Page 397 - IJB-10-4
P. 397

International Journal of Bioprinting                       Design of biofixed metamaterial bone plates and fillers




            1–2 times the width (H = W or 2W ) or diameter (H = D    In this study, the femoral prosthesis after osteotomy
                                        0
                                                          0
                                                      0
                              0
                                  0
            or 2D ). The dimensions of the modeled porous structure   was printed using the Z-603S industrial high-precision
                0
            were: length: 10 mm; width: 10 mm; height: 12 mm; unit   desktop 3D printer (Aurora Volvo Co., Ltd., China). The
            size: 3 mm; and thickness: 0.25 mm. Table 1 displays the   molding material was polylactic acid (PLA); the printing
            parameters of the designed porous structures.      layer thickness was 0.15 mm; the filling density was 20%.
                                                               The material for the bone plate and filler mold was 316L
            2.2. Bone plate production                         stainless steel powder (Sandvik Osprey Limited, United
            The femoral prosthesis after osteotomy can be printed   Kingdom). The elemental composition of the 316L stainless
            using a plastic 3D printer, and the bone plate and filler   steel powder was compliant with the ASTM A276 standard
            can be printed using a metal 3D printer. This approach   (Table 2). The particle size distribution of 316L stainless
            retains the biocompatibility and reduces the overall costs.   steel powder was narrow and concentrated, i.e., 90% of
            Table 1. Design parameters and shapes of the porous structures
             Type of porous   Porosity (%)  Average pore    Surface area-to-volume ratio     Shape
             structure                     diameter (mm)





             Diamond             80.54          1.09               2.63












             Gyroid              83.71          0.89               2.14











             Lidinoid            54.04          0.55               2.75












             Split P             78.69          0.81               3.45









            Volume 10 Issue 4 (2024)                       389                                doi: 10.36922/ijb.2388
   392   393   394   395   396   397   398   399   400   401   402