Page 517 - IJB-10-5
P. 517

International Journal of Bioprinting                          3D model of neurogenesis in Alzheimer’s disease




            characteristics. 47,48  The presence of GEL facilitates rapid   degradation. Additionally, Sonaye  et al.  demonstrated
                                                                                                53
            gelation of the construct during the bioprinting process   that higher concentrations of ALG (8–12%) compared to
            at room temperature (compared to ALG-crosslinked   GEL (6%), along with high crosslinking concentrations of
            with Ca  alone) and strengthens the ALG structure in a   CaCl  (300–500 mM), enhanced the swelling capacity and
                  2+
                                                                   2
            thermoresponsive manner, consequently improving the   decreased the breakdown rate of hydrogels.
            initial stability of the hydrogel.  Therefore, considering   Considering the swelling profile (Figure 1F), when
                                      36
            that the optimal polymeric concentration of a hydrogel   constructs were incubated in DMEM/F12 or dH O, the
            should range from 10 to 20%,  our formulation consisted   percentage of wet mass on day 2 was approximately 40%
                                    49
                                                                                                       2
            of 6% ALG + 4% GEL, leveraging the advantages of both   greater than the dry mass on day 0, demonstrating that
            polymers and displaying great promise for modeling the   constructs are easily tumefied by medium (or dH O)
            NSC environment (Figure S1, Supporting Information;                                            2
            Videos S1–S4, Supporting Information). 28,33       absorption. Over time, the swelling rate gradually
                                                               decreased, as the structures degraded. Sonaye  et al.
                                                                                                            53
               Figures 1–3 present the characterization of both the   reported a  similar phenomenon with their  ALG-GEL
            hydrogel  and  the bioprinted  construct.  The  polymeric   hydrogels. Scaffolds with a greater ALG concentration
            blend was first printed without cells to determine the   swelled by 70%, peaking at day 4 to a saturation point,
            best design for printability and to measure wettability,   and started to disintegrate on day 8. As a result, their 3D
            surface roughness/porosity, degradation, and swelling   model completely degraded within 14 days of incubation
            rates. Furthermore, the mechanical and structural   in DMEM. Kaliampakou and colleagues  also tested
                                                                                                  50
            characteristics, as well as the electrical conductivity, were   multiple blends of ALG-GEL hydrogels with varying
            evaluated accordingly.                             CaCl   concentrations  and  crosslinking  durations.  They
                                                                   2
               Code 2 (Figure 1A) was designed for the characterization   described that the best configuration (8% ALG+ 4% GEL;
            assays. The wettability profile of the bioprinted hydrogel   248 mM CaCl ; 15 min crosslinking) resulted in a hydrogel
                                                                          2
            (crosslinked or not) is presented in Figure 1B, displaying   degradation time of ~20 days with a swelling ratio of 50%.
            snapshots and contact angle measurements every 2      Unlike the constructs generated in the present study,
            min until complete absorption of a drop of water into   none of the aforementioned materials was able to maintain
            the samples. The initial contact angle of the crosslinked   their structure for the achieved benchmark duration of
            hydrogel was 55.3 ± 0.2°, while that of the non-crosslinked   28 days. Thus, the 6% ALG+ 4% GEL hydrogel produced
            hydrogel was 30.4 ± 0.4°. The crosslinked hydrogel fully   constructs capable of retaining cell culture medium while
            absorbed the water droplet after 38 min, while the non-  also facilitating the diffusion of soluble components for
            crosslinked hydrogel took less than 2 min, indicating   supporting cellular growth within the core without entirely
            that crosslinking is essential to harden the material while   degrading the 3D structure in a short period.
            maintaining its hydrophilicity.
                                                                  The construct’s morphology, analyzed by SEM,
                Hydrogel degradation was monitored for 28 days, with   maintained a smooth and uniform surface for up to 14
            constructs immersed in dH O or DMEM/F12 at 37°C and   days (Figure 1C). Polymeric homogeneity represents an
                                  2
            5% CO  (Figure 1E). In both conditions, the constructs   important attribute of the hydrogel because heterogeneity
                  2
            maintained approximately 50% of their initial weight (49.6   in its structure can jeopardize cellular adhesion and
            ± 4.6% in DMEM/F12; 46.9 ± 4.2% in dH O) (p < 0.001   survival due to the formation of polymeric clumps and
                                              2
            relative to their respective initial weight), suggesting that,   cytotoxic aggregates. 54
            despite the high degradability rate, constructs preserved
            their 3D structure for nearly a month. The sustained   The size loss displayed in Figure 1D could be attributable
            degradation over time might increase the construct’s   to GEL thermal stability, as it can liquefy and release from
            porosity and promote essential biological functions, as cells   the construct when incubated at 37°C. 52,55  Despite this,
            are  more  prone  to  migrate,  proliferate,  and  differentiate   our hydrogel lasted longer than any ALG-GEL blend cited
            when the surrounding network structure is less dense. 50  in this section, indicating that this composition delayed
                                                               GEL release from the scaffolds by trapping it within the
               Several factors may have influenced the degradability              55
            rate of the hydrogel, such as the concentration and duration   crosslinked ALG blocks.
            of CaCl  crosslinking, the M  of ALG, the concentration   Rheological  analysis  was  performed  to  investigate
                  2
                                   W
            of both polymers, and the swelling rate 35,45,50–53 . Freeman   the fluidity and viscoelastic behavior of the hydrogel, as
            and Kelly  reported that low-M  ALG hydrogels (3.5%)   well as its viscosity under constant shear stress and strain
                    51
                                      W
            had significant degradation over 21 days in culture, while   (Figure 2). These assessments can provide key information
            high-M  ALG  hydrogels (3.5%)  displayed little  to no   about the printability of the hydrogel, the impact of forces
                  W
            Volume 10 Issue 5 (2024)                       509                                doi: 10.36922/ijb.3751
   512   513   514   515   516   517   518   519   520   521   522