Page 360 - IJB-10-4
P. 360
International Journal of Bioprinting Stiffness of scaffold-mediated immune response
2. Matai I, Kaur G, Seyedsalehi A, McClinton A, Laurencin combined effect of stiffness and porosity in the modulation
CT. Progress in 3D bioprinting technology for tissue/organ of macrophage polarization. Adv Healthc Mater. 2021;11(1).
regenerative engineering. Biomaterials. 2020;226:119536. doi: 10.1002/adhm.202101415
doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.119536
15. Sridharan R, Cavanagh B, Cameron AR, Kelly DJ, O’Brien FJ.
3. Taraballi F, Sushnitha M, Tsao C, et al. Biomimetic tissue Material stiffness influences the polarization state, function
engineering: tuning the immune and inflammatory and migration mode of macrophages. Acta Biomater.
response to implantable biomaterials. Adv Healthc Mater. 2019;89:47-59.
2018;7(17):e1800490. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2019.02.048
doi: 10.1002/adhm.201800490
16. Previtera ML, Sengupta A. Substrate stiffness regulates
4. Crupi A, Costa A, Tarnok A, Melzer S, Teodori L. proinflammatory mediator production through TLR4
Inflammation in tissue engineering: the Janus between Activity in macrophages. PLoS One. 2015;10(12):
engraftment and rejection. Eur J Immunol. 2015;45(12): e0145813.
3222-3236. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0145813
doi: 10.1002/eji.201545818
17. He H, Xiao Z, Zhou Y, et al. Zwitterionic poly(sulfobetaine
5. Abaricia JO, Farzad N, Heath TJ, Simmons J, Morandini L, methacrylate) hydrogels with optimal mechanical properties
Olivares-Navarrete R. Control of innate immune response for improving wound healing in vivo. J Mater Chem B.
by biomaterial surface topography, energy, and stiffness. 2019;7(10):1697-1707.
Acta Biomater. 2021;133:58-73. doi: 10.1039/c8tb02590h
doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2021.04.021
18. Xing X, Wang Y, Zhang X, et al. Matrix stiffness‐mediated
6. Locati M, Curtale G, Mantovani A. Diversity, mechanisms, effects on macrophages polarization and their LOXL2
and significance of macrophage plasticity. Annu Rev Pathol. expression. FEBS J. 2020;288(11):3465-3477.
2020;15(1):123-147. doi: 10.1111/febs.15566
doi: 10.1146/annurev-pathmechdis-012418-012718
19. Chen M, Zhang Y, Zhou P, et al. Substrate stiffness modulates
7. Chen S, Saeed A, Liu Q, et al. Macrophages in bone marrow-derived macrophage polarization through NF-
immunoregulation and therapeutics. Signal Transduct kappaB signaling pathway. Bioact Mater. 2020;5(4):880-890.
Target Ther. 2023;8(1):207. doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2020.05.004
doi: 10.1038/s41392-023-01452-1
20. Ng WL, Huang X, Shkolnikov V, Suntornnond R, Yeong
8. Al Sadoun H. Macrophage phenotypes in normal and WY. Polyvinylpyrrolidone-based bioink: influence of bioink
diabetic wound healing and therapeutic interventions. Cells. properties on printing performance and cell proliferation
2022;11(15). during inkjet-based bioprinting. Bio-Des Manuf.
doi: 10.3390/cells11152430 2023;6(6):676-690.
9. Wynn TA, Vannella KM. Macrophages in tissue repair, doi: 10.1007/s42242-023-00245-3
regeneration, and fibrosis. Immunity. 2016;44(3):450-462. 21. Li X, Liu B, Pei B, et al. Inkjet bioprinting of biomaterials.
doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2016.02.015 Chem Rev. 2020;120(19):10793-10833.
10. Balabiyev A, Podolnikova NP, Kilbourne JA, et al. Fibrin doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00008
polymer on the surface of biomaterial implants drives the 22. Chartrain NA, Williams CB, Whittington AR. A review on
foreign body reaction. Biomaterials. 2021;277. fabricating tissue scaffolds using vat photopolymerization.
doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2021.121087 Acta Biomater. 2018;2018(74):90-111.
11. Anderson JM, Rodriguez A, Chang DT. Foreign body doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2018.05.010
reaction to biomaterials. Semin Immunol. 2008;20(2): 23. Ramesh S, Harrysson OLA, Rao PK, et al. Extrusion
86-100. bioprinting: recent progress, challenges, and future
doi: 10.1016/j.smim.2007.11.004 opportunities. Bioprinting. 2021;21.
12. Lee SC, Gillispie G, Prim P, Lee SJ. Physical and chemical doi: 10.1016/j.bprint.2020.e00116
factors influencing the printability of hydrogel-based 24. Vijayavenkataraman S, Yan WC, Lu WF, Wang CH, Fuh
extrusion bioinks. Chem Rev. 2020;120(19):10834-10886. JYH. 3D bioprinting of tissues and organs for regenerative
doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00015
medicine. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2018;132:296-332.
13. Bu W, Wu Y, Ghaemmaghami AM, Sun H, Mata A. Rational doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2018.07.004
design of hydrogels for immunomodulation. Regen Biomater. 25. Labowska MB, Cierluk K, Jankowska AM, Kulbacka J,
2022;9:rbac009. Detyna J, Michalak I. A review on the adaption of alginate-
doi: 10.1093/rb/rbac009
gelatin hydrogels for 3D cultures and bioprinting. Materials.
14. Camarero‐Espinosa S, Carlos‐Oliveira M, Liu H, Mano JF, 2021;14(4).
Bouvy N, Moroni L. 3D printed dual‐porosity scaffolds: the doi: 10.3390/ma14040858
Volume 10 Issue 4 (2024) 352 doi: 10.36922/ijb.2874

