Page 589 - IJB-10-6

International Journal of Bioprinting Biomechanical analysis of mandibular implants

27. Moiduddin K, Anwar S, Ahmed N, Ashfaq M, Al-Ahmari A. 31. Arabnejad S, Johnston B, Tanzer M, Pasini D. Fully
Computer assisted design and analysis of customized porous porous 3D printed titanium femoral stem to reduce stress-
plate for mandibular reconstruction. Irbm. 2017;38(2):78-89. shielding following total hip arthroplasty. J Orthop Res.
doi: 10.1016/j.irbm.2017.01.003 2017;35(8):1774-1783.
28. Peng WM, Cheng KJ, Liu YF, et al. Biomechanical and doi: 10.1002/jor.23445
mechanostat analysis of a titanium layered porous implant 32. Knoll WD, Gaida A, Maurer P. Analysis of mechanical stress
for mandibular reconstruction: the effect of the topology in reconstruction plates for bridging mandibular angle
optimization design. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. defects. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2006;34(4):201-209.
2021;124:112056. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2006.01.004
doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2021.112056
33. Afazov S, Denmark WA, Toralles BL, Holloway A, Yaghi A.
29. Liu Y, Wang H, Li S, et al. Compressive and fatigue behavior Distortion prediction and compensation in selective laser
of beta-type titanium porous structures fabricated by melting. Addit Manuf. 2017;17:15-22.
electron beam melting. Acta Mater. 2017;126:58-66. doi: 10.1016/j.addma.2017.07.005
doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2016.12.052
34. Frost HM. A 2003 update of bone physiology and Wolff’s
30. Torres-Sanchez C, Al Mushref FRA, Norrito M, Yendall K, Law for clinicians. Angle Orthod. 2004;74(1):3-15.
Liu Y, Conway PP. The effect of pore size and porosity on doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(2004)074<0003:AUOBPA>2.0.CO;2
mechanical properties and biological response of porous
titanium scaffolds. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 35. Biewener AA. Safety factors in bone strength. Calcif Tissue
2017;77:219-228. Int. 1993;53(Suppl 1):S68-S74.
doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2017.03.249 doi: 10.1007/BF01673406

Volume 10 Issue 6 (2024) 581 doi: 10.36922/ijb.3943