Page 416 - IJB-10-5
P. 416

International Journal of Bioprinting                                     Stability of 3D-printed PEO tablets




            Low-viscosity HPC (M : ~95 k; Kucel  EF) was provided   compressed into a  tablet of 333.3  mg with  a hydraulic
                                          TM
                              w
            by Ashland Inc. (Netherlands). Dibutyl sebacate (DBS)   manual tableting press (Model MTCM-I; Globe Pharma,
            was supplied by Sigma-Aldrich (United States of America   USA), equipped with 10 mm diameter concave punches.
            [USA]). EC (M : ~23 k, Ethocel 10 FP) and PEO (M : 7 M,   The employed pressure was 150 bar, and the dwell time was
                                                     w
                        w
            POLYOX WSR 303; and M : 0.9 M, POLYOX WSR 1105)    constant at 10 s.
                                  w
            were obtained from Colorcon Ltd. (UK) as a gift.
                                                               2.3.2. Hot-melt extrudate tablets
            2.2. Formulation development                       The physical admixture was fed manually at (an average
            Preliminary observation revealed that formulations solely   of) 1 g/min into a 10-mm twin-screw extruder L/D 20
            containing PEO and theophylline were not printable because   (assembled by Point1 Controls/R Controls; Stoke-on-Trent,
            of the high melt viscosity of PEO (M : 0.9 and 7 M). Therefore,   UK) at a screw speed of 50 rpm. The temperature of the
                                       w
            a mixture with other polymers was needed to produce   feed zone was set at 130°, and the temperature for the rest
            printable PEO formulations (Table 1). Since the study focuses   of the zones (including the die) was set at 140°. Although
            on the thermal stability of PEO, thermally stable polymers   this temperature exceeds the melting temperature (T ) of
                                                                                                         m
            (HPC and EC)  were selected to be mixed with PEO.   PEO (73°), it was necessary to exceed the glass transition
                        16
            Theophylline percentage was kept constant (30% [w/w]) in   temperature (T ) of HPC and EC mixed with PEO.
                                                                            g
            all the developed formulations (see compositions in Table 1).    Additionally,  PEO  was processed  at  high  temperatures
            In formulations containing EC (F and F ), a plasticizer   above its T  to investigate (i) the impact of temperature and
                                        3
                                              4
                                                                       m
            (DBS) was also added to improve printability and reduce the   compare the results with other similar studies 12,15,17  and (ii)
            brittleness of EC. DBS was added to EC powder at 13% (w/w)   the effect of thermal process conditions on PEO stability
            of EC weight (equivalent to 5.2% of the total formulation),   and drug release. Filaments were collected manually using
            mixed thoroughly, and left overnight for better sorption of the   a winder. After collecting and cooling, the filaments were
            liquid plasticizer to the EC chains. Thereafter, the plasticized   cut  manually  into  small  pieces  around  2  mm  in  length
            EC was ready to use in making formulations F  and F .  using a pair of scissors. Then, 5 g of the resulting samples
                                                    4
                                               3
               All studied formulations (F –F ) were prepared into   were transferred to a ball mill (PM 100; Retsch GmbH,
                                      1
                                        4
            tablets by three distinct methods: direct compression   Germany) and ground for 4 min at 400 rpm. The ground
            of the physical mixture (PM), compression of HME   powders were collected from the ball mill and kept in tightly
            extrudates, and 3D printing. All tablets were then studied   closed containers at room temperature. The powders were
            for dissolution and other physical characteristics.  compressed into tablets using a hydraulic manual tableting
                                                               press (Model MTCM-I; Globe Pharma, USA) equipped
            2.3. Tablet preparation                            with 10 mm diameter concave punches. Compression was
            Tablets were prepared via three different methods: direct   carried out at 150 bar with a 10-s dwell time. The nominal
            compression of  PM,  compression  of  powders  prepared   weight of each tablet was 333.3 mg, equivalent to 100 mg
            from HME, and 3D printing of HME filaments (via FDM).   of theophylline.
            The manufactured tablets were stored in enclosed vials in
            a chamber at room temperature (22 ± 2°) and tested for   2.3.3. Printed tablets
            dissolution within a week.                         Filaments were prepared using HME, as mentioned earlier.
                                                               The diameter of the filaments is crucial as the filaments
            2.3.1. Physical mixture tablets                    should fit into the feeding nozzle of the FDM printer,
            Using the formulation compositions mentioned in    which has a diameter of 1.75 mm. The diameter of the
            Table 1, the powders were mixed using mortar and   filaments was measured using a vernier caliper, and only
            pestle (approximately for 5 min). The powder blend was   filaments with a  diameter  ranging  between  1.7 and  1.8


            Table 1. Composition of studied formulations.

             Formulation                                       Composition (%)
                                Theophylline     PEO (7 M)      PEO (0.9 M)     HPC         EC        DBS
             F                      30             30              —             40         —          —
             1
             F                      30             —               30            40         —          —
             2
             F   3                  30             30              —             —          40         5.2
             F   4                  30             —               30            —          40         5.2
            Abbreviations: PEO: Polyethylene oxide; HPC: Hydroxypropyl cellulose; EC: Ethyl cellulose; DBS: Dibutyl sebacate.


            Volume 10 Issue 5 (2024)                       408                                doi: 10.36922/ijb.4055
   411   412   413   414   415   416   417   418   419   420   421