Page 509 - IJB-10-6
P. 509

International Journal of Bioprinting                              Redefined collagen inks in cartilage printing




            analysis (GSEA). Curated gene sets from the (molecular   3. Results and discussion
            signature  database  of  the  Broad  Institute)  for  cartilage   3.1. Characterization of the extract
            development and  chondrocyte  development (GOBP_   The quality of the extracted collagen was ascertained by
            CHONDROCYTE_DEVELOPMENT,         M11483,   and     Coomassie-stained SDS-PAGE, DSC, and hydroxyproline
            GOBP_CARTILAGE_DEVELOPMENT, M10512) were           assay  (Figure  S1,  Supporting  Information).  The
            used to assess chondrogenesis and compare between cells   electrophoretogram contains typical collagen type I
            printed in pure collagen and biofunctionalized collagen   bands around 115–120 kDa, corresponding to the α1 and
            of genes with >1.5-fold change expression compared to   α2 chains, and two bands at >200 kDa, attributed to β
            2D control (SVF cells grown under standard monolayer   dimers.  The thermogram also contains a typical narrow
                                                                     37
            conditions) and <0.05 false discovery rate (FDR) adjusted   endothermic transition centered at 41.6°C. The total
                                                         35
            p-value. Gene ontology (GO) analyses with ShinyGO 0.80    collagen content is >90% of the dry mass.
            and StringDB  were used with upregulated genes, while
                       36
            Venny 2.1 (https://bioinfogp.cnb.csic.es/tools/venny/) was   3.2. Kinetics of thermal crosslinking and
                                                               hydrogel properties
            used to create Venn diagrams.                      The gelation temperature affects collagen fibril length
            2.10. Statistical analysis                         and thickness, both of which are relevant to collagen inks
                                                                                                     25
            Raw data from post-printing cell viability, collagenase   printed without and within a supporting medium.  In direct
            stability, and printed strand spreading analyses, as well   bioprinting, without a supporting medium, the extruded
            as rheometry and optical extinction, were imported   filament is instantly exposed to 37°C, which corresponds
                                                               to a fast ramp rate, rapidly stabilizing the printed structure.
            into Microsoft Excel. They were analyzed by the in-built   In contrast, bioprinting within a supporting medium is
            functions for single factor analysis of variation (ANOVA),   typically performed initially at room temperature, with a
            followed by a post-hoc Student’s t-test, taking into account   subsequent increase in the temperature to 37°C at a slow
            homoscedasticity as determined by  F-tests. Confidence   rate of 1°/min.  Despite differences  in fiber morphology,
            intervals for the means at a 95% confidence level were   our rheological analysis did not identify significant
            calculated and plotted as error bars. GO analyses were   differences between the equilibrium Gʹ values of collagen
                                                   36
                                      35
            performed with ShinyGO 0.80  and StringDB ; Venn   solutions crosslinked at 37°C after a ramp rate of ~30°/
            diagrams were plotted using Venny 2.1.             min and 1°/min (Figure 1). In both cases, a Gʹ of ~1 kPa































            Figure 1. Rheometry results in oscillation mode, i.e., storage modulus (Gʹ; blue) and loss modulus (Gʹ; red), revealing thermal gelation of 0.5% collagen
            solution after heating (a) to 37°C at 30°/min and (b) to 50°C at 1°/min. Inset plots display the ratio of loss modulus to storage modulus, presented in %,
            marking the biomimetic value of 10%.


            Volume 10 Issue 6 (2024)                       501                                doi: 10.36922/ijb.4566
   504   505   506   507   508   509   510   511   512   513   514