Page 70 - IJB-6-2
P. 70

Carbon nanomaterials reinforced scaffolds for bone repair
           compressive  modulus  ranging  from  50  to  1500   decreases  to  87.91  ±  1.71°  after  10  s,  typical  of
           MPa  with  the  mean  value  of  194  MPa,  and  the   hydrophobic  surfaces.  In  the  case  of  scaffolds
           compressive strength ranging from 1 to 30 MPa       containing G, the values are lower than PCL scaffolds,
           with the mean value of 3.55 MPa [35-38] .           ranging between 87.25 ± 0.82° (1 wt.% G) to 84.12
                                                               ± 1.44° (3 wt.% G) at 0 s and 86.10 ± 0.74° (1 wt.%
           3.3 Surface wettability evaluation
                                                               G) to 82.40 ± 0.92° (3 wt.% G) after 10 s. In the
           Table 2 shows the WCA results at 0, 5, and 10 s     case of scaffolds containing GO, the values are also
           after the water droplet was dropped on the samples   lower than PCL scaffolds, ranging between 82.79 ±
           surfaces. PCL scaffolds present the highest contact   0.35° (1 wt.% GO) and 82.03 ± 1.47° (3 wt.% GO)
           angle value of 89.28 ± 1.36° at 0 s which slightly   at 0 s. After 10 s, the values vary between 81.73 ±
                                                               0.06° (1 wt.% GO) and 81.52 ± 1.52° (2 wt.% G).
                                                               Changes on the wettability, particularly in the case
                                                               of GO, can be attributed to the hydrophilic O, OH,
                                                               and  COOH  groups  of  the  GO  nanosheets.  These
                                                               results also show that the addition of G and GO has
                                                               a minor effect on the contact angle.

                                                               3.4 Biological studies

                                                               Confocal microscopy images (Figure 5), showing
                                                               cell  nuclei  stained  blue  and  cell  actin  stained
                                                               green, suggest that all scaffolds can support cell
                                                               attachment  and  proliferation  along  the  fibers.
                                                               Figure  6  shows  the  metabolic  activity  of  cells
                                                               at different time points after cell seeding. In this
                                                               figure, the fluorescence intensity is proportional to
           Figure 3. Strain-stress curve of different scaffolds.  the number of metabolically active cells.


                        A                                   B
















           Figure  4.  Mechanical  properties  of  scaffolds  with  different  material  composition  (A)  compressive
           modulus; (B) compressive strength (n = 5).

           Table 2. WCA results of scaffolds with different carbon material contents after 0, 5, and 10 s (n=5).

           Time        PCL        1 wt.% G     2 wt.% G     3 wt.% G     1 wt.% GO    2 wt.% GO     3 wt.% GO
           0 s      89.28±1.36°  87.25±0.82°  84.13±0.50°  84.12±1.44°   82.79±0.35°  82.22±0.89°   82.03±1.47°
           5 s      88.48±1.82°  86.41±0.81°  83.73±0.66°  83.64±1.43°   82.07±0.35°  81.62±1.48°   81.67±1.28°
           10 s     87.91±1.71°  86.10±0.74°  83.30±1.06°   82.40±0.92°  81.73±0.06°   81.52±1.52°  81.57±1.26°
           WCA: Water-in-air contact angle

           66                          International Journal of Bioprinting (2020)–Volume 6, Issue 2
   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75