Page 286 - IJB-10-5
P. 286

International Journal of Bioprinting                                     3D printing of collagen II-scaffolds




            in a 4°C-water bath. Thereafter, 0.02% (w/v) genipin was   2.3. Morphological study
            added to the solution. The water bath was removed and the
            solution was stirred with a magnetic bar for 1 h.   2.3.1. Scanning electron microscopy
                                                               To prepare for scanning electron microscopy (SEM),
            2.2.3. 3D printing                                 scaffolds of samples a–f were immersed in liquid nitrogen
            3D printing was performed using an extrusion-based   for 30 s and fractured. The samples were gently touched
            3D printer (Regenovo, China). A 3D cryogenic well was   with filter paper to remove excess surface water, placed
            connected to both the printer and a chiller, which provides   into a sputter coater, and vacuumed immediately for
            water circulation to induce a cooling effect. The room   20 min. The samples were loaded into the vacuum
            temperature was fixed at 25°C. Tapered plastic needles   chamber of the SEM instrument (Zeiss, Germany) and
            (27G; inner diameter: 200 μm; outer diameter: 400 μm)   vacuumed again. SEM observation was performed under
            were used for printing. The scaffold was printed layer-by-  the secondary electron (SE) mode, and the accelerating
            layer for a total of seven layers in a mesh pattern where rods   voltage was set to 3 kV. ImageJ was used to analyze the
            in adjacent layers were perpendicular to each other. The   average rod diameter and pore size in the SEM images.
            degree of orientation of the first, third, fifth, and seventh
            layers was set to 90°, while that of the second, fourth, and   2.3.2. Transmission electron microscopy
            sixth layers was set to 0°. To prevent ink overflow and   To prepare for transmission electron microscopy (TEM),
            deficiency when printing the starting and ending points of   the as-purchased CNF solution (2 wt%) was diluted by
            each rod, respectively, the rod was printed in a continuous   100×. A TEM instrument (Talos L120C G2; Thermal
            zig-zag pattern for every layer. The printing head kept   Scientific, United States of America [USA]) with an
            extruding ink materials when printing each single layer.   accelerating voltage of 120 kV was used to study the
            The height of each layer was set to 0.14 mm. An extrusion   nanoscale morphology of CNF.
            pressure  of 0.08 MPa was used  for printing the CNF/  2.4. Rheological study
            collagen I/alginate hydrogel ink, while 0.22 MPa was used   All rheological studies were conducted on the collagen II
            for printing all the other hydrogel inks. The temperature of   and gelatin-containing hydrogel inks using an MCR302e
            the cryogenic well was set to −1°C for printing all samples.   rheometer (Anton Paar, Austria). A movable and
            The distance between the centerline of the adjacent rod,   isothermal sample cover and a 25-mm parallel plate were
            denoted as rod distance, was set to 450 μm when printing   used for all rheological tests. Before the sample was loaded
            the CNF/gelatin/alginate scaffold (sample a) and CNF/  or removed, the temperature of the chamber was fixed at
            collagen I/alginate scaffold (sample b). The rod distance   25°C for 10 min before adjusting to other temperatures.
            was set to 320, 450, and 550 μm when printing the CNF/
            collagen II/alginate scaffold (samples d–f, respectively).   2.4.1. Oscillation temperature ramp test
            The printing speed was set to 7 mm/s when printing   Temperature ramp test was conducted at a range of −3 to
            samples a, b, e, and f; the printing speed was set to 10 mm/s   37°C. The strain was held constant at 1%, and the oscillation
            when printing sample d.                            frequency was set to 1 rad/s.
            2.2.4. Post-treatment procedure                    2.4.2. Steady-shear flow test
            The crosslinking solution was stored in the refrigerator   Steady-shear flow tests were conducted at a shear rate range
            at 4°C before use.  After printing, the cryogenic well   of 0.1–100 s , and the test temperature was set to −1°C.
                                                                        −1
            was kept at −8°C for 20 min. The crosslinking solution
            was added to the frozen scaffold dropwise until it was   2.4.3. Creep test
            immersed. The cryogenic well was then kept at 7°C   A creep test was conducted under constant stress of
            for  20  min,  and  the  thawed  scaffolds  were  peeled  off,    100 Pa for the first 300 s. Thereafter, the shear stress was
            collected, and  immediately  stored in the  refrigerator    immediately reduced to 0 Pa, and the test was conducted
            at −20°C.                                          for an additional 500 s.

            2.2.5. Preparation of the non-porous bulk scaffolds  2.4.4. Oscillation frequency sweep test
            The same CNF/collagen II/alginate hydrogel ink used for   A frequency sweep test was conducted at −1°C and at a
            3D printing was heated to 37°C and  held isothermally   frequency range of 0.1–100 rad/s.
            for 1 h. The ink was then injected into a six-well culture   2.5. Cell culture and characterizations
            plate with a 20-mL syringe. The as-prepared crosslinking
            solution was added to the ink for 20 min, and the solution   2.5.1. Cell extraction and seeding
            (sample c) was stored immediately thereafter in the   Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) were isolated from the
            refrigerator at −20°C.                             bone marrow aspirate, i.e., from the tibia and femur

            Volume 10 Issue 5 (2024)                       278                                doi: 10.36922/ijb.3371
   281   282   283   284   285   286   287   288   289   290   291