Page 440 - IJB-10-4
P. 440

International Journal of Bioprinting                                 Improving ductility of 3D-printed Zn–Mg

















































            Figure 4. Printability of laser powder bed fusion (LPBF)-fabricated Zn–Mg alloy with 3 wt% Mg: (a) width of single tracks, (b) optical microscopy image
            of single tracks, (c) relative density variation, and (d) optimized process parameter window. Abbreviation: Ev, volume energy density.



            the LPBF-fabricated Zn–Mg alloy exhibited the highest   indicative of ZnO were observed, signifying the absence
            relative density at 98.62%. All the fabricated Zn–Mg alloys   of oxidation in the vacuum environment during the LPBF
            achieved optimal densification at the laser power of 80 W   process. From the phase diagram for Zn–Mg alloys, the
            and scanning speed at 600–800 mm/s.                precipitation of Mg Zn  and MgZn  phases occurred at
                                                                               2
                                                                                  11
                                                                                            2
                                                               approximately 364°C.
            3.2. Microstructure of fabricated Zn–Mg alloys
            The XRD results of the LPBF-fabricated Zn–Mg alloys   The morphology and corresponding element
            with different Mg concentrations are depicted in  Figure   distributions of LPBF-fabricated Zn–Mg alloys are
            5. Initially, the diffraction peaks that corresponded to the   presented in  Figure 6. In  Figure 6a,  d,  and  g, the grain
            hexagonal close-packed crystal structure of  α-Zn were   size  of  Zn–Mg  alloys  decreased  with  increasing  Mg
            observed in the fabricated Zn–Mg alloys at all compositions.   concentration. The grain sizes were approximately 1–2,
            Subsequently,  no  distinct  diffraction  peaks  of  Mg Zn    0.5–1, and 0.5 μm for Zn–1Mg, Zn–3Mg, and Zn–5Mg,
                                                         11
                                                      2
            were obtained in the Zn–1Mg alloy with a predominant   respectively. The addition of Mg primarily contributed to
            α-Zn phase due to its lower Mg concentration. In contrast,   grain refinement in Zn–1Mg, while eutectic structures
            both Mg Zn  and MgZn  phases were identified in    became more pronounced in Zn–3Mg (indicated by dark
                    2
                                  2
                      11
            the  Zn–3Mg  and  Zn–5Mg  alloys,  and  their  intensities   regions). Additionally, irregular polyhedral second-phase
            increased significantly with increasing Mg concentration.   structures were significantly present in Zn–5Mg. Elemental
            Notably, higher intensity peaks of Mg Zn  and MgZn    composition analysis using EDS illustrated the presence of
                                                          2
                                               11
                                            2
            were achieved in the Zn–5Mg alloy. Additionally, no peaks   α-Zn matrix and a second phase in LPBF-fabricated Zn–
            Volume 10 Issue 4 (2024)                       432                                doi: 10.36922/ijb.3034
   435   436   437   438   439   440   441   442   443   444   445