiments.   were stained with DAPI (Sigma, D9542).

            2.7.2. Indocyanine green uptake assay              2.9. Total RNA isolation and qRT-PCR analysis
            The indocyanine green (ICG) uptake assay was performed   The DOs were harvested from microspheres with a de-
            by adding 1 mg/mL ICG to the medium for 30 min. ICG   crosslinking solution. The DOs were resolved in TRIzol
            was wholly released from the cells after 7 h. ICG uptake and   (Life Technologies, USA, 15596018). Total RNA samples
            release images were captured from over 20 microspheres   were isolated according to the TRIzol manufacturer’s
            using an inverted optical microscope. Image-Pro software   specifications. RNA (2  µg) was reverse-transcribed into
            was used to calculate the uptake ratio as the Integrated   cDNA with the RT Reagent Kit with gDNA Eraser (Takara,
            Optical Density (IOD) of the microsphere divided by the   Japan, RR047A). Quantitative polymerase chain reaction
            area of the microsphere.                           (qPCR) was performed using a SYBR Premix Ex Taq kit
            2.8. Immunofluorescence staining                   (Takara, Japan, RR420A) on a QuantStudio 6 Flex System
            2.8.1. Staining of cultured planner cells          (Thermo, USA). The PCR primers are listed in Table S1
            hiPSC-derived HE and EPC were fixed with 4%        (Supplementary File).
            paraformaldehyde for 15 min and blocked with Dulbecco’s   2.10. RNA-seq
            phosphate-buffered saline (DPBS; Solarbio, D1040)   The samples for RNA-seq were collected in TRIzol. RNA
            containing 5% goat serum (Solarbio, China, SL038) and   isolation, cDNA library construction, sequencing, and
            0.1% Triton X-100 (Amresco, USA, 0694-1 L) for 1 h at   primary analysis were performed at Novogene (Tianjin,
            room temperature. Then, the cells were incubated with   China). Briefly, 1 µg of RNA per sample was used as input
            primary antibodies for 1 h and secondary antibodies for 30   material for the RNA sample preparations. Following the
            min at room temperature.                           manufacturer’s recommendations, sequencing libraries
            2.8.2. Staining of DOs                             were generated using the NEBNext® UltraTM RNA Library
            The DOs-laden microspheres were incubated in a de-  Prep Kit for Illumina® (NEB, USA), and index codes were
            crosslinking solution (150 mM sodium chloride containing   added to attribute sequences to each sample. After being
            55 mM sodium citrate and 20 mM EDTA), and DOs were   analyzed with an Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer, the RNA was
            harvested by gravitational settlement.             found to be of good standard quality.
               The  harvested  DOs  or  DOs-laden  microspheres   Sequencing was performed with an Illumina NovaSeq
            were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 45 min at   platform, and 150 bp paired-end reads were generated.
            4°C, washed three times with 0.1% v/v Hanks (Solarbio,   Reads were filtered and mapped to the reference genome
            H1025)-Tween-20, and blocked with Hanks containing   sequence with HISAT2 v2.0.5. Feature Counts v1.5.0-p3
            2% BSA and 0.1% Triton X-100 for 15 min at 4°C. Then,   was used to count the read numbers mapped to each gene.
            the samples were incubated with primary antibodies   The fragments per kilobase of exon per million fragments
            overnight at 4°C. After being washed three times, the DOs   mapped (FPKM) method was used to calculate gene
            were continuously incubated with secondary antibodies   expression levels. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs)
            overnight at 4°C. Fluorescent images were taken with an   with fold change ≥ 1.25 and FDR q-value <0.05 were
            LSCM (Nikon, Z2).                                  calculated using the DESeq2 R package (1.16.1).
               The fluorescent intensities of COL1A1, αSMA, and   Gene Ontology (GO), Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes
            F-actin  were analyzed by Nikon NIS-Elements AR. The   and  Genomes  (KEGG),  Reactome,  and  DisGeNET
            fluorescence intensity in each slide was normalized to   enrichment analyses of DEGs were implemented using the
            the DAPI area. The fluorescence intensity of each target   clusterProfiler R package. Significantly enriched GO and
            protein was calculated by determining the average of all   KEGG terms were determined based on a corrected P <0.05.
            the slides in three independent experiments.       Based on KEGG, Reactome, and DisGeNET datasets, gene

            Volume 10 Issue 3 (2024)                       249                                doi: 10.36922/ijb.1403
   252   253   254   255   256   257   258   259   260   261   262