Page 450 - IJB-10-5
P. 450

International Journal of Bioprinting                            Bioprinting for large-sized tissue delivery




               activity for wound repair at moving parts inspired   27.  Slaughter BV, Khurshid SS, Fisher OZ, Khademhosseini A,
               by commercial adhesive bandages.  Mater Today Adv.   Peppas NA. Hydrogels in regenerative medicine. Adv Mater.
               2024;21:100452.                                    2009;21(32-33):3307-3329.
               doi: 10.1016/j.mtadv.2023.100452                   doi: 10.1002/adma.200802106
            17.  Lewis  JB, Wataha  JC, Messer  RL, Caughman GB,   28.  Wang Z, Kumar H, Tian Z, et al. Visible light photoinitiation
               Yamamoto T, Hsu SD. Blue light differentially alters cellular   of cell-adhesive gelatin methacryloyl hydrogels for
               redox properties.  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater.   stereolithography 3D bioprinting. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces.
               2005;72(2):223-229.                                2018;10(32):26859-26869.
               doi: 10.1002/jbm.b.30126                           doi: 10.1021/acsami.8b06607
            18.  Zhang MD, Huang X, Li Z, et al. White-light-induced   29.  Wang Y, Ma M, Wang J, et al. Development of a photo-
               synthesis of injectable alginate-based composite hydrogels   crosslinking, biodegradable GelMA/PEGDA hydrogel for
               for rapid hemostasis. Mil Med Res. 2023;10(1):47.  guided bone regeneration materials.  Materials  (Basel).
               doi: 10.1186/s40779-023-00483-7                    2018;11(8):1345.
                                                                  doi: 10.3390/ma11081345
            19.  Feng L, Liang S, Zhou Y, et al. Three-dimensional printing
               of hydrogel scaffolds with hierarchical structure for scalable   30.  Nguyen AK, Goering PL, Reipa V, Narayan RJ. Toxicity
               stem cell culture. Acs Biomater Sci Eng. 2020;6(5):2995-3004.  and photosensitizing assessment of gelatin methacryloyl-
               doi: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.9b01825               based hydrogels photoinitiated with lithium phenyl-
                                                                  2,4,6-trimethylbenzoylphosphinate in human primary
            20.  Kumar A, Lee Y, Kim D, et al. Effect of crosslinking   renal proximal tubule epithelial cells.  Biointerphases.
               functionality on microstructure, mechanical properties,   2019;14(2):021007.
               and in vitro cytocompatibility of cellulose nanocrystals      doi: 10.1116/1.5095886
               reinforced poly (vinyl alcohol)/sodium alginate hybrid
               scaffolds. Int J Biol Macromol. 2017;95:962-973.  31.  Grigoryan B, Paulsen SJ, Corbett DC, et al. Multivascular
               doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2016.10.085                networks and functional intravascular topologies within
                                                                  biocompatible hydrogels. Science. 2019;364(6439):458-464.
            21.  Joyce K, Fabra GT, Bozkurt Y, Pandit A. Bioactive potential      doi: 10.1126/science.aav9750
               of natural biomaterials: identification, retention and
               assessment of biological properties. Signal Transduct Target   32.  He B, Wang J, Xie M, et al. 3D printed biomimetic epithelium/
               Ther. 2021;6(1):122.                               stroma bilayer hydrogel implant for corneal regeneration.
               doi: 10.1038/s41392-021-00512-8                    Bioact Mater. 2022;17:234-247.
                                                                  doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2022.01.034
            22.  Ghavaminejad A, Ashammakhi N, Wu XY, Khademhosseini
               A. Crosslinking strategies for 3D bioprinting of polymeric   33.  Li W, Hu X, Liu H, et al. 3D light-curing printing to
               hydrogels. Small. 2020;16(35):e2002931.            construct versatile octopus-bionic patches. J Mater Chem B.
               doi: 10.1002/smll.202002931                        2023;11(22):5010-5020.
                                                                  doi: 10.1039/d3tb00590a
            23.  Yue K, Trujillo-De SG, Alvarez MM, Tamayol A, Annabi N,
               Khademhosseini A. Synthesis, properties, and biomedical   34.  Qiu L, Liu JZ, Chang SLY, Wu Y, Li D. Biomimetic
               applications of gelatin methacryloyl (GelMA) hydrogels.   superelastic graphene-based cellular monoliths.  Nat
               Biomaterials. 2015;73:254-271.                     Commun. 2012;3:1241.
               doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.08.045            doi: 10.1038/ncomms2251
            24.  Sharifi S, Sharifi H, Akbari A, Chodosh J. Systematic   35.  Zhao Y, Li Y, Mao S, Sun W, Yao R. The influence of
               optimization  of  visible  light-induced  crosslinking  printing parameters on cell survival rate and printability
               conditions of gelatin methacryloyl (GelMA). Sci Rep. 2021;   in microextrusion-based 3D cell printing technology.
               11(1):23276.                                       Biofabrication. 2015;7(4):45002.
               doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-02830-x                    doi: 10.1088/1758-5090/7/4/045002
            25.  Bahney CS, Lujan TJ, Hsu CW, Bottlang M, West JL,   36.  Ouyang L, Yao R, Zhao Y, Sun W. Effect of bioink properties
               Johnstone B. Visible light photoinitiation of mesenchymal   on printability and cell viability for 3D bioplotting of
               stem cell-laden bioresponsive hydrogels.  Eur Cell Mater.   embryonic stem cells. Biofabrication. 2016;8(3):35020.
               2011;22:43-55.                                     doi: 10.1088/1758-5090/8/3/035020
               doi: 10.22203/ecm.v022a04                       37.  Gripon  P, Rumin S,  Urban  S, et  al. Infection  of a  human
            26.  Bryant SJ, Nuttelman CR, Anseth KS. Cytocompatibility of   hepatoma cell line by hepatitis B virus. Proc Natl Acad Sci
               UV and visible light photoinitiating systems on  cultured   USA. 2002;99(24):15655–15660.
               NIH/3T3 fibroblasts in vitro.  J Biomater Sci Polym Ed.      doi: 10.1073/pnas.232137699
               2000;11(5):439-457.                             38.  Roulot D, Czernichow S, Le Clesiau H, Costes JL, Vergnaud
               doi: 10.1163/156856200743805                       AC, Beaugrand M. Liver stiffness values in apparently


            Volume 10 Issue 5 (2024)                       442                                doi: 10.36922/ijb.3898
   445   446   447   448   449   450   451   452   453   454   455