Page 465 - IJB-10-4

International Journal of Bioprinting Biomechanical mimic-based artificial oviduct system

11. Gruber I, Klein M. Embryo culture media for human 24. Ying G, Manriquez J, Wu D, et al. An open-source handheld
IVF: which possibilities exist? J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc. extruder loaded with pore-forming bioink for in situ wound
2011;12:110-117. dressing. Mater Today Bio. 2020;8:100074.
doi: 10.5152/jtgga.2011.25 doi: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2020.100074
12. Jafarbeglou F, Nazari MA, Keikhab F, Amanpour S, Azadi 25. Wu T, Gao YY, Su J, et al. Three-dimensional bioprinting
M. Visco-hyperelastic characterization of the mechanical of artificial ovaries by an extrusion-based method using
properties of human fallopian tube tissue using atomic force gelatin-methacryloyl bioink. Climacteric. 2022;25:170-178.
microscopy. Materialia. 2021;16:101074. doi: 10.1080/13697137.2021.1921726
doi: 10.1016/j.mtla.2021.101074
26. Amorim CA, Shikanov A. The artificial ovary: current status
13. Di X, Gao X, Peng L, et al. Cellular mechanotransduction and future perspectives. Future Oncol. 2016;12:2323-2332.
in health and diseases: from molecular mechanism to doi: 10.2217/fon-2016-0202
therapeutic targets. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2023;8:282. 27. Celikkin N, Mastrogiacomo S, Jaroszewicz J, Walboomers
doi: 10.1038/s41392-023-01501-9
XF, Swieszkowski W. Gelatin methacrylate scaffold for bone
14. Luo C, Ding Z, Tu Y, Tan J, Luo Q, Song G. Biomaterial- tissue engineering: the influence of polymer concentration.
based platforms for cancer stem cell enrichment and study. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2018;106:201-209.
Cancer Biol Med. 2021;18:458-469. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.36226.
doi: 10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2020.0420
28. Fathi E, Farahzadi R, Valipour B. Alginate/gelatin
15. d’Angelo M, Benedetti E, Tupone MG, et al. The role of stiffness encapsulation promotes NK cells differentiation potential of
in cell reprogramming: a potential role for biomaterials in bone marrow resident C-kit(+) hematopoietic stem cells. Int
inducing tissue regeneration. Cells. 2019;8(9):1036. J Biol Macromol. 2021;177:317-327.
doi: 10.3390/cells8091036. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2021.02.131
16. Janmey PA, Fletcher DA, Reinhart-King CA. Stiffness 29. McBeth C, Lauer J, Ottersbach M, Campbell J, Sharon
sensing by cells. Physiol Rev. 2020;100:695-724. A, Sauer-Budge AF. 3D bioprinting of GelMA scaffolds
doi: 10.1152/physrev.00013.2019. triggers mineral deposition by primary human osteoblasts.
Biofabrication. 2017;9:015009.
17. Miller CJ, Davidson LA. The interplay between cell signalling
and mechanics in developmental processes. Nat Rev Genet. doi: 10.1088/1758-5090/aa53bd
2013;14:733-744. 30. Krishnamoorthy S, Noorani B, Xu C. Effects of encapsulated
doi: 10.1038/nrg3513 cells on the physical-mechanical properties and
microstructure of gelatin methacrylate Hydrogels. Int J Mol
18. Shah JS, Sabouni R, Cayton Vaught KC, Owen CM, Albertini
DF, Segars JH. Biomechanics and mechanical signaling Sci. 2019;20(20):5061.
in the ovary: a systematic review. J Assist Reprod Genet. doi: 10.3390/ijms20205061
2018;35:1135-1148. 31. Martin JA, Wang Z. Next-generation transcriptome
doi: 10.1007/s10815-018-1180-y assembly. Nat Rev Genet. 2011;12(10):671-682.
doi: 10.1038/nrg3068
19. Vijayavenkataraman S, Yan WC, Lu WF, Wang CH, Fuh
JYH. 3D bioprinting of tissues and organs for regenerative 32. Jiang H, Lei R, Ding SW, Zhu S. Skewer: a fast and accurate
medicine. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2018;132:296-332. adapter trimmer for next-generation sequencing paired-end
doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2018.07.004 reads. BMC Bioinformatics. 2014;15:182.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-15-182
20. Mandrycky C, Wang Z, Kim K, Kim DH. 3D bioprinting for
engineering complex tissues. Biotechnol Adv. 2016;34:422-434. 33. Dobin A, Davis CA, Schlesinger F, et al. STAR: ultrafast
doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2015.12.011 universal RNA-seq aligner. Bioinformatics. 2013;29:15-21.
doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts635
21. Chung JHY, Naficy S, Yue Z, et al. Bio-ink properties and
printability for extrusion printing living cells. Biomater Sci. 34. Trapnell C, Williams BA, Pertea G, et al. Transcript assembly
2013;1:763-773. and quantification by RNA-Seq reveals unannotated
doi: 10.1039/c3bm00012e transcripts and isoform switching during cell differentiation.
Nat Biotechnol. 2010;28:511-515.
22. Schwab A, Levato R, D’Este M, Piluso S, Eglin D, Malda J.
Printability and shape fidelity of bioinks in 3D bioprinting. doi: 10.1038/nbt.1621
Chem Rev. 2020;120:11028-11055. 35. Wu T, Hu E, Xu S, et al. clusterProfiler 4.0: a universal
doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00084 enrichment tool for interpreting omics data. Innovation
(Camb). 2021;2:100141.
23. Lee JM, Yeong WY. Design and printing strategies in 3d
bioprinting of cell-hydrogels: a review. Adv Healthc Mater. doi: 10.1016/j.xinn.2021.100141
2016;5:2856-2865. 36. Liu P, Shen H, Zhi Y, et al. 3D bioprinting and in vitro study
doi: 10.1002/adhm.201600435 of bilayered membranous construct with human cells-

Volume 10 Issue 4 (2024) 457 doi: 10.36922/ijb.3346