Page 360 - IJB-10-4
P. 360

International Journal of Bioprinting                           Stiffness of scaffold-mediated immune response




            2.   Matai I, Kaur G, Seyedsalehi A, McClinton A, Laurencin   combined effect of stiffness and porosity in the modulation
               CT. Progress in 3D bioprinting technology for tissue/organ   of macrophage polarization. Adv Healthc Mater. 2021;11(1).
               regenerative engineering. Biomaterials. 2020;226:119536.      doi: 10.1002/adhm.202101415
               doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.119536
                                                               15.  Sridharan R, Cavanagh B, Cameron AR, Kelly DJ, O’Brien FJ.
            3.   Taraballi F, Sushnitha M, Tsao C, et al. Biomimetic tissue   Material stiffness influences the polarization state, function
               engineering: tuning the immune and inflammatory    and migration mode of macrophages.  Acta Biomater.
               response to implantable biomaterials.  Adv Healthc Mater.   2019;89:47-59.
               2018;7(17):e1800490.                               doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2019.02.048
               doi: 10.1002/adhm.201800490
                                                               16.  Previtera ML, Sengupta A. Substrate stiffness regulates
            4.   Crupi  A,  Costa  A,  Tarnok  A,  Melzer  S,  Teodori  L.   proinflammatory mediator  production through TLR4
               Inflammation in tissue engineering: the Janus between   Activity in macrophages.  PLoS One.  2015;10(12):
               engraftment and rejection.  Eur J Immunol.  2015;45(12):   e0145813.
               3222-3236.                                         doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0145813
               doi: 10.1002/eji.201545818
                                                               17.  He H, Xiao Z, Zhou Y, et al. Zwitterionic poly(sulfobetaine
            5.   Abaricia JO, Farzad N, Heath TJ, Simmons J, Morandini L,   methacrylate) hydrogels with optimal mechanical properties
               Olivares-Navarrete R. Control of innate immune response   for improving wound healing in vivo.  J Mater Chem B.
               by biomaterial surface topography, energy, and stiffness.   2019;7(10):1697-1707.
               Acta Biomater. 2021;133:58-73.                     doi: 10.1039/c8tb02590h
               doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2021.04.021
                                                               18.  Xing X, Wang Y, Zhang X, et al. Matrix stiffness‐mediated
            6.   Locati M, Curtale G, Mantovani A. Diversity, mechanisms,   effects on macrophages polarization and their LOXL2
               and significance of macrophage plasticity. Annu Rev Pathol.   expression. FEBS J. 2020;288(11):3465-3477.
               2020;15(1):123-147.                                doi: 10.1111/febs.15566
               doi: 10.1146/annurev-pathmechdis-012418-012718
                                                               19.  Chen M, Zhang Y, Zhou P, et al. Substrate stiffness modulates
            7.   Chen S, Saeed A, Liu Q, et al. Macrophages in    bone marrow-derived macrophage polarization through NF-
               immunoregulation and therapeutics.  Signal Transduct   kappaB signaling pathway. Bioact Mater. 2020;5(4):880-890.
               Target Ther. 2023;8(1):207.                        doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2020.05.004
               doi: 10.1038/s41392-023-01452-1
                                                               20.  Ng WL, Huang X, Shkolnikov V, Suntornnond R, Yeong
            8.   Al Sadoun H. Macrophage phenotypes in normal and   WY. Polyvinylpyrrolidone-based bioink: influence of bioink
               diabetic wound healing and therapeutic interventions. Cells.   properties on printing performance and cell proliferation
               2022;11(15).                                       during  inkjet-based  bioprinting.  Bio-Des  Manuf.
               doi: 10.3390/cells11152430                         2023;6(6):676-690.
            9.   Wynn TA, Vannella KM. Macrophages in tissue repair,      doi: 10.1007/s42242-023-00245-3
               regeneration, and fibrosis. Immunity. 2016;44(3):450-462.   21.  Li X, Liu B, Pei B, et al. Inkjet bioprinting of biomaterials.
               doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2016.02.015                  Chem Rev. 2020;120(19):10793-10833.
            10.  Balabiyev A, Podolnikova NP, Kilbourne JA, et al. Fibrin      doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00008
               polymer on the surface of biomaterial implants drives the   22.  Chartrain NA, Williams CB, Whittington AR. A review on
               foreign body reaction. Biomaterials. 2021;277.     fabricating tissue scaffolds using vat photopolymerization.
               doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2021.121087            Acta Biomater. 2018;2018(74):90-111.
            11.  Anderson JM, Rodriguez A, Chang DT. Foreign body      doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2018.05.010
               reaction to  biomaterials.  Semin Immunol.  2008;20(2):   23.  Ramesh S, Harrysson OLA, Rao PK, et al. Extrusion
               86-100.                                            bioprinting: recent progress, challenges, and future
               doi: 10.1016/j.smim.2007.11.004                    opportunities. Bioprinting. 2021;21.
            12.  Lee SC, Gillispie G, Prim P, Lee SJ. Physical and chemical      doi: 10.1016/j.bprint.2020.e00116
               factors influencing the printability of hydrogel-based   24.  Vijayavenkataraman S, Yan WC, Lu WF, Wang CH, Fuh
               extrusion bioinks. Chem Rev. 2020;120(19):10834-10886.   JYH. 3D bioprinting of tissues and organs for regenerative
               doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00015
                                                                  medicine. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2018;132:296-332.
            13.  Bu W, Wu Y, Ghaemmaghami AM, Sun H, Mata A. Rational      doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2018.07.004
               design of hydrogels for immunomodulation. Regen Biomater.   25.  Labowska MB, Cierluk K, Jankowska AM, Kulbacka J,
               2022;9:rbac009.                                    Detyna J, Michalak I. A review on the adaption of alginate-
               doi: 10.1093/rb/rbac009
                                                                  gelatin hydrogels for 3D cultures and bioprinting. Materials.
            14.  Camarero‐Espinosa S, Carlos‐Oliveira M, Liu H, Mano JF,   2021;14(4).
               Bouvy N, Moroni L. 3D printed dual‐porosity scaffolds: the      doi: 10.3390/ma14040858


            Volume 10 Issue 4 (2024)                       352                                doi: 10.36922/ijb.2874
   355   356   357   358   359   360   361   362   363   364   365