Page 7 - IJB-4-2
P. 7

PERSPECTIVE ARTICLES

           3D bioprinting processes: A perspective on classification

           and terminology



           Jia Min Lee, Swee Leong Sing, Miaomiao Zhou, Wai Yee Yeong     *
           Singapore Centre for 3D Printing, School of Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering, Nanyang Technological University,
           Singapore


           Abstract: This article aims to provide further classification of cell-compatible bioprinting processes and examine the
           concept of 3D bioprinting within the general technology field of 3D printing. These technologies are categorized into four
           distinct process categories, namely material jetting, vat photopolymerization, material extrusion and free-form spatial
           printing. Discussion will be presented on the definition of classification with example of techniques grouped under the same
           category. The objective of this article is to establish a basic framework for standardization of process terminology in order to
           accelerate the implementation of bioprinting technologies in research and commercial landscape.
           Keywords: additive manufacturing; 3D bioprinting; material jetting; material extrusion; vat photopolymerization;
           bioassembly
           *Correspondence to: Wai Yee Yeong, Singapore Centre for 3D Printing, School of Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering, Nanyang Technological
           University, N3.1-B2C-03, 50 Nanyang Avenue, Singapore 639798; wyyeong@ntu.edu.sg

           Received: June 1, 2018; Accepted: June 25, 2018; Published Online: July 3, 2018
           Citation: Lee J M, Sing S L, Zhou M, et al., 2018, 3D bioprinting processes: A perspective on classification and
           terminology. Int J Bioprint, 4(2): 151. http://dx.doi.org/10.18063/IJB.v4i2.151

                                                                                         [2]
           1. Introduction                                     racterization of the processes . Several reviews have
                                                               also highlighted current bioprinting technologies and
           Biofabrication, bioprinting, and bioassembly are three   compared the print resolution between the different
           terms that have received great attention in recent   technologies [2–5] .  These  published  articles  have
           years [1,2] . The definition of biofabrication has been   provided the necessary basic clarity on the definition of
           highlighted as “the automated generation of biologically   biofabrication. However, much work is still needed to
           functional products with structural organization from   further categorize the 3D bioprinting process in terms of
           living cells, bioactive molecules, biomaterials, cell   processes and terminology.
           aggregates such as microtissues, hybrid cell-material   The field of 3D bioprinting started from the idea of
                                                        [1]
           constructs through bioprinting or bioassembly” .    combining additive manufacturing (AM) or 3D printing
           Defining terminologies and technologies in the field of   which uses layer-by-layer fabrication techniques with
           biofabrication is much needed to establish a framework   living organisms and biomaterials to produce complex
           and provide a reference map to the research community.   tissues in vitro . While there is much advancement
                                                                            [6]
           Recently, researchers proposed a refined working    in this field, the academia and industry have seen a
           definition of Biofabrication, including Bioprinting   lower adaptation rate of 3D bioprinting compared to
           and Bioassembly as complementary stra tegies within   AM due to the lack of clarity in processes, materials
           Biofabrication. While Moroni et al. established a   and applications. There exist some form of mismatch
           guide for terminology in biofabrication and defined the   between these three.
           efficiency of the respective biofabrication technologies   This article aims to provide a classification of 3D
           using a metric system called spatial resolution/time   bio printing processes that have been reviewed and
           for manufacturing (RTM) ratio as a quantitative cha-  described in detail in numerous reviews [3,7,8] . The details

           3D bioprinting processes: A perspective on classification and terminology. © 2018 Lee J M, et al. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms
           of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), permitting all non-
           commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
                                                                                                             1
   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12