Page 523 - IJB-10-4
P. 523

International Journal of Bioprinting                                   3D-printed variable stiffness scaffolds




            45.  Zhang Q, Lu H, Kawazoe N, Chen G. Pore size effect of   55.  Frean SP, Abraham LA, Lees P, In vitro stimulation of equine
               collagen scaffolds on cartilage regeneration. Acta Biomater.   articular cartilage proteoglycan synthesis by hyaluronan and
               2014;10(5):2005-2013.                              carprofen. Res Vet Sci. 1999;67(2):183-190.
               doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2013.12.042                  doi: 10.1053/rvsc.1999.0328
            46.  O’Brien FJ, Harley BA, Yannas VI, Gibson LJ. The effect   56.  Bian L, Hou C, Tous E, Rai R, Mauck RL, Burdick JA.
               of pore size on cell adhesion in collagen-GAG scaffolds.   The influence of hyaluronic acid hydrogel crosslinking
               Biomaterials. 2005;26(4):433-441.                  density and macromolecular diffusivity on human
               doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.02.052            MSC  chondrogenesis  and hypertrophy.  Biomaterials.
                                                                  2013;34(2):413-421.
            47.  Silva MMCG, Cyster LA, Barry JJA, et al. The effect of
               anisotropic architecture on cell and tissue infiltration into tissue      doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.09.052
               engineering scaffolds. Biomaterials. 2006;27(35):5909-5917.  57.  Re’em T, Kaminer-Israeli Y, Ruvinov E, Cohen S.
               doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.08.010            Chondrogenesis of hMSC in affinity-bound TGF-beta
                                                                  scaffolds. Biomaterials. 2012;33:751.
            48.  Lien SM, Ko LY, Huang TJ, Effect of pore size on ECM secretion
               and cell growth in gelatin scaffold for articular cartilage tissue      doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.10.007
               engineering. Acta Biomater. 2009;5(2):670-679.  58.  Roberts JJ, Nicodemus GD, Giunta S, Bryant  SJ.
               doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2008.09.020                  Incorporation of biomimetic matrix molecules in PEG
                                                                  hydrogels enhances matrix deposition and reduces load-
            49.  Haugh MG, Murphy CM, O’Brien FJ. Novel freeze-drying
               methods to produce a range of collagen–glycosaminoglycan   induced  loss  of  chondrocyte-secreted  matrix.  J Biomed
               scaffolds with tailored mean pore sizes. Tissue Eng Part C   Mater Res A. 2011;97 A(3):281-291.
               Methods. 2010;16(5):887-894.                       doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.33057
               doi: 10.1089/ten.TEC.2009.0422                  59.  Levett PA, Hutmacher DW, Malda J, Klein TJ. Hyaluronic
                                                                  acid enhances the mechanical properties of tissue-engineered
            50.  Stenhamre H, Nannmark U, Lindahl A, Gatenholm P,
               Brittberg M. Influence of pore size on the redifferentiation   cartilage constructs. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(12):e113216.
               potential of human articular chondrocytes in poly (urethane      doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0113216
               urea) scaffolds. J Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2011;5(7):578-588.  60.  Eyre DR, Koob TJ, Chun LE. Biochemistry of the meniscus:
               doi: 10.1002/term.350                              unique profile of collagen types and site-dependent
                                                                  variations in composition. Orthop Transact. 1983;8:56.
            51.  Nava MM, Draghi L, Giordano C, Pietrabissa R. The effect
               of scaffold pore size in cartilage tissue engineering. J Appl   61.  Wu JJ, Eyre DR, Slayter HS. Type VI collagen of the
               Biomater Funct Mater. 2016;14(3):e223-e229.        intervertebral disc. Biochemical and electron-microscopic
               doi: 10.5301/jabfm.5000302                         characterization of the native protein.  Biochem J.
                                                                  1987;248(2):373-381.
            52.  Sheehy EJ, Buckley CT, Kelly DJ. Oxygen tension regulates
               the osteogenic, chondrogenic and endochondral phenotype      doi: 10.1042/bj248037
               of bone marrow derived mesenchymal stem cells. Biochem   62.  Makris EA, Hadidi P, Athanasiou KA. The knee meniscus:
               Biophys Res Commun. 2012;417(1):305-310.           structure-function,  pathophysiology,  current  repair
               doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2011.11.105                    techniques, and prospects for regeneration.  Biomaterials.
                                                                  2011;32(30):7411-7431.
            53.  Baker BM, Nathan AS,Huffman GR, Mauck RL.  Tissue
               engineering with meniscus cells derived from surgical debris.      doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.06.037
               Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2009;17(3):336-345.   63.  Erickson IE, Kestle SR, Zellars KH, et al. High mesenchymal
               doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2008.08.001                    stem cell seeding densities in hyaluronic acid hydrogels
                                                                  produce engineered cartilage with native tissue properties.
            54.  Yoshikawa K, Kitamura N, Kurokawa T, Gong JP, Nohara
               Y, Yasuda K. Hyaluronic acid affects the in vitro induction   Acta Biomater. 2012;8(8):3027-3034.
               effects of synthetic PAMPS and PDMAAm hydrogels on      doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2012.04.033
               chondrogenic differentiation of ATDC5 cells, depending   64.  Klein TJ, Rizzi SC, Schrobback K, et al. Long-term effects of
               on the level of concentration.  BMC Musculoskelet Disord.   hydrogel properties on human chondrocyte behavior. Soft
               2013;14:56.                                        Matter. 2010;6(20):5175-5183.
               doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-14-56                       doi: 10.1039/C0SM00229A












            Volume 10 Issue 4 (2024)                       515                                doi: 10.36922/ijb.3784
   518   519   520   521   522   523   524   525   526   527   528