Page 420 - IJB-10-6
P. 420

International Journal of Bioprinting                                 3D-bioprinted respiratory disease model




            crosslinker and extended crosslinking time were selected   Cross- sectionalarea =
            to avoid concerns regarding toxic effects on cells, as the                              π ∗∗ 9mm 
            use of molds and bulk material requires a longer time for   60  × (    measured averagestranddiameter × ) +2     
            the crosslinking solution to permeate the entire structure.                              2   
            The samples were then removed from the molds and      This assumption was reasonable to account for the
            sectioned into discs with a diameter of 10 mm and a   spreading of printed strands over the bottom layer while
            height of 5 mm. These discs were then placed in 3D culture   also taking design factors into account.
            media and incubated in static or dynamic conditions over
            a 28-day period. At timepoints of 1, 7, 14, and 28 days,   2.11. Live/dead assay
            specimens (n = 12) were loaded onto the stage of a BOSE   A Live/Dead Cell Viability Assay Kit (ab287858, Lot
            BioDynamic 5010 Mechanical Tester and compressed at   1021052604; Abcam, UK) was used to determine cellular
            a rate of 0.01 mm/s to a total deformation of 2 mm at   viability throughout 28 days of culture in both static
            25°C. The force and displacement recorded were then   and dynamic conditions, and later during the two-day
            used  to evaluate the  compressive  modulus  of  the  bulk   infection period. Briefly, samples (n = 3) were washed
            material. The linear viscoelastic region was determined   once with Hanks buffered salt solution (HBSS; 14025-
            using linear fitting in Excel. Visually, the expected linear   076, Lot 2537086; Gibco, USA), before 0.5 mL of 0.1%
            zone was identified, and a linear fit was plotted. The fit   dead stain and 0.2% live stain buffer solution was added
            linear viscoelastic region was then extended through the   to each sample. Samples were incubated for 15 min
            data in both directions separately until the R-value of the   before imaging with a BioTek Lionheart LX automated
            fit decreased below 0.95.                          fluorescence microscope.
            2.10. Tensile testing of bioprinted scaffolds      2.12. XTT assay
            Cell-free scaffolds for tensile testing were printed as   A CyQuant XTT Cell Viability assay kit (X12223;
            cylindrical shapes (3 mm height and 9 mm diameter)   Invitrogen, USA) was used for the determination of cellular
            with 1 mm lattice spacing, except the top two layers   metabolism throughout both the 28-day culture period
            that were printed  as solid layers with a strand  spacing   and the two-day infection period. Briefly, the XTT reagents
            of 0.27 mm. During testing, the tensile force pulls the   were thawed at 37°C in a water bath; 0.2 mL XTT reagent
            structures apart along the z-axis, causing failure in the   A/well was combined with 0.014 mL electron coupling
            lattice region within the scaffold. Due to this, as long as   reagent/well and mixed. In each well of interest, culture
            the lattice design remained the same between scaffolds,   media was removed and replaced with 0.8 mL of fresh
            the properties measured remained consistent. Therefore,   culture media before 200 µL of the XTT reagent mixture
            the scaffold design used for tensile testing was slightly   was added. The samples (n = 3) were then incubated for 4
            adjusted from that of all other studies to allow for the   h before 200 µL of the media was removed and plated in a
            greatest compatibility with the tensile testing apparatus,   96-well plate. Standard solutions of XTT reagent mixture
            while also being representative of all the scaffolds utilized   with culture media were also plated in the 96-well plate as
            in this study. After being immersed in the crosslinking   blanks. An xMark microplate spectrophotometer was then
            solution for 10 min, the media was replaced with 3D   used to measure absorbance at both 450 and 660 nm, with
            culture media, and the constructs were incubated in static   final measurements being calculated as:
            or dynamic conditions over a 28-day period. At the set
            timepoints of 1, 7, 14, and 28 days, constructs (n = 6), still        (450 nm test reading−450
            adhered to the bottom of the plate they were printed in,       Absorbance =  nm blank reading)−660 nm   (II)
            were tensile-tested at a rate of 50 µm/s until failure or a         test reading
            maximum displacement of 5 mm to determine the tensile   2.13. Infection
            strength of the lattice structure. This crosshead speed   2D infection experiments on A549s, HBEpCs, and HPFs
            was selected based on previous tests that determined   were carried out to generate a baseline of data for the
            this setting resulted in the most consistent results. The   infectivity of primary cell types and their cytokine response.
            measured load and displacement were then used to   Briefly, each cell type was seeded into a 6-well plate and
            determine the Young’s modulus and ultimate tensile   cultured in standard culture conditions until confluent
            strength (UTS) of the printed constructs. Cross-sectional   (24 h). Cells were infected at a multiplicity of infection
            area was calculated as per Equation II:            (MOI) of 5 with PR8 wild-type IAV. Briefly, the required





            Volume 10 Issue 6 (2024)                       412                                doi: 10.36922/ijb.3895
   415   416   417   418   419   420   421   422   423   424   425