Page 445 - IJB-10-4
P. 445

International Journal of Bioprinting                                 Improving ductility of 3D-printed Zn–Mg




            a significant decrease observed in the Mg concentration   densities were calculated to be 9.618 ± 0.345 and 14.091
            was observed within the  α-Zn matrix compared to that   ± 0.903 μA/cm  for the as-built and annealed Zn–1Mg
                                                                            2
            of the as-built alloy. Meanwhile, more accumulation   samples,  respectively.  The  degradation  rate  (R )  can  be
                                                                                                     d
            occurred along the grain boundaries, which aligned with   calculated as follows:
            the observations at 250°C annealing temperature. Figure
            9f illustrates numerous pores present within the Zn–                         I
            Mg alloy annealed at 365°C, of which could be a major           R = 32710.  ×  −3  corr  me    (5)
                                                                             d
            factor contributing to the substantial decline of the alloy’s                 ρ
            mechanical properties.                                where ρ and m  are the density (g/cm ) of Zn–1Mg alloy
                                                                                               3
                                                                             e
               To investigate the effect of annealing on the   and its equivalent metal mass, respectively. For Zn-1Mg, ρ
            electrochemical properties of the LPBF-fabricated Zn–Mg   was determined to be 6.9521 g/cm , and m  was calculated as
                                                                                         3
                                                                                               e
            alloy, the electrochemical properties of Zn–1Mg alloy were   32.4847. The degradation rate of the as-built and annealed
            evaluated and the polarization curves were presented in   Zn–1Mg alloy was evaluated to be 0.147 and 0.215 mm/
            Figure 10. The corrosion potentials (E ) for both as-built   year, respectively, indicating that annealing accelerated the
                                          corr
            and annealed Zn–1Mg alloy samples were determined to   degradation of LPBF-fabricated Zn–Mg alloy.
            be −1.115 ± 0.008 and −1.116 ± 0.003 V, respectively. The
            corrosion current densities (I ) of the as-built Zn–1Mg   After annealing, the grain size of Zn–Mg alloy
                                    corr
            alloy were calculated using the extrapolation method.   increased, leading to a decrease in the grain boundary
            Notably, an inflection point was observed in the anodic   density and an increase in the corrosion current, thereby
            part of the polarization curve for the annealed sample   accelerating the degradation rate. Simultaneously, the finer
            (as indicated by a black arrow), indicating the occurrence   grain size facilitated the formation of a continuous oxide
            of  passivation and  resulting  in  a sudden  increase  in   layer on the surface of Zn–Mg alloy, effectively inhibiting
            the current density at this point. Hence, the cathodic   further inward degradation reactions. However, annealing
            polarization region was used to calculate the  I  of the   also promoted Mg enrichment at grain boundaries and
                                                   corr
            annealed sample. Consequently, the corrosion current   increased the Mg Zn  and MgZn  phases. These phases
                                                                             2  11         2



































            Figure 9. Annealing effect on laser powder bed fusion (LPBF)-fabricated Zn–Mg alloy: (a) X-ray diffraction (XRD) pattern of the annealed Zn–Mg alloy;
            morphology of the LPBF-fabricated Zn–Mg alloy at different annealing temperatures: (b) 250°C, (d) 300°C, and (f) 365°C; element distribution of the LPBF-
            fabricated Zn–Mg alloy: (c) Mg distribution at 250°C annealing temperature, and (e) Zn and Mg concentrations at the point in 300°C annealing temperature.


            Volume 10 Issue 4 (2024)                       437                                doi: 10.36922/ijb.3034
   440   441   442   443   444   445   446   447   448   449   450