Page 65 - IJB-5-2
P. 65

PERSPECTIVE ARTICLE

           Three-dimensional-printing for microfluidics or the

           other way around?


           Yi Zhang*

           Singapore 3D-Printing Center, HP-NTU Digital Manufacturing Corporate Lab, School of Mechanical and Aerospace
           Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore


           Abstract: As  microfluidic  devices  are  designed  to  tackle  more  intricate  tasks,  the  architecture  of  microfluidic  devices
           becomes more complex, and more sophisticated fabrication techniques are in demand. Therefore, it is sensible to fabricate
           microfluidic devices by three-dimensional (3D)-printing, which is well-recognized for its unique ability to monolithically
           fabricate complex structures using a near-net-shape additive manufacturing process. Many 3D-printed microfluidic platforms
           have been demonstrated but can 3D-printed microfluidics meet the demanding requirements in today’s context, and has
           microfluidics truly benefited from 3D-printing? In contrast to 3D-printed microfluidics, some go the other way around and
           exploit  microfluidics  for  3D-printing.  Many  innovative  printing  strategies  have  been  made  possible  with  microfluidics-
           enabled 3D-printing, although the limitations are also largely evident. In this perspective article, we take a look at the current
           development in 3D-printed microfluidics and microfluidics-enabled 3D printing with a strong focus on the limitations of the
           two technologies. More importantly, we attempt to identify the innovations required to overcome these limitations and to
           develop new high-value applications that would make a scientific and social impact in the future.

           Keywords: 3D-printing; Bioprinting; Microfluidics

           *Correspondence to: Yi Zhang, Singapore 3D-Printing Center, HP-NTU Digital Manufacturing Corporate Lab, School of Mechanical and
           Aerospace Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore; yi_zhang@ntu.edu.sg

           Received: March 15, 2019; Accepted: May 30, 2019; Published Online: July 3, 2019
           Citation:  Zhang  Y,  2019,  3D-Printing  for  microfluidics  or  the  other  way  around?  Int  J  Bioprint,  5(2):  192.
           http://dx.doi.org/10.18063/ijb.v5i2.192

           1. Introduction                                     used  in  microelectronic  and  mechanical  systems
                                                               (MEMS).  Various  microfluidic  components  are  created
           Microfluidics  is  already  a  mature  technology  that  is   by  etching  microstructures  into  silicon.  The  well-
           widely  adopted  in  the  bioanalytical  investigation,   established MEMS technology is readily applied to the
           clinical diagnostics, and chemical sensing and synthesis.
           Microfluidic technology has many compelling advantages   fabrication  of  microfluidic  chips,  giving  microfluidics
           over  its  bulk  flow  counterpart,  such  as  low  reagent   a  Kickstart.  Innovations  in  silicon-based  microfluidic
           and  sample  consumption,  favorable  thermodynamics   networks, actuators, pumps, mixers, and valves emerge
           and  chemical  reaction  kinetics,  laminar  flow  profile,   at  a  rapid  rate,  giving  rise  to  many  novels  and  unique
           precise handling of single bioparticles, and high degree   microfluidic  applications  such  as  cell  sorting  and
           of  parallelization  and  multiplexing [1-4] .  Many  advanced   trapping,  biochemical  sensing,  genetic  analysis,  and
           analytical  systems,  such  as  next-generation  sequencers   drug  delivery [5-9] .  In  spite  of  their  great  potential  to
           and molecular diagnostic platforms, incorporate certain   revolutionize  biomedical  research,  these  silicon-based
           microfluidic components these days.                 microfluidic devices experience difficulty when trying to
             Conventional  fabrication  of  microfluidic  devices   find their way into biological laboratories, and one of the
           heavily  relies  on  micromachining  techniques.  The   main obstacles is the complicated fabrication workflow.
           earlier fabrication methods are derived from techniques   Although  engineers  may  think  that  the  fabrication  of

           Three-dimensional-printing for microfluidics or the other way around? © 2019 Zhang. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the
           Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), permitting all non-commercial
           use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
                                                                                                            61
   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70