Page 75 - IJB-6-1
P. 75

Lee, et al.
           compatibility are needed when adopting such file    8.   Ozbolat IT, Hospodiuk M, 2016, Current Advances and Future
           segmentation  method across  different bioprinter       Perspectives in Extrusion-based  Bioprinting.  Biomaterials,
           setup. Fragmenting CAD models and printing 3D           76:321–343. DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.10.076.
           bioprinted models into small section invoke novel   9.   Lee H,  Ahn S, Bonassar LJ,  et al., 2013, Cell-laden
           bioprinting approaches for structures that are          Poly(varepsilon-Caprolactone)/Alginate  Hybrid Scaffolds
           more organic and closer to nature. Future studies       Fabricated  by  an  Aerosol  Cross-Linking  Process for
           may include cells in the build material printing to     Obtaining  Homogeneous  Cell  Distribution:  Fabrication,
           study cell responses with the improved BioSeg file      Seeding Efficiency, and Cell Proliferation and Distribution.
           processing method.                                      Tissue Eng Part C Methods, 19:784–793. DOI: 10.1089/ten.
                                                                   tec.2012.0651.
           Acknowledgment                                      10.  Billiet T, Gevaert E, De Schryver T,  et al., 2014, The 3D

           This research  is supported by the National             Printing  of Gelatin  Methacrylamide  Cell-laden  Tissue-
           Research  Foundation,  Prime  Minister’s  Office,       engineered Constructs with High Cell Viability. Biomaterials,
           Singapore under its Medium-Sized Centre funding         35:49–62. DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.09.078.
           scheme and by NTU startup grant.                    11.  Duan B, Hockaday LA, Kang KH, et al., 2013, 3D Bioprinting
                                                                   of Heterogeneous  Aortic  Valve Conduits with  Alginate/
           Conflicts of interest                                   Gelatin Hydrogels. J Biomed Mater Res A, 101:1255–1264.
                                                                   DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.34420.
           There are no conflicts of interest to declare.      12.  Fedorovich NE,  Wijnberg HM, Dhert  WJ,  et al., 2011,
           References                                              Distinct  Tissue Formation by Heterogeneous Printing of
                                                                   Osteo and Endothelial Progenitor Cells. Tissue Eng Part A,
           1.   Zhuang P, Sun AX, An  J,  et al., 2018, 3D  Neural  Tissue   17:2113–2121. DOI: 10.1089/ten.tea.2011.0019.
               Models: From Spheroids to Bioprinting.  Biomaterials,   13.  Huang  Y, He K,  Wang X, 2013, Rapid Prototyping of a
               154:113–133. DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.10.002.  Hybrid Hierarchical  Polyurethane-Cell/Hydrogel  Construct
           2.   Ng WL, Chua CK, Shen YF, 2019, Print Me An Organ! Why   for Regenerative  Medicine.  Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol
               We Are  Not There Yet.  Prog Polym Sci,  97:101145. DOI:   Appl, 33:3220–3229. DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2013.03.048.
               10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2019.101145.             14.  Ozbolat IT, Chen H, Yu Y, 2014, Development of “Multi-Arm
           3.   Kolan KCR, Semon JA, Bromet B, et al., 2019, Bioprinting   Bioprinter” for Hybrid Biofabrication of Tissue Engineering
               with Human Stem Cells-Laden Alginate-gelatin Bioink and   Constructs. Robot. Comput. Integr. Manuf, 30:295–304. DOI:
               Bioactive Glass for Tissue Engineering. Int J Bioprint, 5:13.   10.1016/j.rcim.2013.10.005.
               DOI: 10.18063/ijb.v5i2.2.204.                   15.  Shim JH,  Lee JS,  Kim JY,  et al., 2012, Bioprinting of a
           4.   Xu T, Zhao W, Zhu JM, et al., 2013, Complex Heterogeneous   Mechanically  Enhanced  Three-dimensional  Dual  Cell-
               Tissue Constructs Containing Multiple Cell Types Prepared   Laden Construct for Osteochondral  Tissue Engineering
               by Inkjet  Printing  Technology.  Biomaterials,  34:130–139.   Using a Multi-Head  Tissue/Organ Building System.
               DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.09.035.            J  Micromech Microeng,  22:085014. DOI: 10.1088/0960-
           5.   Guillemot  F,  Guillotin  B,  Fontaine A,  et  al.,  2011, Laser-  1317/22/8/085014.
               assisted Bioprinting to Deal  with  Tissue Complexity  in   16.  Snyder JE, Hamid Q, Wang C, et al., 2011, Bioprinting Cell-
               Regenerative  Medicine.  MRS Bull,  36:1015–1019. DOI:   laden Matrigel for Radioprotection Study of Liver by Pro-drug
               10.1557/mrs.2011.272.                               Conversion in a Dual-tissue Microfluidic Chip. Biofabrication,
           6.   Lee  YB, Polio S, Lee  W,  et al., Bio-printing of Collagen   3:034112. DOI: 10.1088/1758-5082/3/3/034112.
               and VEGF-Releasing Fibrin Gel Scaffolds for Neural Stem   17.  Visser J, Peters B, Burger TJ, et al., 2013, Biofabrication of Multi-
               Cell Culture.  Exp Neurol,  223:645–652. DOI: 10.1016/j.  material Anatomically Shaped Tissue Constructs. Biofabrication,
               expneurol.2010.02.014.                              5:035007. DOI: 10.1088/1758-5082/5/3/035007.
           7.   Skardal A, Mack D, Kapetanovic E, et al., 2012, Bioprinted   18.  Lee W, Lee V, Polio S, et al., 2009, Three-dimensional Cell-
               Amniotic Fluid-derived Stem Cells  Accelerate  Healing of   hydrogel Printer Using Electromechanical  Microvalve  for
               Large  Skin Wounds.  Stem  Cells  Transl Med,  1:792–802.   Tissue Engineering.  In: Solid-State Sensors, Actuators and
               DOI: 10.5966/sctm.2012-0088.                        Microsystems  Conference,  2009.  TRANSDUCERS 2009,
                                       International Journal of Bioprinting (2020)–Volume 6, Issue 1        71
   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80