Page 451 - IJB-10-5

International Journal of Bioprinting Bioprinting for large-sized tissue delivery

healthy subjects: influence of gender and metabolic 42. Zhu W, Cui H, Boualam B, et al. 3D bioprinting mesenchymal
syndrome. J Hepatol. 2008;48(4):606-613. stem cell-laden construct with core-shell nanospheres
doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2007.11.020 for cartilage tissue engineering. Nanotechnology.
39. Tringides CM, Vachicouras N, de Lazaro I, et al. Viscoelastic 2018;29(18):185101.
surface electrode arrays to interface with viscoelastic tissues. doi: 10.1088/1361-6528/aaafa1
Nat Nanotechnol. 2021;16(9):1019-1029.
doi: 10.1038/s41565-021-00926-z 43. Duan J, Cao Y, Shen Z, et al. 3D bioprinted GelMA/
PEGDA hybrid scaffold for establishing an in vitro model of
40. Han D, Dara L, Win S, et al. Regulation of drug-induced melanoma. J Microbiol Biotechn. 2022;32(4):531-540.
liver injury by signal transduction pathways: critical role of doi: 10.4014/jmb.2111.11003
mitochondria. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2013;34(4):243-253.
doi: 10.1016/j.tips.2013.01.009 44. Wang Z, Abdulla R, Parker B, Samanipour R, Ghosh S, Kim
41. Haapaniemi E, Botla S, Persson J, Schmierer B, Taipale J. K. A simple and high-resolution stereolithography-based 3D
CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing induces a p53-mediated DNA bioprinting system using visible light crosslinkable bioinks.
damage response. Nat Med. 2018;24(7):927-930. Biofabrication. 2015;7(4):45009.
doi: 10.1038/s41591-018-0049-z doi: 10.1088/1758-5090/7/4/045009

Volume 10 Issue 5 (2024) 443 doi: 10.36922/ijb.3898