Page 171 - IJB-10-5
P. 171

International Journal of Bioprinting                               Nozzle optimization for multi-ink bioprinting



















































            Figure 6. Nozzle proposal for switching 2 and 0.5 wt% SA inks with high efficiency. (A) Schematics of the T-junction nozzle, asymmetrical nozzle, and
            cross nozzle prepared for simulation and experiment. (B) Switching efficiency (Se) of the T-junction, asymmetrical, and cross nozzles. “N” indicates that
            switching did not occur within 20 s. (C) Cross nozzle fabricated using a vat polymerization-based printer; scale bar = 1 mm. (D) Comparison of the
            transition length between cross and T-junction nozzles based on printing experiments. Experimental data were obtained five times for each sample. Data
            are expressed as mean ± S.D.; * p < 0.05.

            anticipated that the ink switching would occur more   with various nozzle shapes and ink combinations through
            rapidly in a nozzle with modified corners. Consequently,   numerical simulation,  enhancing  our  understanding
            the corners of the T-junction nozzle were trimmed, as   and capabilities in nozzle design for bioprinting. Future
            shown in Figure 7B. This modification facilitated smoother   modifications could include incorporating additional
            ink switching compared with the standard T-junction   parameters such as diffusion coefficients and other fluid
            nozzle. Furthermore, the transition length in the corner-  models into the simulations to further refine nozzle designs
            shaved nozzle was measured and illustrated in  Figure   for multi-ink printing.
            7C. In this configuration, the SA ink transitioned more
            smoothly than that in a conventional T-junction nozzle,   4. Limitations and future perspective
            as depicted in  Figure 7D. The widths of the transition   We explored proposals for constructing 3D structures
            area of printed line structures were 1.7–2.2 mm, which   with a higher resolution. Our findings demonstrate that
            showed no significant difference, as shown in  Figure   utilizing both numerical and experimental approaches
            S6A, Supporting Information. Figure S6B, Supporting   is effective for designing a single nozzle for multi-ink
            Information,  shows the transition areas of printed line   printing. However, transition lengths exceeding 5 mm
            structures. This  methodology allowed us  to experiment   are inadequate for achieving the micro-scale structures


            Volume 10 Issue 5 (2024)                       163                                doi: 10.36922/ijb.4091
   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176