Page 28 - IJB-6-1
P. 28

Digital light processing based 3D printing for medical applications
           the platform and the printed surface. Meanwhile,        Light Processing 3D Printing for Highly Functionally Graded
           more clinical researches and improved law systems       Materials.  Sci Adv,  5(5):eaav5790.  DOI:  10.1126/sciadv.
           are required to regulate the use of 3D printed          aav5790.
           products. The clinical researches would provide a   7.   Pateman CJ, Harding AJ, Glen A, et al., 2015, Nerve Guides
           good foundation for making the rules. These, the        Manufactured from Photocurable Polymers to Aid Peripheral
           rules could guide doctors or researchers to use 3D      Nerve  Repair.  Biomaterials,  49:13.  DOI:    10.1016/j.
           printing technology for medical applications.           biomaterials.2015.01.055.
                                                               8.   Gou M, Qu X, Zhu W, et al., 2014, Bio-Inspired Detoxification
           Author contributions                                    Using  3D-Printed  Hydrogel  Nanocomposites.  Nat Commun,
                                                                   5:3774. DOI: 10.1038/ncomms4774.
           J. Z. and Q. H. are co-first authors, who contributed   9.   Grigoryan  B,  Paulsen  SJ,  Corbett  DC,  et  al.,  2019,
           equally to this work. S. W., J. T. and M.G. gave        Multivascular  Networks  and  Functional  Intravascular
           advice  and  discussion.  M.  G.  supervised  the       Topologies Within Biocompatible Hydrogels. Science, 364:8.
           project. All  authors  read  and  approved  the  final   10.  Liu  X,  Tao  J,  Liu  J, et  al., 2019, 3D Printing  Enabled
           manuscript.
                                                                   Customization  of  Functional  Microgels.  ACS Appl  Mater
           Conflict of interest                                    Interfaces, 11(13):12209–15. DOI: 10.1021/acsami.8b18701.
                                                               11.  Hull  CW,  Spence  ST,  Lewis  CW, et  al., 1998,
           No conflict of interest was reported by the authors.    Stereolithographic Curl Reduction. US, US 5772947 A.
                                                               12.  Ngo  TD,  Kashani A,  Imbalzano  G, et al.,  2018, Additive
           Acknowledgments                                         Manufacturing  (3D  Printing):  A  Review  of  Materials,

           This  work  was  supported  by  the  Key  Research      Methods,  Applications  and  Challenges.  Compos  Part  B,
           and Development Projects of People’s Liberation         143:172–96. DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.02.012.
           Army     (BWS17J036),     1·3·5    project   for    13.  Ligon SC, Liska R, Stampfl J, et al., 2017, Polymers for 3D
           disciplines  of  excellence,  West  China  Hospital,    Printing and Customized Additive Manufacturing. Chem Rev,
           Sichuan  University  (ZYJC18017)  and  the              117(15):10212–90. DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00074.
           Science  and  Technology  Project  of Chengdu       14.  Vijayavenkataraman  S,  Yan  WC,  Lu  WF, et  al., 2018,
           (2018-CY02-00041-GX).                                   3D  Bioprinting  of  Tissues  and  Organs  for  Regenerative
                                                                   Medicine. Adv Drug Deliv Rev, 132:296–332. DOI: 10.1016/j.
           References                                              addr.2018.07.004.
                                                               15.  Zhu W, Ma X, Gou M, et al., 2016, 3D Printing of Functional
           1.   Kang  HW,  Lee  SJ,  Ko  IK, et  al., 2016, A 3D Bioprinting   Biomaterials  for Tissue  Engineering.  Curr Opin Biotechnol,
               System  to Produce  Human-Scale  Tissue Constructs   40:103–12. DOI: 10.1016/j.copbio.2016.03.014.
               with  Structural  Integrity.  Nat Biotechnol,  34(3):312–9.   16.  Soman  P,  Chung  PH,  Zhang  AP, et  al., 2013, Digital
               DOI: 10.1038/nbt.3413.                              Microfabrication  of  User-Defined  3D  Microstructures  in
           2.   Murphy SV, Atala A, 2014, 3D Bioprinting of Tissues and   Cell-Laden Hydrogels. Biotechnol Bioeng, 110(11):3038–47.
               Organs.  Nat Biotechnol,  32(8):  773–85.  DOI:  10.1038/  DOI: 10.1002/bit.24957.
               nbt.2958.                                       17.  Xue  D,  Wang  Y,  Zhang  J, et al., 2018, Projection-Based
           3.   Ricles JCC, Di Prima M, Oh SS, 2018, Regulating 3D-Printed   3D Printing  of Cell  Patterning  Scaffolds with  Multiscale
               Medical Products. Sci Transl Med, 10(461):6.        Channels.  ACS  Appl Mater Interfaces,  10(23):19428–35.
           4.   Rybicki  FJ,  2018,  Medical  3D  Printing  and  the  Physician-  DOI: 10.1021/acsami.8b03867.
               Artist.  Lancet,  391(10121):651–2.  DOI:  10.1016/s0140-  18  Saha SK,  Wang D,  Nguyen  VH,  et al.,  2019,  Scalable
               6736(18)30212-5.                                    Submicrometer   Additive   Manufacturing.   Science,
           5.   Lu Y, Mapili G, Suhali G, et al., 2006, A Digital Micro-Mirror   366(6461):105-109. DOI: 10.1126/science.aax8760.
               Device-Based System for the Microfabrication of Complex,   19.  Bernal  PN,  Delrot  P,  Loterie  D, et al.,  2019, Volumetric
               Spatially Patterned Tissue Engineering Scaffolds. J Biomed   Bioprinting  of  Complex  Living-Tissue  Constructs  Within
               Mater Res A, 77(2):396–405. DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.30601.  Seconds.  Adv Mater,  31:e1904209.  DOI:  10.1002/
           6.   Kuang  X,  Wu  J,  Chen  K, et al., 2019, Grayscale Digital   adma.201904209.
           24                          International Journal of Bioprinting (2020)–Volume 6, Issue 1
   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33