Page 333 - IJB-10-5
P. 333

International Journal of Bioprinting                                Immunomodulatory bone repair by MBG/PCL

















































            Figure 1. Characterization of MBG. (A, B) SEM and TEM images of MBG, respectively. (C) Isothermal graph of N  adsorption-desorption of MBG. (D)
                                                                                     2
            Pore size distribution graph of MBG.

            30MBG/PCL (9.70 ± 4.07 MPa) scaffolds rapidly collapsed   To assess the difference in performance of scaffolds in
            after reaching the peak compressive strength. As shown in   promoting ALP secretion from BMSCs in the presence
            Figure 3D, the porosity of each group of scaffolds was 76.06   (+OIM) and absence (-OIM) of osteoinductive fluid
            ± 2.58%, 73.96 ± 2.83%, 71.32 ± 4.83%, 76.16 ± 3.25%, and   (OIM), we co-cultured scaffolds containing different MBG
            71.96 ± 2.47% in descending order of MBG content, with   contents with BMSCs in +OIM and -OIM conditions for 7
            no significant difference between groups.          days, and examined their ALP staining and quantification.
                                                               The results, as shown in Figure S1 (Supplementary File),
            3.3. Evaluation of compatibility and osteogenic    OIM significantly upregulated the scaffold-promoted ALP
            properties of the scaffold                         expression, as compared to the -OIM condition, a finding
            As shown in  Figure 4C, the OD values of BMSCs     which we hypothesized to be related to the directional
            proliferating on the scaffolds  in each scaffold group   differentiation of BMSCs. BMSCs have multiple trajectories
            increased with the incubation time. On day 1 of co-  for differentiation, and OIM can induce the directional
            culture, the OD value of the 10MBG/PCL group was   differentiation of BMSCs into osteoblasts.
            significantly higher than that of  the 0MBG/PCL group,
            whereas the difference between the remaining groups was   The expression results of osteogenic differentiation-
            insignificant. However, the proliferative activity of the   related genes (Alp,  Opn,  Runx2,  Bmp2,  Col1) in MBG/
            10MBG/PCL group was significantly better than those of   PCL scaffold-promoted BMSCs are shown in Figure 4E.
            the other groups on days 3 and 7. This result was consistent   In the early stage of osteogenic differentiation, the
            with the live/dead staining fluorescence intensity on day 3   expression of osteogenic genes (Alp, Opn, and Bmp2) in
            (Figure 4A).                                       5MBG/PCL, 10MBG/PCL, and 20MBG/PCL scaffolds was

            Volume 10 Issue 5 (2024)                       325                                doi: 10.36922/ijb.3551
   328   329   330   331   332   333   334   335   336   337   338