Page 166 - IJB-10-5
P. 166

International Journal of Bioprinting                               Nozzle optimization for multi-ink bioprinting






















































            Figure 2. Consistency test of numerical simulation against experiment by testing the switching behavior in different shape of nozzle. (A, B) Single nozzle
            shapes prepared for simulation (A) and experiment (B); scale bar = 1 mm. (C) Effects of single nozzle’s conjunction angle on switching efficiency (Se) at
            1.0 wt% SA solution in the experiment (black bars) and simulation (white bars). Experimental data were obtained five times for each sample. Data are
            expressed as mean ± S.D.; * p < 0.05.


            the  simulation results, demonstrating  that the  effects   switch between different viscous bioinks is necessary for
            of viscosity on switching could be effectively analyzed   achieving high-resolution multi-ink printing.
            through numerical simulations.
                                                               3.3. Effect of asymmetrical nozzle shape on
               Furthermore, the effect of viscosity was also analyzed   switching efficiency
            in nozzles with different conjunction angles (Figure 2A)   We previously demonstrated  that the shape  of the
            using numerical simulations (Figure 3D). The nozzle with   conjunction area in a single nozzle  influences  Se.
            a 15° conjunction angle exhibited the highest Se for any   Considering this impact, we hypothesized that flow
            ink combination, while the nozzle with a 75° conjunction   direction is a critical factor for efficiently switching
            angle had the lowest efficiency for any combination. These   between different viscous inks. To test this hypothesis, the
            results demonstrated that viscosity significantly affects   impact of ink flow direction on Se was investigated using
            switching efficiency in any nozzle configuration used in this   five  types  of  asymmetrical  nozzles  (Figure  4A;  labeled
            study. Therefore, developing a nozzle that can efficiently   I–V). In numerical simulations, 1.0 wt% SA solution was


            Volume 10 Issue 5 (2024)                       158                                doi: 10.36922/ijb.4091
   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171