Page 277 - IJB-10-6
P. 277

International Journal of Bioprinting                             Skin bioprinting: Keratinocytes and stem cells




            calculating the area of the well bottom covered by living   The keratinocytes seeded into hydrogels I (Alg/Gel), V
            cells using Image J. HaCaTs and ADSCs were differentiated   (Alg/Gel/HA), and VI (GelMA) formed fewer but larger
            based on their morphology in the live/dead staining.  colonies.  The  images  of  HaCaT  within  the  different
                                                               hydrogels indicate good cell survival, i.e., without any
            2.5. Statistical analysis                          notable dead cells.
            All experiments were performed in triplicate, and results
            were analyzed using Graph Pad Prism 10 (GraphPad   3.2. Material characterization of hydrogels
            Software Inc., USA). Data are presented as the mean ±   Characterizations of all hydrogels (listed in  Table 2) are
            standard deviation or box plots with whiskers. The p-value   presented in this section.
            was set to ≤0.05 to define statistical significance. Differences
            between the groups were analyzed using a t-test and two-  3.2.1. Printability assay
            way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Tukey’s multiple   As illustrated in  Figure 5, hydrogels IV, V, and VI
            comparisons for assessing cell viability and metabolic   demonstrated  good  printability.  The  printability  of
            activity. For the transwell model, two-way ANOVA with   hydrogel II was immeasurable as the hydrogel deliquesced
            Tukey’s multiple comparisons and Fisher’s Least significant   right after extrusion from the printing nozzle. Therefore,
            difference  (LSD)  were  used for  analysis.  The  stiffness  of   fibrinogen was enriched with 1% (m/v) Alg and 1% (m/v)
            the biofabricated constructs was analyzed with two-way   HA (i.e., hydrogen III), resulting in a DCR of 0.30. For
            ANOVA and three-way ANOVA with  Fisher’s LSD  test.   hydrogels V and VI, the highest DCR was observed at 0.40
                                                               and 0.42, respectively. Hydrogels I and IV reported the
            Three-way ANOVA with Fisher’s LSD test was also used   lowest DCR of 0.24 and 0.29, respectively.
            to analyze the degradation results. Figures 1 and 3 were
            created with biorender.                            3.2.2. Microstructure and material properties
                                                               The hydrogels were analyzed on day 1 using cryo-SEM
            3. Results                                         (Figure 6). No significant difference in pore size was
            3.1. Cell viability of HaCaT in co-culture with ADSCs   observed when comparing hydrogels I–IV. Hydrogel VI
            in a transwell model                               exhibited smaller pores than the other samples. The pore
            The metabolic activity of the cell cultures within the   sizes ranged from 0.21 (hydrogel VI) to 1.03 (hydrogel
            transwells was measured on days 1, 4, and 7. All samples   V). Hydrogel V has a less homogenous pore distribution
            (listed in Table 1) exhibited increased metabolic activity   compared with the other hydrogels (Figure 6A).
            over 7 days (Figure 4A). Analysis of the metabolic rate   Measuring the mechanical properties of the hydrogels
            suggests that time played a significant role for all groups,   on day 1 revealed notable differences (Figure 7). All
            except group IV (Alg/Gel/collagen/HA).             hydrogels, except for hydrogel IV (Alg/Gel/collagen/HA),
               Hydrogels I (Alg/Gel), II (Fib), and VI (GelMA)   primarily exhibit elastic properties, with a higher storage
            displayed significantly higher cell metabolic activity on   modulus than loss modulus. Hydrogel IV exhibited much
            day 7 compared with day 1 for the co-culture and control   higher viscous properties, resulting in a less stable hydrogel
            (without ADSCs) groups. Additionally, cells seeded   that could barely be  transferred into the rheometer.
            within hydrogel II demonstrated a significant increase   Hydrogel VI (GelMA) was the softest hydrogel. The other
                                                               hydrogels were in a similar range throughout the tested
            in  metabolic  activity  from  days  1  to 4  for  the  group   frequency range.
            containing HaCaT and ADSC co-culture. Although the
            difference in metabolic activity of hydrogel V between   Hydrogels that could not be printed (I, II, and III) or
            days 1 and 7 was less pronounced compared to the other   unstable (IV) were not suitable for use as biofabricated
            bioinks, it was still statistically significant. The metabolic   constructs. However, hydrogel III, despite issues with
            activity of cells within the collagen-elastin template matrix   shape fidelity, was still used in the pockets of the constructs
            was  significantly  higher  on  day  7  compared  with  day  1   due to its high cell compatibility.
            for the co-culture group. Samples containing HaCaT and
            ADSCs  in  hydrogels  II  (Fib)  and  III  (collagen-elastin   3.2.3. Diffusion assay
            template  matrix)  exhibited  increased  metabolic  activity   A diffusion assay was performed to evaluate the diffusion
            in comparison to the groups without ADSCs. The weakest   characteristics of the hydrogels (Figure 8). For this assay,
            metabolic activity was observed for hydrogel IV (Alg/  HEK-293 cells producing a 150 kDa protein with a
            Gel/collagen/HA). Hydrogel II and the collagen-elastin   luciferase domain were implanted into the hydrogels.
            template matrix reported the highest metabolic activity.   An increase in protein concentration was measured
            Within these hydrogels, cells proliferated rapidly and   over 7 days in the supernatant for all hydrogels, suggesting
            formed multiple small colonies, i.e., visible in Figure 4B.   HEK-293 proliferation and diffusion of the protein into the

            Volume 10 Issue 6 (2024)                       269                                doi: 10.36922/ijb.3925
   272   273   274   275   276   277   278   279   280   281   282