Page 287 - IJB-10-5
P. 287

International Journal of Bioprinting                                     3D printing of collagen II-scaffolds




            marrow, of SD mice. Before cell seeding, all scaffolds were   (i)   RNA  extraction: Cells were digested using a
            immersed in 75 wt% ethanol for 10 min, washed once      TRK  Lysis  Buffer  (Omega  Bio-tek,  USA),  and
            with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS; Beyotime, China),   impurities were removed by centrifugation in an
            exposed to ultraviolet (UV) radiation for 30 min, and   RNA homogenizer spin column (Omega Bio-tek,
            immersed in Minimum Essential Medium α (α-MEM;          USA). The filtrate was collected and transferred to a
            Vivacell, China), supplemented with 10 wt% fetal        HiBind RNA mini-column (XXX, YYY). Nuclease-
            bovine serum (Gibco,  Australia),  10 kU/mL penicillin   free water was then used to collect RNAs attached
            (Beyotime, China), and 10 mg/mL streptomycin            to the column. The total RNA concentration was
            (Beyotime, China) (henceforth denoted as complete       measured using a NanoDrop spectrophotometer
            medium) for 24 h. MSCs passage 2 (P2) were seeded onto   (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) and the 260/280 nm
            scaffolds at a density of 10  cells/mL for CCK-8 testing   absorbance ratio was recorded.
                                  5
            and 10  cells/mL for all other tests. Cell culture was   (ii)  Reverse  transcription:  Following  the  kit’s
                  6
            conducted in an incubator (Thermo Fisher Scientific,    instructions, gDNA Purge and 2× NovoScript  Plus
                                                                                                        ®
            USA) at 37°C and 5% CO . After 24 h with observable     1  Strand cDNA Synthesis SuperMix were added
                                                                     st
                                  2
            cell attachment, the complete medium was replaced       to the extracted RNA for reverse transcription into
            by  a  chondrogenic  differentiation  medium  to  induce   cDNA. The mixture was incubated at 50°C for 15 min
            the  chondrogenic  differentiation.  The  chondrogenic   and subsequently at 75°C for 5 min. The resultant
            differentiation medium is composed of the as-prepared   cDNA was then directly used for qPCR.
            α-MEM culture medium, supplemented with 10 μg/mL
            transforming growth factor-β3 (Abbkine, China), 10   (iii)  qPCR: According to the manufacturer’s instructions,
                                                                              ®
            mM  β-glycerol  phosphate  (Sigma-Aldrich,  USA),  and   2× NovoStart  SYBR qPCR SuperMix Plus, forward
            100 nM dexamethasone (Sigma-Aldrich, USA).              and reverse primers, template, and RNase-free water
                                                                    were sequentially added to the cDNA sample with
            2.5.2. CCK-8 test                                       a final volume of 20 μL. qPCR amplification was
            CCK-8 test was conducted on days 1, 3, and 5 of culture.   performed and the reaction program was set to 95°C
            Before the test, the existing culture medium was replaced   for 1 min for initiation, followed by 35–45 cycles of
            with α-MEM medium, supplemented with 10 wt% CCK-        incubation at 95°C for 20 s and 60°C for 1 min.
            8 cell-counting agent (Beyotime, China), and incubated
            for 1 h. During the test, 100 μL of cell supernatant was   The  results  were  subsequently analyzed  using  the
                                                                           29
            extracted and its optical density (OD) value was measured   ΔΔCt method.  The cycle threshold (Ct) value is the
            at a wavelength of 450 nm using a spectrophotometer   cycle number at which the fluorescence signal exceeds
            (Multiskan GO; Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA). Each   the background noise. The Ct values of the reference and
            sample  type  was  assessed in  triplicates,  and  data  are   target genes of the experimental and control groups were
            presented as mean ± standard deviation. One-way analysis   measured using qPCR. The ΔCt value was then calculated
            of variance (ANOVA) was performed for comparison   for each sample as the difference between the Ct values of
            between sample types using GraphPad Prism 7. Statistical   the experimental and control groups:
            significance is considered for p < 0.05.
                                                                 ΔΔCt = ΔCt (experimental group) − ΔCt (control group)  (I)
            2.5.3. Reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase
            chain reaction
                                           ®
            On day 7 of culture, the E.Z.N.A.  Total RNA Kit      Next, the relative expression of the target gene in the
            (Solarbio, China) was used to extract total RNA from   experimental group compared to the control group was
                                      ®
            bone MSCs (BMSCs). NovoStart  SYBR qPCR SuperMix   determined as follows:
            plus (Novoprotein, China) was used to  measure the
            gene expression levels of collagen I (COL1), collagen      Relative expression = 2 −ΔΔCt       (II)
            II (COL2), hypoxia-inducible factor-1α (HIF1A), SRY-
            box transcription factor 9 (SOX9), runt-related transcription   2.5.4. Cell morphology staining
            factor-2 (RUNX2), Aggrecan core protein (ACAN), focal   Cell  morphology staining  was  performed  using  Actin-
            adhesion kinase (FAK), and N-cadherin (NCAD). Relative   Tracker Red (Beyotime, China)  and 4´,6-diamidino-2-
            gene expression was normalized to the reference gene of   phenylindole (DAPI; Beyotime, China) staining to visualize
            glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH).   the cell cytoskeleton and nucleus, respectively. The stained
               Quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain   cells were fixed with a mounting medium (Biosharp,
            reaction (RT-qPCR) was conducted as follows:       China) and examined under an upright microscope (Leica,


            Volume 10 Issue 5 (2024)                       279                                doi: 10.36922/ijb.3371
   282   283   284   285   286   287   288   289   290   291   292