Page 337 - IJB-10-5
P. 337

International Journal of Bioprinting                                Immunomodulatory bone repair by MBG/PCL



























































            Figure 5. Differential immunomodulatory properties of MBG/PCL scaffolds. (A) Levels of RAW264.7 cell polarization gene expression promoted by the
            scaffolds. (B1, B2) ALP staining of MBG/PCL scaffolds with BMSCs cultured in an MP-conditioned medium (B1) and the corresponding quantification
            plot (B2). (C) Expression levels of osteogenesis-related genes (Alp,  Opn,  Runx2,  Bmp2,  Col1) in BMSCs cultured in MBG/PCL scaffolds with MP-
            conditioned medium.

            P500, and P800 groups were basically the same, and the   P500, and P800: 70.01 ± 2.12%, 71.32 ± 4.83%, and 80.37 ±
            pore diameters experienced gradual increase with the   1.91%, respectively). Meanwhile, the compressive strength
            gradient of the initial design parameters, which were 241.33   of the scaffold decreases with increasing pore size. P200
            ± 29.79 μm, 535.17 ± 21.57 μm, and 794.80 ± 22.70 μm,   has the best mechanical properties, while P500 decreases
            respectively (Figure 7A). The fibers were crisscrossed with   by about 4.90 MPa, and P800 shows the lowest compressive
            each other, and the surface of the scaffold was brimming   strength, which is 3.13 ± 1.09 MPa (Figure 7D).
            with pores and MBG consistent with the previous scaffold.
            According to Figure 7B and E, P500 has the largest contact   3.6 Effect of fiber thickness on the
            angle, while P200 and P800 have almost similar contact   immunomodulatory osteogenic properties of
            angles  of 86.53 ± 1.86°  and 85.45 ± 0.47°,  respectively.   MBG/PCL scaffolds
            Through Figure 7C, we can see that the larger the pore size   As can be seen from the fluorescence staining results of
            of the scaffolds, the higher the porosity (porosities of P200,   Figure  8A,  BMSCs  were  able  to  colonize  scaffolds  with

            Volume 10 Issue 5 (2024)                       329                                doi: 10.36922/ijb.3551
   332   333   334   335   336   337   338   339   340   341   342