Page 40 - IJB-4-2
P. 40

Bioprinting of artificial blood vessels

           table 2. Characteristics of various types of veins.
                                                           veins
               vessel    Postcapillary venule Muscular venule  Small vein  Medium vein        large vein
           Diameter      10–50 μm       50–100 μm    0.1–1 mm        1–10 mm          >10 mm

           tunica intima   Endothelium  Endothelium only  Endothelium  Same as small vein except Same as small vein
           (innermost)                                               with internal elastic
                         Pericytes                   Connective tissue  membrane (present in
                                                                     some cases)
                                                     Smooth muscle
           tunica Media   None          Smooth muscle   Smooth muscle   Smooth muscle  Smooth muscle (2–15 layers)
           (middle)                     (1–2 cells thick)  (continuous with tunica
                                                     intima; 2–3 layers)  Collagen fibers  Collagen fibers
           tunica Adventitia  None      Thicker than tunica  Same as muscular   Same as muscular venule Much thicker than tunica media
           (outermost)                  media        venule
                                                                                      Connective tissue
                                        Connective tissue
                                                                                      Few elastic fibers
                                        Few elastic fibers
                                                                                      Longitudinal smooth muscle bundles
                                                                                      Myocardial sleeves (present in
                                                                                      superior and inferior vena cava,
                                                                                      pulmonary trunk)

           2. Potential of Bioprinting                         gel property of bioinks is a critical factor in ensuring
                                                               printability, therefore restricting the availability of many
           Bioprinting can be defined as the fabrication of    biomaterials . Nevertheless, extrusion-based technique
                                                                         [14]
           bioengineered scaffolds or structures by addictive   has been shown to be versatile in depositing a wide
           manufacturing of biomaterials and other biologics by   range of bioinks such as hydrogels, micro-carriers, tissue
           using a computer aided layer with layer deposition   strands and decellularized matrix components [15–18] .
           approach. Introduction of bioprinting in medical research   A recent review article by Ozbolat and Hospodiuk
           has greatly revolutionize tissue engineering research and   articulated the characteristics of bioprintable bioinks
           created endless possibilities awaiting to be explored.   and their applicability and performance in extrusion-
           Bioprinting allows rapid fabrication of scaffolds with   based technique [19] . In addition, readers can refer to
           precise control over porosity, internal architectures and   several other review articles regarding hydrogels in
           external structures, all of which can allow us to better   tissue engineering [20,21] . Extrusion-based technique has
           mimic native in vivo micro-environments [13] . There are   gradually improved over time and can now be classified
           currently many commercialized bioprinters, of which   into direct and indirect extrusion techniques. Direct
           bioprinting techniques can be categorized into the   extrusion involves bioprinting of cell-laden hydrogels
           following categories: extrusion-based, droplet-based and   directly into desired structures and cross linked to allow
           laser-based bioprinting techniques.                 complete retention of structures. Indirect extrusion
            The main principle of extrusion-based technique    involves having an additional sacrificial material that
           lies mainly on its ability to deposit continuous strands   usually has certain contrasting physical or chemical
           of materials via a pressurized nozzle. Synthetic or   properties as the intended hydrogel. The sacrificial
           biocompatible materials can be used for this method and   material is usually a stable biomaterial mainly used for
           can be used for fabricating structures with resolutions   supportive purposes during bioprinting, after which it
           of up to several hundred microns [11] . A recent novel   is removed, leaving behind the desired scaffold with
           extrusion-based technique involves encapsulating    intended structural networks. Indirect extrusion is largely
           cells in biocompatible hydrogels and exploit the shear   based on the basis that highly biocompatible bioinks
           thinning properties of hydrogels for bioprinting. For   generally have low printability and low mechanical
           such cases, the bioink should be able to remain stable   strength before and during printing. Various cross-
           in the syringe and only changes viscosity when being   linking techniques such as chemical cross-linking exists
           pressurized through a nozzle. After which, the bioprinted   to strengthen scaffolds, but such techniques are usually
           scaffold would have to go through certain physical or   applied post printing. Therefore, it is difficult to extrude
           chemical crosslinking processes to ensure gelation of   bioinks into desired shapes and structures without
           hydrogel and retention of geometrical structure. Sol-  adequate support. At this current stage of extrusion-based

           4                           International Journal of Bioprinting (2018)–Volume 4, Issue 2
   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45